Automatic Bank Services Limited
Automatic Bank Services Limited (ABANF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABANF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABANF | $5.90 | +0.00% | 236M | 17.35 | $0.34 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $17.06 | -1.04% | 53.5B | 46.05 | $0.37 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,681.00 | -1.90% | 52.9B | 45.60 | $36.84 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $80.00 | +4.38% | 46.7B | 16.38 | $4.68 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +1.86% |
| TOITF | $127.74 | +0.81% | 10.6B | 71.01 | $1.79 | N/A |
| NEXXY | $6.41 | +0.00% | 7.9B | 23.72 | $0.27 | +4.42% |
| TMICF | $58.29 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 36.66 | $1.59 | +2.02% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.81% |
| TMICY | $54.45 | +1.62% | 7.2B | 34.39 | $1.58 | +1.74% |
Stock Comparison
ABANF vs ADYEY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while ADYEY trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 46.05. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check ADYEY's competition here
ABANF vs ADYYF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while ADYYF trades at $1,681.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 45.60. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check ADYYF's competition here
ABANF vs BSQKZ Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while BSQKZ trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check BSQKZ's competition here
ABANF vs KAKZF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check KAKZF's competition here
ABANF vs TOITF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TOITF trades at $127.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 71.01. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TOITF's competition here
ABANF vs NEXXY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while NEXXY trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check NEXXY's competition here
ABANF vs TMICF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TMICF trades at $58.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TMICF's competition here
ABANF vs NEXPF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check NEXPF's competition here
ABANF vs TMICY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TMICY trades at $54.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TMICY's competition here
ABANF vs DRKTY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DRKTY's competition here
ABANF vs GMYTF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check GMYTF's competition here
ABANF vs SWDAF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SWDAF's competition here
ABANF vs STWRY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check STWRY's competition here
ABANF vs CIOXY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CIOXY's competition here
ABANF vs EXNWF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check EXNWF's competition here
ABANF vs DRKTF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DRKTF's competition here
ABANF vs OVHFF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while OVHFF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 136.67. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check OVHFF's competition here
ABANF vs SPNUF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SPNUF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 267.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SPNUF's competition here
ABANF vs MGPPF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while MGPPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 308.33. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check MGPPF's competition here
ABANF vs SANP Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SANP's competition here
ABANF vs WRDLY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while WRDLY trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check WRDLY's competition here
ABANF vs PHPYF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check PHPYF's competition here
ABANF vs WWLNF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 991.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while WWLNF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check WWLNF's competition here
ABANF vs YHEKF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 739.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while YHEKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 53.33. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check YHEKF's competition here
ABANF vs CPLFF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CPLFF's competition here
ABANF vs PYPTF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 654.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while PYPTF trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check PYPTF's competition here
ABANF vs FNCHF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FNCHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FNCHF's competition here
ABANF vs PRTHU Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check PRTHU's competition here
ABANF vs FMZNF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 582.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FMZNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FMZNF's competition here
ABANF vs DYNDF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 500.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DYNDF trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DYNDF's competition here
ABANF vs TDCSF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TDCSF's competition here
ABANF vs SPMYY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SPMYY trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 203.80. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SPMYY's competition here
ABANF vs FFPP Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 358.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FFPP trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FFPP's competition here
ABANF vs NFONF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check NFONF's competition here
ABANF vs CORZQ Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CORZQ's competition here
ABANF vs TYPMF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TYPMF's competition here
ABANF vs OTPMF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check OTPMF's competition here
ABANF vs SERKF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SERKF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SERKF's competition here
ABANF vs SEEMF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 200.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SEEMF's competition here
ABANF vs FSOYF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FSOYF's competition here
ABANF vs ERDLF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while ERDLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check ERDLF's competition here
ABANF vs GIVXF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check GIVXF's competition here
ABANF vs CGAAY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CGAAY's competition here
ABANF vs PYFRF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check PYFRF's competition here
ABANF vs FCLOF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FCLOF's competition here
ABANF vs HAIVF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while HAIVF trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -112.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check HAIVF's competition here
ABANF vs BGOPF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while BGOPF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -21.60. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check BGOPF's competition here
ABANF vs DGGXF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DGGXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DGGXF's competition here
ABANF vs HISNF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while HISNF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check HISNF's competition here
ABANF vs CROTF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CROTF's competition here
ABANF vs JGHG Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check JGHG's competition here
ABANF vs VRSSF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while VRSSF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check VRSSF's competition here
ABANF vs WHEN Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +16.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check WHEN's competition here
ABANF vs QBITF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check QBITF's competition here
ABANF vs NTTCF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check NTTCF's competition here
ABANF vs SCYRF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SCYRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SCYRF's competition here
ABANF vs CORZR Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CORZR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CORZR's competition here
ABANF vs APGT Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check APGT's competition here
ABANF vs NOWVF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while NOWVF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check NOWVF's competition here
ABANF vs SKKY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SKKY trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SKKY's competition here
ABANF vs ISDCF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check ISDCF's competition here
ABANF vs TFLM Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +23.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TFLM's competition here
ABANF vs CLOQ Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CLOQ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -17.60. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CLOQ's competition here
ABANF vs SDCH Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SDCH trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SDCH's competition here
ABANF vs POTTF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check POTTF's competition here
ABANF vs CLPMF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CLPMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CLPMF's competition here
ABANF vs PLCKF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while PLCKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +10.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check PLCKF's competition here
ABANF vs SFIIF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SFIIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SFIIF's competition here
ABANF vs CYBNY Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check CYBNY's competition here
ABANF vs FOBIF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FOBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FOBIF's competition here
ABANF vs QFEEF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check QFEEF's competition here
ABANF vs EPXGF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check EPXGF's competition here
ABANF vs DLTXF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DLTXF's competition here
ABANF vs DSAIF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DSAIF's competition here
ABANF vs TGCB Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TGCB trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TGCB's competition here
ABANF vs DRKOF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DRKOF's competition here
ABANF vs IPNFF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check IPNFF's competition here
ABANF vs KCRD Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while KCRD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check KCRD's competition here
ABANF vs PKKFF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while PKKFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check PKKFF's competition here
ABANF vs DVPNF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check DVPNF's competition here
ABANF vs NBVAF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while NBVAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check NBVAF's competition here
ABANF vs VENZF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while VENZF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check VENZF's competition here
ABANF vs OVTZ Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check OVTZ's competition here
ABANF vs MODGF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check MODGF's competition here
ABANF vs PKLBF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check PKLBF's competition here
ABANF vs VISM Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check VISM's competition here
ABANF vs MBLMF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check MBLMF's competition here
ABANF vs RIHT Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check RIHT's competition here
ABANF vs RKNEF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while RKNEF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check RKNEF's competition here
ABANF vs ATCHW Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while ATCHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check ATCHW's competition here
ABANF vs TONR Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check TONR's competition here
ABANF vs RCWDF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check RCWDF's competition here
ABANF vs INOTF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check INOTF's competition here
ABANF vs FUAPF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FUAPF's competition here
ABANF vs INAR Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check INAR's competition here
ABANF vs ITNF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 693.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while ITNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check ITNF's competition here
ABANF vs FSRDQ Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check FSRDQ's competition here
ABANF vs SMKG Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 670.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is less volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SMKG's competition here
ABANF vs SLXXF Comparison August 2025
ABANF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABANF stands at 236M. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 632.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ABANF is priced at $5.90, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABANF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.35, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ABANF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of +6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ABANF is more volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABANF.Check SLXXF's competition here