PT Ace Hardware Indonesia Tbk
PT Ace Hardware Indonesia Tbk ACEHF Peers
See (ACEHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACEHF | $0.04 | N/A | 684.8M | N/A | N/A | +5.11% |
| BABAF | $14.93 | -0.96% | 286B | 16.05 | $0.93 | +1.39% |
| MPNGF | $18.48 | +0.06% | 112.9B | 23.70 | $0.78 | N/A |
| MPNGY | $36.42 | -1.58% | 110.6B | 23.20 | $1.57 | N/A |
| ANCTF | $52.70 | -0.42% | 50B | 19.38 | $2.72 | +1.01% |
| JDCMF | $17.30 | -0.32% | 48.9B | 8.44 | $2.05 | +2.89% |
| YAHOY | $7.30 | +2.53% | 26.3B | 25.17 | $0.29 | N/A |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | N/A | 23.4B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | N/A |
| RKUNY | $5.55 | +0.38% | 12B | -8.81 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| RKUNF | $5.29 | N/A | 11.4B | -8.40 | -$0.63 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ACEHF vs BABAF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 286B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while BABAF trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MPNGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 112.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MPNGF trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MPNGY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MPNGY trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ANCTF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ANCTF trades at $52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs JDCMF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while JDCMF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs YAHOY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while YAHOY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs XXLLY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs RKUNY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while RKUNY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs RKUNF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while RKUNF trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs NCLTF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while NCLTF trades at $97.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs NCLTY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while NCLTY trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SNROF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SNROF trades at $45.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 38.79. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SRTTY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SRTTY trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MONOY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MONOY trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 49.87. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SATLF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SATLF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs HKTGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ZLDSF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ZLDSF trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ZLNDY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ZLNDY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs DFRYF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while DFRYF trades at $55.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 67.33. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs DELHY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while DELHY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs DUFRY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while DUFRY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs DLVHF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while DLVHF trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs PETRY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MTTRY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MTTRY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs CDNAF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while CDNAF trades at $129.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs JBHIF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while JBHIF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MONOF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MONOF trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ELPQF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ELPQF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs CDNTF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while CDNTF trades at $183.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ALEGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ALEGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs JDDSF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while JDDSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs JDSPY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while JDSPY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SAXJY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SAXJY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs JTKWY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while JTKWY trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs JUMSY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while JUMSY trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs TKAYF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while TKAYF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SDIPF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SDIPF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ZLPSF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs JUMSF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ZOPLY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs DROOF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while DROOF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 58.13. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs DNLMY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while DNLMY trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs HNORY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while HNORY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MCARY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MCARY trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MRCIF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MRCIF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs FHNGY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while FHNGY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs YMDAF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while YMDAF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs DSITF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while DSITF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs PAHGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while PAHGF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MIZUF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MIZUF trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs BTOOY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs WHTPF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while WHTPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 200.67. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs GPGNF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while GPGNF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MGLUY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MGLUY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs LEFUF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while LEFUF trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MTAGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MTAGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MKRMF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs GRUPF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs FNXTF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 987.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SCCAF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs HWGC Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs THGHY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while THGHY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs THGPF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 535M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while THGPF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ASOMY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 512.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ASOMY trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs CRFCF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 486M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while CRFCF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs HLFDY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while HLFDY trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs HLFDF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs KGGNF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ASOMF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 420.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ASOMF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs BHOOY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 370.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while BHOOY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs KTYCF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 335.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while KTYCF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 104.93. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs BHHOF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SSILF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SSILF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs NBRNF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs HMAGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs YUMSF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while YUMSF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs HKTVY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while HKTVY trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -17.80. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs RDBBY Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs BNNNF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs GMELF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while GMELF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs AHAHF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs WCRS Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while WCRS trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs IGDFF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while IGDFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs BJURF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while BJURF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs MHCRF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs SPGZ Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ACEHF has daily volatility of 5.92 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.
ACEHF vs ADBGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ALLGF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ALLGF has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ALLGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLGF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALLGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to ALLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs PXHI Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while PXHI trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs IDGBF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs RDBBF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while RDBBF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs ARTZF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs GLHD Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs CNVAF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs TWRKF Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs FDIT Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs RLAB Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while RLAB trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs BWTL Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while BWTL trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.
ACEHF vs WINH Comparison
ACEHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACEHF stands at 684.8M. In comparison, WINH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ACEHF is priced at $0.04, while WINH trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACEHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACEHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WINH's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACEHF is less volatile compared to WINH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACEHF.