Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation AENTW Peers
See (AENTW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AENTW | $0.15 | +9.97% | 7.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,306.67 | +2.46% | 556.1B | 61.72 | $21.17 | N/A |
| DIS | $121.46 | +1.71% | 218.5B | 24.81 | $4.90 | +0.82% |
| LYV | $147.20 | +0.69% | 34.1B | 49.93 | $2.95 | N/A |
| FWONA | $94.93 | +1.53% | 33.2B | 1582.17 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FWONK | $104.79 | +0.95% | 33.1B | 2095.70 | $0.05 | N/A |
| WBD | $11.15 | +2.58% | 27.6B | -2.53 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOX | $52.21 | +1.62% | 24.5B | 12.92 | $4.04 | +0.95% |
| FOXA | $56.68 | +1.23% | 24.4B | 14.03 | $4.04 | +0.95% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
AENTW vs NFLX Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 556.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while NFLX trades at $1,306.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 61.72. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs DIS Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 218.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while DIS trades at $121.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LYV Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LYV trades at $147.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs FWONA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while FWONA trades at $94.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1582.17. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs FWONK Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while FWONK trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 2095.70. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs WBD Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while WBD trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs FOX Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while FOX trades at $52.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs FOXA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while FOXA trades at $56.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs VIAC Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs NWS Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while NWS trades at $33.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs NWSA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while NWSA trades at $29.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs TKO Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while TKO trades at $176.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 88.97. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs WMG Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while WMG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs ROKU Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while ROKU trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -118.49. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs EDR Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs PARA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while PARA trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs PARAA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while PARAA trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs PARAP Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs WWE Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs SIRI Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while SIRI trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LLYVK Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LLYVK trades at $79.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 293.41. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LLYVA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LLYVA trades at $77.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 287.96. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs NXST Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while NXST trades at $173.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs MSGS Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while MSGS trades at $206.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 983.81. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CNK Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CNK trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs MANU Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while MANU trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -35.03. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs BATRK Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while BATRK trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -141.09. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs BATRA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while BATRA trades at $49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -149.58. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs APE Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LGF-B Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LGF-A Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs MSGE Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while MSGE trades at $40.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs BOWL Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs IQ Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while IQ trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LION Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LION trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs SPHR Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while SPHR trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs IMAX Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while IMAX trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 59.86. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs AMC Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while AMC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs PLAY Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while PLAY trades at $30.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs SBGI Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 954.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while SBGI trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs HUYA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 832.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while HUYA trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -53.21. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs MCS Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while MCS trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs RSVR Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 489.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while RSVR trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 62.42. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs AMCX Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while AMCX trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LIVX Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs AENT Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 198.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while AENT trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs GAIA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while GAIA trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -23.19. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs AGAE Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while AGAE trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs GNUS Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs BREA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while BREA trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BREA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LVO Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 76.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LVO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LVO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CNVS Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CNVS trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs NIPG Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while NIPG trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CIDM Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs RSVRW Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while RSVRW trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs RDIB Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while RDIB trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs RDI Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while RDI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs TOON Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while TOON trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs ANGH Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while ANGH trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs ANGHW Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs ADD Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while ADD trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs MMV Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs DLPN Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while DLPN trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CSCW Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs KUKE Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while KUKE trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CPOP Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CPOP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs HOFV Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while HOFV trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CSSEP Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CSSEN Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CSSE Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs BLMZ Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while BLMZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs BZFDW Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while BZFDW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs CSSEL Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs HOFVW Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs RDBXW Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs MSGN Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs ESGC Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs HMTV Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs DISCK Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs DISCB Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs RDBX Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs EMWP Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs AESE Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs VIACP Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs VIACA Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AENTW is more volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AENTW.
AENTW vs LVOPP Comparison
AENTW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AENTW stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AENTW is priced at $0.15, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AENTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AENTW's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AENTW has daily volatility of 20.18 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.