AdEPT Technology Group plc
AdEPT Technology Group plc ADT.L Peers
See (ADT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADT.L | £200.50 | N/A | 50.2M | -11.79 | -£0.17 | N/A |
| 0R15.L | £7,456.00 | -2.94% | 10.7T | N/A | N/A | +0.59% |
| 0R2L.L | £245.98 | +0.51% | 279.3B | 109.81 | £2.24 | +1.34% |
| 0LQQ.L | £9.95 | -2.74% | 24.7B | 13.27 | £0.75 | +8.19% |
| VOD.L | £73.48 | -0.03% | 18.2B | -5.65 | -£0.13 | +4.33% |
| BT-A.L | £178.00 | -0.73% | 17.4B | 16.18 | £0.11 | +4.54% |
| SKMD.IL | £19.91 | -1.04% | 12.8B | 10.42 | £1.91 | N/A |
| 0XHR.L | £15.91 | +1.31% | 12B | 0.68 | £23.52 | N/A |
| SKMD.L | £22.10 | -1.60% | 8.7B | 11.57 | £1.91 | N/A |
| 0QAL.IL | £2.35 | -0.01% | 7B | 26.14 | £0.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ADT.L vs 0R15.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0R15.L has a market cap of 10.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0R15.L trades at £7,456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0R15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0R15.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L and 0R15.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ADT.L vs 0R2L.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0R2L.L has a market cap of 279.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0R2L.L trades at £245.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0R2L.L's P/E ratio is 109.81. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0R2L.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to 0R2L.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs 0LQQ.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0LQQ.L has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0LQQ.L trades at £9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0LQQ.L's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0LQQ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to 0LQQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs VOD.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, VOD.L has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while VOD.L trades at £73.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas VOD.L's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VOD.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to VOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs BT-A.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, BT-A.L has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while BT-A.L trades at £178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas BT-A.L's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BT-A.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to BT-A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs SKMD.IL Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SKMD.IL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while SKMD.IL trades at £19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas SKMD.IL's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SKMD.IL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L and SKMD.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ADT.L vs 0XHR.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0XHR.L has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0XHR.L trades at £15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0XHR.L's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0XHR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ADT.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and 0XHR.L has daily volatility of N/A.
ADT.L vs SKMD.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SKMD.L has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while SKMD.L trades at £22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas SKMD.L's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SKMD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to SKMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs 0QAL.IL Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0QAL.IL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0QAL.IL trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0QAL.IL's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0QAL.IL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L and 0QAL.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ADT.L vs AAF.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, AAF.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while AAF.L trades at £177.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas AAF.L's P/E ratio is 44.48. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AAF.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to AAF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs ZEG.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ZEG.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while ZEG.L trades at £692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas ZEG.L's P/E ratio is 76.89. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZEG.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to ZEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs 0HVP.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0HVP.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0HVP.L trades at £4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0HVP.L's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0HVP.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to 0HVP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs 0JDO.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0JDO.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0JDO.L trades at £27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0JDO.L's P/E ratio is -2763.00. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0JDO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to 0JDO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs RKMD.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, RKMD.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while RKMD.L trades at £4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas RKMD.L's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RKMD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L and RKMD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ADT.L vs 0IYQ.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0IYQ.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0IYQ.L trades at £10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0IYQ.L's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0IYQ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to 0IYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs HTWS.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, HTWS.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while HTWS.L trades at £125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas HTWS.L's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HTWS.L's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to HTWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs GAMA.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, GAMA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while GAMA.L trades at £1,184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas GAMA.L's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GAMA.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to GAMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs 0MDS.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0MDS.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0MDS.L trades at £5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0MDS.L's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0MDS.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to 0MDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs OIH.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, OIH.L has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while OIH.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas OIH.L's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OIH.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L and OIH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ADT.L vs 0FQ8.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, 0FQ8.L has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while 0FQ8.L trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas 0FQ8.L's P/E ratio is -17.87. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to 0FQ8.L's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to 0FQ8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs MAI.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, MAI.L has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while MAI.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas MAI.L's P/E ratio is 71.67. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MAI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L and MAI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ADT.L vs BBB.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, BBB.L has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while BBB.L trades at £22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas BBB.L's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BBB.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to BBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs ORNT.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, ORNT.L has a market cap of 800K. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while ORNT.L trades at £8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas ORNT.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ORNT.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to ORNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.
ADT.L vs TOOP.L Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, TOOP.L has a market cap of 431K. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while TOOP.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas TOOP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TOOP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L and TOOP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ADT.L vs SSA.IL Comparison
ADT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT.L stands at 50.2M. In comparison, SSA.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ADT.L is priced at £200.50, while SSA.IL trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.79, whereas SSA.IL's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ADT.L's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SSA.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT.L is less volatile compared to SSA.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.L.