The a2 Milk Company Limited
The a2 Milk Company Limited ACOPY Peers
See (ACOPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACOPY | $5.39 | +17.09% | 3.91B | 38.47 | $0.14 | +0.88% |
| WLMIF | $2.39 | -0.42% | 14.92B | 12.58 | $0.19 | +5.12% |
| WLMIY | $23.59 | -0.26% | 14.73B | 12.61 | $1.87 | +4.77% |
| MHGVY | $18.61 | +1.14% | 9.62B | 25.85 | $0.72 | +3.41% |
| MNHVF | $17.61 | -2.76% | 9.11B | 24.80 | $0.71 | +3.00% |
| SALRF | $54.04 | +17.48% | 7.22B | 25.13 | $2.15 | +6.04% |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | N/A | 6.87B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +1.10% |
| PPOKF | $0.39 | +15.59% | 6.44B | 39.30 | $0.01 | +0.47% |
| SALRY | $11.91 | +0.32% | 6.37B | 22.06 | $0.54 | +6.68% |
| KLKBY | $5.32 | +24.15% | 6.36B | 35.47 | $0.15 | +0.58% |
Stock Comparison
ACOPY vs WLMIF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 14.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while WLMIF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to WLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs WLMIY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while WLMIY trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs MHGVY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while MHGVY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs MNHVF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while MNHVF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to MNHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SALRF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SALRF trades at $54.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs KLKBF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to KLKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs PPOKF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to PPOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SALRY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SALRY trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs KLKBY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while KLKBY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to KLKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CHPFF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 5.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to CHPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs AAYYY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CPOUF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CPOUF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to CPOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs BKFKF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while BKFKF trades at $47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to BKFKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs IDBHF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs GARPF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while GARPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to GARPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs UPBMF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while UPBMF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs KNKZF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to KNKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs ASTVF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to ASTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SLCJY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SLCJY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs DNDPF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to DNDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs PTABF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while PTABF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs GRCLF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while GRCLF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to GRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CTTQF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to CTTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs EDESY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 931.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while EDESY trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to EDESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs GRGSF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 774.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while GRGSF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to GRGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs MRVSY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 730.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while MRVSY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -16.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to MRVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs PPLFF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs ASAGF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 602.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while ASAGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs MHPSY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 599.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while MHPSY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to MHPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SISAF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 561.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to SISAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs AAGRY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 538.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while AAGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to AAGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs PPLFY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 492.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while PPLFY trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs BRCPF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to BRCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SLMCF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to SLMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs ORENF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 425.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while ORENF trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to ORENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SLCJF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs AEPLF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 373.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while AEPLF trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to AEPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs ALFDF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 284.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while ALFDF trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs UVPOF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 244.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while UVPOF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SARDF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SARDF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY and SARDF have similar daily volatility (15.74).
ACOPY vs SARDY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 175.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SARDY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to SARDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs STNT Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 162.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while STNT trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to STNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs DDEJF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 130.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while DDEJF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs DNDEF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs HLKKF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 48.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while HLKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to HLKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs NNUTU Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to NNUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs AASZF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 29.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while AASZF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to AASZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs GARPY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 23.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while GARPY trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CTUNF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 16.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CTUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CLAD Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs OPTHF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 13.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while OPTHF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs PRCF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 12.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CMGHY Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SPZI Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 8.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SPZI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs PEASF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEASF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to PEASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs HERB Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while HERB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CMGHF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 4.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CMGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to CMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs GCEH Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs GSFD Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 1.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while GSFD trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to GSFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs RSSFF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to RSSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs MINE Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs STEV Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs PNDHF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 813126.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to PNDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs IGPFF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 462979.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while IGPFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs FLAF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 460417.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to FLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs GLGLF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 430015.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while GLGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to GLGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs HERF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 249990.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while HERF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to HERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs MSAH Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 241135.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while MSAH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to MSAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs TAER Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 232968.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while TAER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to TAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs MSRM Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 216180.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while MSRM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SHMP Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 123627.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs OGAA Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46364.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to OGAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs URYL Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 30209.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to URYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CHYI Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 25422.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CHYI trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to CHYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SUWN Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 19963.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SUWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to SUWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs SIAF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18107.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to SIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs FFRMF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 1708.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs BIQIF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 1003.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs CFPI Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 384.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while CFPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs URBF Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to URBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.
ACOPY vs KALRQ Comparison
ACOPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACOPY stands at 3.91B. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACOPY is priced at $5.39, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACOPY currently has a P/E ratio of 38.47, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACOPY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACOPY is more volatile compared to KALRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACOPY.