Adamant Holdings Inc.
Adamant Holdings Inc. (ADMT.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ADMT.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADMT.CN | CA$0.02 | +0.00% | 2.7M | -2.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| VZ.NE | CA$21.12 | -0.71% | 276.6B | 10.18 | CA$2.06 | +5.55% |
| BCE.TO | CA$34.25 | -2.42% | 32.9B | 5.19 | CA$6.79 | +4.97% |
| RCI-A.TO | CA$52.00 | -1.74% | 29.2B | 4.25 | CA$12.74 | +3.70% |
| RCI-B.TO | CA$50.09 | -6.37% | 28.6B | 4.16 | CA$12.74 | +3.77% |
| T.TO | CA$17.71 | -0.95% | 28.2B | 25.06 | CA$0.72 | +9.28% |
| SJR-B.TO | CA$40.48 | +0.02% | 20.2B | 27.54 | CA$1.47 | +2.93% |
| BCE-PA.TO | CA$20.91 | +0.58% | 19.3B | 6.42 | CA$3.24 | +4.97% |
| BCE-PY.TO | CA$35.27 | +75.93% | 18.7B | 6.20 | CA$3.24 | +4.97% |
| QBR-A.TO | CA$58.50 | -1.88% | 13.4B | 16.48 | CA$3.55 | +2.48% |
Stock Comparison
ADMT.CN vs VZ.NE Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, VZ.NE has a market cap of 276.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while VZ.NE trades at CA$21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VZ.NE's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to VZ.NE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to VZ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check VZ.NE's competition here
ADMT.CN vs BCE.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, BCE.TO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while BCE.TO trades at CA$34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BCE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to BCE.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to BCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check BCE.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs RCI-A.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, RCI-A.TO has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while RCI-A.TO trades at CA$52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RCI-A.TO's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to RCI-A.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to RCI-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check RCI-A.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs RCI-B.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, RCI-B.TO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while RCI-B.TO trades at CA$50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RCI-B.TO's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to RCI-B.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to RCI-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check RCI-B.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs T.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, T.TO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while T.TO trades at CA$17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas T.TO's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to T.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to T.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check T.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs SJR-B.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, SJR-B.TO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while SJR-B.TO trades at CA$40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SJR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to SJR-B.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to SJR-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check SJR-B.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs BCE-PA.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, BCE-PA.TO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while BCE-PA.TO trades at CA$20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BCE-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to BCE-PA.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to BCE-PA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check BCE-PA.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs BCE-PY.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, BCE-PY.TO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while BCE-PY.TO trades at CA$35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BCE-PY.TO's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to BCE-PY.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to BCE-PY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check BCE-PY.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs QBR-A.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, QBR-A.TO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while QBR-A.TO trades at CA$58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas QBR-A.TO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to QBR-A.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN and QBR-A.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBR-A.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs QBR-B.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, QBR-B.TO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while QBR-B.TO trades at CA$57.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas QBR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to QBR-B.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to QBR-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check QBR-B.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs CCA.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, CCA.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while CCA.TO trades at CA$69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CCA.TO's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to CCA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to CCA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check CCA.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs CGO.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, CGO.TO has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while CGO.TO trades at CA$68.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CGO.TO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to CGO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to CGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check CGO.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs TGO.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, TGO.TO has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while TGO.TO trades at CA$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to TGO.TO's ROE of -87.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to TGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check TGO.TO's competition here
ADMT.CN vs TO.CN Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, TO.CN has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while TO.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to TO.CN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN and TO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TO.CN's competition here
ADMT.CN vs RVR.CN Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, RVR.CN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while RVR.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RVR.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to RVR.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN and RVR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RVR.CN's competition here
ADMT.CN vs TRL.TO Comparison April 2026
ADMT.CN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADMT.CN stands at 2.7M. In comparison, TRL.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ADMT.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while TRL.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADMT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TRL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADMT.CN's ROE is -5.55%, compared to TRL.TO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADMT.CN is less volatile compared to TRL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADMT.CN.Check TRL.TO's competition here