Ariana Resources plc
Ariana Resources plc AAU.L Peers
See (AAU.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAU.L | $1.10 | -4.35% | 21.38M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PLZL.IL | $19,650.50 | +4.07% | 25.68T | 3429.41 | $5.73 | N/A |
| 0R4M.L | $434.34 | +2.69% | 104.43B | 648.26 | $0.67 | +0.29% |
| 0QYZ.L | $228.04 | -0.11% | 43.92B | 45.44 | $5.02 | +0.60% |
| 0R28.L | $52.11 | N/A | 42.31B | 39.39 | $1.32 | +1.89% |
| WPM.L | $6,320.00 | -0.32% | 28.67B | 61.96 | $1.02 | +0.76% |
| EDV.L | $2,188.00 | +1.20% | 5.28B | -68.37 | -$0.32 | +2.56% |
| AUY.L | $475.00 | +1.06% | 4.57B | -5.72 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| GGP.L | $13.20 | +3.13% | 1.74B | -13.20 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CEY.L | $146.00 | N/A | 1.72B | 24.33 | $0.06 | +1.97% |
Stock Comparison
AAU.L vs PLZL.IL Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, PLZL.IL has a market cap of 25.68T. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while PLZL.IL trades at $19,650.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLZL.IL's P/E ratio is 3429.41. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLZL.IL's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to PLZL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs 0R4M.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, 0R4M.L has a market cap of 104.43B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while 0R4M.L trades at $434.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R4M.L's P/E ratio is 648.26. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0R4M.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to 0R4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs 0QYZ.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, 0QYZ.L has a market cap of 43.92B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while 0QYZ.L trades at $228.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QYZ.L's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0QYZ.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to 0QYZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs 0R28.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, 0R28.L has a market cap of 42.31B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while 0R28.L trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R28.L's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0R28.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to 0R28.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs WPM.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, WPM.L has a market cap of 28.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while WPM.L trades at $6,320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM.L's P/E ratio is 61.96. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to WPM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs EDV.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, EDV.L has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while EDV.L trades at $2,188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDV.L's P/E ratio is -68.37. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDV.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to EDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs AUY.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, AUY.L has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while AUY.L trades at $475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY.L's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUY.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to AUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs GGP.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, GGP.L has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while GGP.L trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGP.L's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGP.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to GGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs CEY.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, CEY.L has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while CEY.L trades at $146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEY.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to CEY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs HOC.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, HOC.L has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while HOC.L trades at $271.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOC.L's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOC.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to HOC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs PAF.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, PAF.L has a market cap of 932.47M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while PAF.L trades at $45.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAF.L's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAF.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to PAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs RSG.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, RSG.L has a market cap of 632.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while RSG.L trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSG.L's P/E ratio is -29.70. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RSG.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to RSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs AMRQ.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, AMRQ.L has a market cap of 363.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while AMRQ.L trades at $90.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRQ.L's P/E ratio is -30.17. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMRQ.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to AMRQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs CMCL.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, CMCL.L has a market cap of 244.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while CMCL.L trades at $1,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL.L's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMCL.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to CMCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs THX.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, THX.L has a market cap of 234.52M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while THX.L trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THX.L's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THX.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to THX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs MTL.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, MTL.L has a market cap of 205.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while MTL.L trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTL.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTL.L's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to MTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs SHG.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, SHG.L has a market cap of 155.20M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while SHG.L trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHG.L's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to SHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs AAZ.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, AAZ.L has a market cap of 151.37M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while AAZ.L trades at $132.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAZ.L's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAZ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to AAZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs SRB.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, SRB.L has a market cap of 135.37M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while SRB.L trades at $148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRB.L's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to SRB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs ALTN.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, ALTN.L has a market cap of 106.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while ALTN.L trades at $389.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTN.L's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALTN.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to ALTN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs CNR.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, CNR.L has a market cap of 65.86M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while CNR.L trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNR.L's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNR.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to CNR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs HUM.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, HUM.L has a market cap of 45.99M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while HUM.L trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUM.L's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUM.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to HUM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs KEFI.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, KEFI.L has a market cap of 45.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while KEFI.L trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEFI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to KEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs CORA.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, CORA.L has a market cap of 40.00M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while CORA.L trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORA.L's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORA.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to CORA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs PAT.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, PAT.L has a market cap of 33.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while PAT.L trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAT.L's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to PAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs OMI.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, OMI.L has a market cap of 29.44M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while OMI.L trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMI.L's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to OMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs 0UH8.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, 0UH8.L has a market cap of 15.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while 0UH8.L trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UH8.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0UH8.L's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to 0UH8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs LEX.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, LEX.L has a market cap of 14.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while LEX.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEX.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to LEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs 0VLY.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, 0VLY.L has a market cap of 12.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while 0VLY.L trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VLY.L's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0VLY.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to 0VLY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs GDP.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, GDP.L has a market cap of 10.67M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while GDP.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDP.L's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDP.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to GDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs SGZ.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, SGZ.L has a market cap of 10.26M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while SGZ.L trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGZ.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to SGZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs GRL.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, GRL.L has a market cap of 8.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while GRL.L trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRL.L's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRL.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to GRL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs ORR.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, ORR.L has a market cap of 8.18M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while ORR.L trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to ORR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs XTR.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, XTR.L has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while XTR.L trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to XTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs GCAT.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, GCAT.L has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while GCAT.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCAT.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCAT.L's ROE of +5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to GCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs CNG.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, CNG.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while CNG.L trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNG.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to CNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs ECR.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, ECR.L has a market cap of 4.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while ECR.L trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECR.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to ECR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs GAL.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, GAL.L has a market cap of 4.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while GAL.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAL.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAL.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to GAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs 0V2Y.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, 0V2Y.L has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while 0V2Y.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V2Y.L's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0V2Y.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to 0V2Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs WSBN.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, WSBN.L has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while WSBN.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSBN.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSBN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to WSBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs CGNR.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, CGNR.L has a market cap of 2.20M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while CGNR.L trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGNR.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to CGNR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs PALM.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, PALM.L has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while PALM.L trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PALM.L's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PALM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to PALM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs 0V9B.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, 0V9B.L has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while 0V9B.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V9B.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0V9B.L's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to 0V9B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs CGH.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, CGH.L has a market cap of 1.05M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while CGH.L trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGH.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is more volatile compared to CGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs KAT.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, KAT.L has a market cap of 947504.00. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while KAT.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KAT.L's ROE of +11.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to KAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.
AAU.L vs HAMA.L Comparison
AAU.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAU.L stands at 21.38M. In comparison, HAMA.L has a market cap of 385111.00. Regarding current trading prices, AAU.L is priced at $1.10, while HAMA.L trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAU.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAMA.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AAU.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAMA.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU.L is less volatile compared to HAMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.L.