Atlas Mara Limited
Atlas Mara Limited AAMAF Peers
See (AAMAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAMAF | $0.09 | +939900.00% | 133.2B | -0.85 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| UNCRY | $32.10 | +0.39% | 200B | 9.30 | $3.45 | +2.36% |
| CAIXY | $2.81 | -0.14% | 179.4B | 8.77 | $0.32 | +5.88% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.3B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.00 | -0.96% | 152.5B | 7.93 | $3.91 | +4.38% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 124.7B | 6.53 | $0.78 | +5.44% |
| BNPQF | $90.02 | -1.46% | 101.7B | 8.32 | $10.82 | +5.99% |
| BNPQY | $43.83 | +0.29% | 100.5B | 8.10 | $5.41 | +5.99% |
| UNCFF | $63.95 | -0.74% | 99.6B | 9.32 | $6.86 | +3.65% |
| IITSF | $5.57 | +1.36% | 99B | 9.77 | $0.57 | +6.67% |
Stock Comparison
AAMAF vs UNCRY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 200B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while UNCRY trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CAIXY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 179.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CAIXY trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKAYY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CIHKY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 152.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CIHKY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CIHHF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BNPQF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BNPQF trades at $90.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BNPQY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BNPQY trades at $43.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs UNCFF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while UNCFF trades at $63.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs IITSF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while IITSF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs DBSDY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while DBSDY trades at $138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs DBSDF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while DBSDF trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SBKFF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SBKFF trades at $87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs KBCSY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while KBCSY trades at $49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PBCRF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PBCRF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PBCRY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PBCRY trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs AKSJF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs MZHOF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while MZHOF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PSBKF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PSBKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs EBKDY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while EBKDY trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs LLOBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while LLOBF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs OVCHF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while OVCHF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CIXPF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CIXPF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs LLDTF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while LLDTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs OVCHY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while OVCHY trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CHCJY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CHCJY trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CRARY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CRARY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CRARF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CRARF trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CHBJF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CHBJF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs NBNKF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while NBNKF trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs NRDBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while NRDBY trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs UOVEF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs STNDF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs UOVEY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while UOVEY trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BHKLY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BHKLY trades at $84.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKRKF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKRKF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SCGLY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SCGLY trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs DNBBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while DNBBF trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKRKY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKRKY trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs KBCSF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while KBCSF trades at $101.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs DNBBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while DNBBY trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BNKHF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BNKHF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SCGLF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SCGLF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs JPPTY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while JPPTY trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CRZBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CRZBF trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CWESF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CRZBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CRZBY trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SVKEF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SVKEF trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs JPSTF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CEBCF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CEBCF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs DNKEY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while DNKEY trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs EBKOF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while EBKOF trades at $80.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SWDBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SWDBF trades at $27.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs JPPHY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while JPPHY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SWDBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SWDBY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PPERY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PPERY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs JPHLF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PPERF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PPERF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs DNSKF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while DNSKF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs MLYBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while MLYBY trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PSZKF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PSZKF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PSZKY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PSZKY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs HSNGY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while HSNGY trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs GBOOF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while GBOOF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SBGOF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SBGOF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs GBOOY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while GBOOY trades at $44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CMAKY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CMAKY trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs FCNCB Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while FCNCB trades at $1,645.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs HSNGF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BDORY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BDORY trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BLMIF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BLMIF trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKHYY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKHYY trades at $84.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CKHGY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CKHGY trades at $95.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BPXXY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SGBLY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SGBLY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs MLYNF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while MLYNF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CGMBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CGMBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs MDIBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while MDIBY trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SUTNY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SUTNY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CRDIY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs PBLOF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKHPF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKHPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs AIBGY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while AIBGY trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs ISNPY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while ISNPY trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs AIBRF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while AIBRF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CMTDF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CMTDF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs GPFOY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BDOUF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BDOUF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SKCBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SKCBY trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs RSNHF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while RSNHF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BNCZF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs OTPBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKRIY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKRIY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKRIF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKRIF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs SUGBY Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs GPFOF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while GPFOF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs BKPKF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while BKPKF trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs MDIBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs CIMDF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.
AAMAF vs FCBBF Comparison
AAMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAMAF stands at 133.2B. In comparison, FCBBF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAMAF is priced at $0.09, while FCBBF trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.85, whereas FCBBF's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, AAMAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCBBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAMAF is more volatile compared to FCBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAMAF.