ALBA Se

ABA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ABA.F stands at 76.3M. In comparison, UWS.DE has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABA.F is priced at €7.75, while UWS.DE trades at €193.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ABA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 258.33, whereas UWS.DE's P/E ratio is 33.99. In terms of profitability, ABA.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWS.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABA.F is less volatile compared to UWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABA.F.

ABA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ABA.F stands at 76.3M. In comparison, VVD.DE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABA.F is priced at €7.75, while VVD.DE trades at €30.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ABA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 258.33, whereas VVD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, ABA.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVD.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABA.F is less volatile compared to VVD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABA.F.

ABA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ABA.F stands at 76.3M. In comparison, BFSA.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABA.F is priced at €7.75, while BFSA.DE trades at €28.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ABA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 258.33, whereas BFSA.DE's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, ABA.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFSA.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABA.F is less volatile compared to BFSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABA.F.

ABA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ABA.F stands at 76.3M. In comparison, ZEF.DE has a market cap of 756K. Regarding current trading prices, ABA.F is priced at €7.75, while ZEF.DE trades at €0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ABA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 258.33, whereas ZEF.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ABA.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEF.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABA.F is less volatile compared to ZEF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABA.F.

ABA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ABA.F stands at 76.3M. In comparison, 1EZ0.F has a market cap of 713. Regarding current trading prices, ABA.F is priced at €7.75, while 1EZ0.F trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ABA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 258.33, whereas 1EZ0.F's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ABA.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1EZ0.F's ROE of -7.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ABA.F is less volatile compared to 1EZ0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABA.F.