AAG Energy Holdings Limited
AAG Energy Holdings Limited (AAGEF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AAGEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAGEF | $0.17 | +0.00% | 569.4M | 8.38 | $0.02 | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.35 | +0.00% | 183.6B | 8.96 | $0.82 | +3.47% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | +0.00% | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $16.35 | +0.00% | 31B | 10.62 | $1.54 | +6.55% |
| IPXHY | $24.00 | +0.17% | 27.6B | 10.96 | $2.16 | +2.46% |
| IPXHF | $20.69 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 8.96 | $2.31 | +3.06% |
| TRMLF | $46.09 | +0.00% | 17.8B | 17.92 | $2.57 | +4.58% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | +0.00% | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| SSLZY | $5.00 | +1.21% | 15.9B | 19.56 | $0.25 | +4.56% |
| STOSF | $4.69 | +0.00% | 15.2B | 18.76 | $0.25 | +5.05% |
Stock Comparison
AAGEF vs MEYYY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check MEYYY's competition here
AAGEF vs NSTKF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and NSTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTKF's competition here
AAGEF vs WOPEF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while WOPEF trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and WOPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WOPEF's competition here
AAGEF vs IPXHY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while IPXHY trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check IPXHY's competition here
AAGEF vs IPXHF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while IPXHF trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and IPXHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPXHF's competition here
AAGEF vs TRMLF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while TRMLF trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check TRMLF's competition here
AAGEF vs DETNF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to DETNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and DETNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETNF's competition here
AAGEF vs SSLZY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while SSLZY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check SSLZY's competition here
AAGEF vs STOSF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while STOSF trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and STOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STOSF's competition here
AAGEF vs PEXNY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PEXNY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and PEXNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEXNY's competition here
AAGEF vs NOVKY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and NOVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOVKY's competition here
AAGEF vs AETUF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while AETUF trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check AETUF's competition here
AAGEF vs SPGYF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check SPGYF's competition here
AAGEF vs PTRRY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PTRRY trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PTRRY's competition here
AAGEF vs DKDRF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while DKDRF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and DKDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DKDRF's competition here
AAGEF vs VSOGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while VSOGF trades at $59.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and VSOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSOGF's competition here
AAGEF vs DELKY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while DELKY trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and DELKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELKY's competition here
AAGEF vs MEGEF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while MEGEF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check MEGEF's competition here
AAGEF vs PREKF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PREKF trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PREKF's competition here
AAGEF vs DLKGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while DLKGF trades at $269.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and DLKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLKGF's competition here
AAGEF vs HBRIY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while HBRIY trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check HBRIY's competition here
AAGEF vs PMOIF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PMOIF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and PMOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMOIF's competition here
AAGEF vs PEYUF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PEYUF trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PEYUF's competition here
AAGEF vs JPTXF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while JPTXF trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and JPTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPTXF's competition here
AAGEF vs ATHOF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ATHOF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check ATHOF's competition here
AAGEF vs OASPW Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and OASPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OASPW's competition here
AAGEF vs PRMRF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PRMRF trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PRMRF's competition here
AAGEF vs NUVSF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while NUVSF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check NUVSF's competition here
AAGEF vs IPCFF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while IPCFF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 89.62. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check IPCFF's competition here
AAGEF vs PTGIF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PTGIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PTGIF's competition here
AAGEF vs EERGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while EERGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to EERGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and EERGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EERGF's competition here
AAGEF vs BTEGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and BTEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTEGF's competition here
AAGEF vs FRHLF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while FRHLF trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check FRHLF's competition here
AAGEF vs CDDRF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while CDDRF trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check CDDRF's competition here
AAGEF vs UNEGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while UNEGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to UNEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and UNEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNEGF's competition here
AAGEF vs BCHEY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while BCHEY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and BCHEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHEY's competition here
AAGEF vs BEPTF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while BEPTF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is -19.47. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and BEPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEPTF's competition here
AAGEF vs DTNOF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while DTNOF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -33.60. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and DTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTNOF's competition here
AAGEF vs PARXF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PARXF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PARXF's competition here
AAGEF vs DALXF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while DALXF trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 49.53. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check DALXF's competition here
AAGEF vs BIREF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while BIREF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check BIREF's competition here
AAGEF vs AAVVF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while AAVVF trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAVVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check AAVVF's competition here
AAGEF vs CRLFF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while CRLFF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check CRLFF's competition here
AAGEF vs KELTF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while KELTF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check KELTF's competition here
AAGEF vs BWEFF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while BWEFF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and BWEFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWEFF's competition here
AAGEF vs CRCQW Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check CRCQW's competition here
AAGEF vs WLLAW Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check WLLAW's competition here
AAGEF vs AOIFF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while AOIFF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to AOIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check AOIFF's competition here
AAGEF vs SQZZF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 982.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while SQZZF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to SQZZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check SQZZF's competition here
AAGEF vs ATUUF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 951.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ATUUF trades at $33.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUUF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check ATUUF's competition here
AAGEF vs KRNGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 905.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while KRNGF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and KRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNGF's competition here
AAGEF vs CWEGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check CWEGF's competition here
AAGEF vs KWTEF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 810.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while KWTEF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check KWTEF's competition here
AAGEF vs GUKYF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 636.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while GUKYF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 97.83. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to GUKYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and GUKYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUKYF's competition here
AAGEF vs RCKHF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 605.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while RCKHF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to RCKHF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check RCKHF's competition here
AAGEF vs ZPTAF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 568.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ZPTAF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check ZPTAF's competition here
AAGEF vs FECCF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while FECCF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to FECCF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check FECCF's competition here
AAGEF vs GFKSY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and GFKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFKSY's competition here
AAGEF vs SHASF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 481.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while SHASF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and SHASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHASF's competition here
AAGEF vs ZNOG Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 464.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ZNOG trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -40.68. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check ZNOG's competition here
AAGEF vs HZNFF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 455.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while HZNFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and HZNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZNFF's competition here
AAGEF vs OILSF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while OILSF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check OILSF's competition here
AAGEF vs COPJF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while COPJF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check COPJF's competition here
AAGEF vs TBNRF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and TBNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBNRF's competition here
AAGEF vs EXCE Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while EXCE trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and EXCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXCE's competition here
AAGEF vs BKBEF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check BKBEF's competition here
AAGEF vs PEGIY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and PEGIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEGIY's competition here
AAGEF vs ENQUF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 371.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ENQUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ENQUF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and ENQUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENQUF's competition here
AAGEF vs PRYGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and PRYGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRYGF's competition here
AAGEF vs KRNGY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while KRNGY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check KRNGY's competition here
AAGEF vs CEIEF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -31.13. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and CEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEIEF's competition here
AAGEF vs IPOOF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while IPOOF trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPOOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check IPOOF's competition here
AAGEF vs PESAF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PESAF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and PESAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PESAF's competition here
AAGEF vs PTALF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PTALF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PTALF's competition here
AAGEF vs CRNCY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, CRNCY has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while CRNCY trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CRNCY's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNCY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and CRNCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNCY's competition here
AAGEF vs GASXF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 247.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while GASXF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to GASXF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check GASXF's competition here
AAGEF vs GEGYF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while GEGYF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and GEGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEGYF's competition here
AAGEF vs FOLGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, FOLGF has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while FOLGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas FOLGF's P/E ratio is -19.82. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to FOLGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to FOLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check FOLGF's competition here
AAGEF vs ALVOF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ALVOF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check ALVOF's competition here
AAGEF vs EEGUF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while EEGUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -17.04. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and EEGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EEGUF's competition here
AAGEF vs RECAF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, RECAF has a market cap of 211.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while RECAF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas RECAF's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to RECAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to RECAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check RECAF's competition here
AAGEF vs TUWOY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while TUWOY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUWOY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check TUWOY's competition here
AAGEF vs PTOAF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PTOAF has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PTOAF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PTOAF's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTOAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PTOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PTOAF's competition here
AAGEF vs GEGYY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while GEGYY trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and GEGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEGYY's competition here
AAGEF vs ITEEF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check ITEEF's competition here
AAGEF vs JRNGF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, JRNGF has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while JRNGF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas JRNGF's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to JRNGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to JRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check JRNGF's competition here
AAGEF vs NFTN Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, NFTN has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while NFTN trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas NFTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to NFTN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and NFTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFTN's competition here
AAGEF vs TUWLF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 188.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while TUWLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUWLF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and TUWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUWLF's competition here
AAGEF vs PSHIF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PSHIF's competition here
AAGEF vs PIFYF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PIFYF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PIFYF's competition here
AAGEF vs CRNZF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while CRNZF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and CRNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNZF's competition here
AAGEF vs HRCXF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and HRCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRCXF's competition here
AAGEF vs RUBLF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while RUBLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check RUBLF's competition here
AAGEF vs LNDNF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while LNDNF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and LNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNDNF's competition here
AAGEF vs ECAOF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, ECAOF has a market cap of 171.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while ECAOF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ECAOF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to ECAOF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to ECAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check ECAOF's competition here
AAGEF vs RECWF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and RECWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RECWF's competition here
AAGEF vs DTNOY Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, DTNOY has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while DTNOY trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas DTNOY's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTNOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF and DTNOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTNOY's competition here
AAGEF vs PTRUF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PTRUF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PTRUF's competition here
AAGEF vs PNWRF Comparison February 2026
AAGEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAGEF stands at 569.4M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAGEF is priced at $0.17, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAGEF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, AAGEF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AAGEF is less volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAGEF.Check PNWRF's competition here