Arçelik Anonim Sirketi
Arçelik Anonim Sirketi ACKAY Peers
See (ACKAY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACKAY | $14.80 | -14.45% | 1.8B | -29.60 | -$0.50 | N/A |
| HRSHF | $3.05 | -7.21% | 31.9B | 10.52 | $0.29 | +3.69% |
| HSHCY | $11.81 | +1.46% | 30.5B | 10.18 | $1.16 | +3.76% |
| QIHCF | $1.95 | N/A | 27.4B | 6.72 | $0.29 | +5.90% |
| HWDJY | $52.56 | N/A | 7.2B | 22.56 | $2.33 | +2.14% |
| HWDJF | $11.90 | N/A | 6.5B | 19.51 | $0.61 | +2.32% |
| BVILY | $43.79 | +6.94% | 6.3B | 42.93 | $1.02 | +1.04% |
| SEBYF | $94.65 | N/A | 5.2B | 19.64 | $4.82 | +3.08% |
| HISEF | $3.10 | N/A | 4.8B | 8.61 | $0.36 | +4.83% |
| RINIY | $12.00 | N/A | 3.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ACKAY vs HRSHF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HRSHF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while HRSHF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas HRSHF's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HRSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to HRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs HSHCY Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while HSHCY trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs QIHCF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to QIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs HWDJY Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs HWDJF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while HWDJF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to HWDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs BVILY Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while BVILY trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs SEBYF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while SEBYF trades at $94.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to SEBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs HISEF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while HISEF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs RINIY Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while RINIY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs RINIF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RINIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while RINIF trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas RINIF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RINIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to RINIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs BVILF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while BVILF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to BVILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs MAWHY Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while MAWHY trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to MAWHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs MAWHF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while MAWHF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs ELRXF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while ELRXF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is -125.60. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs ELUXY Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while ELUXY trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is -122.70. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to ELUXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs RHUHF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while RHUHF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to RHUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs JGLCF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 770.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while JGLCF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs CFSKF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 647.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while CFSKF trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs RYLHF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to RYLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs SEBYY Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while SEBYY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs VLBOF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 506.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to VLBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs WTWGF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WTWGF has a market cap of 161.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while WTWGF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas WTWGF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WTWGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to WTWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs WKGBF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WKGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to WKGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs VCCTF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while VCCTF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs IPGGF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IPGGF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while IPGGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas IPGGF's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPGGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to IPGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs DIIBF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while DIIBF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs RGBD Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while RGBD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs DGIX Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while DGIX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs LUVU Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while LUVU trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to LUVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs KMFI Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KMFI has a market cap of 197.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while KMFI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas KMFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to KMFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs ROWC Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ROWC has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while ROWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas ROWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROWC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to ROWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs DIAAF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIAAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to DIAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs DEER Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while DEER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to DEER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs THBD Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while THBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to THBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs PWNX Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while PWNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PWNX's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs VUOC Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while VUOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to VUOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs PFWIQ Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to PFWIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs FTDL Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while FTDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to FTDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs AUVIQ Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to AUVIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.
ACKAY vs ICPBF Comparison
ACKAY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACKAY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ICPBF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACKAY is priced at $14.80, while ICPBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACKAY currently has a P/E ratio of -29.60, whereas ICPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACKAY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACKAY is more volatile compared to ICPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACKAY.