Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AD-UN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD-UN.TO | CA$18.90 | -0.63% | 859.8M | 4.69 | CA$4.03 | +7.17% |
| BNC.TO | CA$29.56 | +0.17% | 8.9B | 13.91 | CA$2.13 | +8.62% |
| EIT-UN.TO | CA$15.32 | +0.20% | 2.8B | 6.67 | CA$2.30 | +8.08% |
| NUBF.TO | CA$21.30 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 14.68 | CA$1.45 | +4.19% |
| PFIA.TO | CA$10.10 | -0.20% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.03% |
| NREA.TO | CA$24.18 | -0.04% | 1.4B | 21.36 | CA$1.13 | +1.87% |
| FIE.TO | CA$8.92 | +0.45% | 845.6M | 14.20 | CA$0.63 | +5.55% |
| MKB.TO | CA$19.01 | +0.37% | 841.3M | N/A | N/A | +3.98% |
| HDIF.TO | CA$8.70 | +0.35% | 439.3M | 20.83 | CA$0.42 | +10.55% |
| XTR.TO | CA$11.44 | +0.35% | 355.2M | 19.24 | CA$0.59 | +4.33% |
Stock Comparison
AD-UN.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while BNC.TO trades at CA$29.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check BNC.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while EIT-UN.TO trades at CA$15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check EIT-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while NUBF.TO trades at CA$21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check NUBF.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PFIA.TO trades at CA$10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PFIA.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while NREA.TO trades at CA$24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check NREA.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 845.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while FIE.TO trades at CA$8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check FIE.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 841.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while MKB.TO trades at CA$19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check MKB.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 439.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HDIF.TO trades at CA$8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HDIF.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 355.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while XTR.TO trades at CA$11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check XTR.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while CIC.TO trades at CA$13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check CIC.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while VCIP.TO trades at CA$26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check VCIP.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs IFRF.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 183M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while IFRF.TO trades at CA$7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to IFRF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check IFRF.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while CCOR.TO trades at CA$17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CCOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check CCOR.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while ZMI.TO trades at CA$17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check ZMI.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PBY-UN.TO trades at CA$15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PBY-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HUBL.TO trades at CA$13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HUBL.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while MGB.TO trades at CA$15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check MGB.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PIC-A.TO trades at CA$6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is less volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PIC-A.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while BMAX.TO trades at CA$14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check BMAX.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PLDI.TO trades at CA$18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PLDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PLDI.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while FAP.TO trades at CA$2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is less volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check FAP.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HTAE.TO trades at CA$16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HTAE.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while BGI-UN.TO trades at CA$5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check BGI-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while TLF.TO trades at CA$26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check TLF.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while XINC.TO trades at CA$20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check XINC.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while FFI-UN.TO trades at CA$12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check FFI-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while MID-UN.TO trades at CA$7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check MID-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HGR.TO trades at CA$5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HGR.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while RBN-UN.TO trades at CA$8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check RBN-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while XSC.TO trades at CA$17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check XSC.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HHLE.TO trades at CA$8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HHLE.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs XSI.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while XSI.TO trades at CA$16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to XSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check XSI.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while EARN.TO trades at CA$49.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to EARN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check EARN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while SKG-UN.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check SKG-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while FCGI.TO trades at CA$14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FCGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check FCGI.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while INC-UN.TO trades at CA$8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is less volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check INC-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while RIFI.TO trades at CA$17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to RIFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check RIFI.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PIN.TO trades at CA$18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PIN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PHR.TO trades at CA$19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PHR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PHR.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while ZWQT.TO trades at CA$17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check ZWQT.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs ETP.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while ETP.TO trades at CA$17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ETP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check ETP.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while FGX.NE trades at CA$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FGX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check FGX.NE's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while BSO-UN.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check BSO-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while FCMI.TO trades at CA$13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FCMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check FCMI.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CIQ-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check CIQ-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs TPAY.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while TPAY.TO trades at CA$21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check TPAY.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs CES.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while CES.TO trades at CA$24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check CES.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs ENI-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while ENI-UN.TO trades at CA$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ENI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check ENI-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HID.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HID.TO trades at CA$21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HID.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HBFE.TO trades at CA$10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HBFE.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while REIT.TO trades at CA$21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to REIT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check REIT.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs BLB-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, BLB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while BLB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BLB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is less volatile compared to BLB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check BLB-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs GDG-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, GDG-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while GDG-UN.TO trades at CA$13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GDG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GDG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to GDG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check GDG-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs BUA-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, BUA-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while BUA-UN.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BUA-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BUA-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BUA-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check BUA-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PMB-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PMB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PMB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PMB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PMB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PMB-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs PGI-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, PGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while PGI-UN.TO trades at CA$7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to PGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check PGI-UN.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs IGLB.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, IGLB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while IGLB.TO trades at CA$10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas IGLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IGLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to IGLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check IGLB.TO's competition here
AD-UN.TO vs HBL-UN.TO Comparison July 2025
AD-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AD-UN.TO stands at 859.8M. In comparison, HBL-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AD-UN.TO is priced at CA$18.90, while HBL-UN.TO trades at CA$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AD-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HBL-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AD-UN.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBL-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AD-UN.TO is more volatile compared to HBL-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AD-UN.TO.Check HBL-UN.TO's competition here