AB&T Financial Corp.
AB&T Financial Corp. ABTO Peers
See (ABTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABTO | $0.69 | -0.01% | 1.8M | -0.56 | -$1.23 | N/A |
| CAIXY | $2.86 | +2.49% | 180.9B | 8.87 | $0.32 | +5.81% |
| CIHKY | $35.19 | -1.32% | 169.8B | 8.99 | $3.91 | +3.86% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 156.7B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.26% |
| UNCFF | $66.09 | -0.48% | 104.4B | 9.65 | $6.95 | +3.95% |
| UNCRY | $33.13 | +0.82% | 102.8B | 9.51 | $3.47 | +2.61% |
| BNPQY | $45.14 | +2.17% | 101.9B | 8.18 | $5.51 | +5.86% |
| BNPQF | $89.63 | +1.28% | 101.2B | 8.28 | $10.83 | +6.01% |
| IITSF | $5.68 | -0.35% | 101B | 9.79 | $0.58 | +6.54% |
| DBSDY | $140.71 | +0.72% | 100.1B | 11.54 | $12.20 | +3.91% |
Stock Comparison
ABTO vs CAIXY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CAIXY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CIHKY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CIHKY trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CIHHF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs UNCFF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while UNCFF trades at $66.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs UNCRY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while UNCRY trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BNPQY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BNPQY trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BNPQF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BNPQF trades at $89.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and BNPQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs IITSF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while IITSF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs DBSDY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while DBSDY trades at $140.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs DBSDF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while DBSDF trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs SBKFF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs KBCSY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while KBCSY trades at $51.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BREJY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and BREJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs MZHOF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while MZHOF trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs AKSJF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs CHBJF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CHBJF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and CHBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs PBCRY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PBCRY trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs EBKDY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while EBKDY trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CHCJY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CHCJY trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs LLDTF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while LLDTF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and LLDTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs PBCRF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PBCRF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs PSBKF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs LLOBF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while LLOBF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CIXPF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CIXPF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs OVCHY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while OVCHY trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs OVCHF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while OVCHF trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CRARY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CRARY trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CRARF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CRARF trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs NRDBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while NRDBY trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BHKLY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BHKLY trades at $95.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BNKHF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BNKHF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs NBNKF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while NBNKF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs UOVEY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while UOVEY trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs STNDF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs UOVEF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while UOVEF trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and UOVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs SCGLY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SCGLY trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs DNBBF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while DNBBF trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs DNBBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while DNBBY trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CWESF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs KBCSF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while KBCSF trades at $101.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and KBCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs SCGLF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SCGLF trades at $55.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BKRKF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BKRKF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and BKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs SVKEF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SVKEF trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and SVKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs CRZBF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CRZBF trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs JPSTF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while JPSTF trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CRZBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CRZBY trades at $31.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BKRKY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BKRKY trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs DNKEY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while DNKEY trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs JPPTY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs EBKOF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while EBKOF trades at $85.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and EBKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs CEBCF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CEBCF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs SWDBF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SWDBF trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs SWDBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SWDBY trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs MLYNF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs JPPHY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while JPPHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs PPERY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PPERY trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CMAKY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CMAKY trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs HSNGY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while HSNGY trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs PPERF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PPERF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs HSNGF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while HSNGF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs DNSKF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs JPHLF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while JPHLF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BLMIF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BLMIF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and BLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs PSZKF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PSZKF trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and PSZKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs MLYBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while MLYBY trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs GBOOF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while GBOOF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs GBOOY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while GBOOY trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BKHPF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BKHPF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and BKHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs PSZKY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PSZKY trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs FCNCB Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while FCNCB trades at $1,671.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BKHYY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BKHYY trades at $91.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and BKHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs BDORY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BDORY trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CKHGY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CKHGY trades at $97.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and CKHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs CGMBF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs SBGOF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SBGOF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs SGBLY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SGBLY trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs RSNHF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while RSNHF trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs CIMDF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CIMDF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and CIMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs CMTDF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CMTDF trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and CMTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs CKHGF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs SUTNY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SUTNY trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs MDIBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while MDIBY trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs PBLOF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BDOUF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs AIBGY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while AIBGY trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs AIBRF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while AIBRF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and AIBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs ISNPY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while ISNPY trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs GPFOF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while GPFOF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and GPFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs MDIBF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while MDIBF trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs GPFOY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs SKCBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BPXXY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BPXXY trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BKRIY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BKRIY trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs BNCZF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs BKRIF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BKRIF trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs OTPBF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs TKGBY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while TKGBY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO and TKGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ABTO vs BKPKF Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while BKPKF trades at $49.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.
ABTO vs NBGRY Comparison
ABTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABTO stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NBGRY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABTO is priced at $0.69, while NBGRY trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas NBGRY's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, ABTO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBGRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABTO is less volatile compared to NBGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABTO.