Aurora Solar Technologies Inc.
Aurora Solar Technologies Inc. AACTF Peers
See (AACTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AACTF | $0.01 | +31.58% | 2.01M | -1.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| GCPEF | $0.11 | N/A | 3.08B | -5.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| XISHY | $6.19 | -0.48% | 2.81B | 19.97 | $0.31 | +10.34% |
| XNYIF | $0.27 | -14.81% | 2.47B | 13.58 | $0.02 | +10.05% |
| SMTGF | $25.00 | +12.41% | 867.50M | -5.52 | -$4.53 | +2.17% |
| SMTGY | $2.45 | +0.41% | 850.15M | -5.44 | -$0.45 | +2.13% |
| GRMZF | $11.30 | N/A | 261.05M | 21.32 | $0.53 | +1.26% |
| HYSR | $0.02 | -3.31% | 114.18M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSSXF | $0.03 | N/A | 75.63M | -3.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SPRQF | $0.60 | N/A | 70.04M | -15.00 | -$0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AACTF vs GCPEF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while GCPEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to GCPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs XISHY Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while XISHY trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to XISHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs XNYIF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, XNYIF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while XNYIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XNYIF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to XNYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to XNYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SMTGF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SMTGF has a market cap of 867.50M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SMTGF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SMTGF's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SMTGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SMTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SMTGY Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 850.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SMTGY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SMTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs GRMZF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.05M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs HYSR Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 114.18M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while HYSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs CSSXF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, CSSXF has a market cap of 75.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while CSSXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CSSXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CSSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to CSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SPRQF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 70.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SPRQF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SPRQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs UGEIF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.16M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to UGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs CVUEF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 32.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while CVUEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs NEWH Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 26.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while NEWH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs FLDI Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.80M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while FLDI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs PXPC Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 12.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while PXPC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs CBUTF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SAENF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 5.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SAENF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SAENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SEHLF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SEHLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SEHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs NTCXF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs TSPG Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 2.52M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while TSPG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to TSPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs PTOS Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while PTOS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to PTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SIRC Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SIRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs QCLSF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 689041.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs ANTGF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578001.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to ANTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs PSWW Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, PSWW has a market cap of 317886.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while PSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PSWW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to PSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs UNSS Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60055.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while UNSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to UNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SPSO Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43283.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SPSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SPSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs ABCE Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26052.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while ABCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to ABCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs OPVS Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24025.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while OPVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to OPVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs CHJI Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19389.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while CHJI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to CHJI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SOEN Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18307.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SOEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SOEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs NTAC Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, NTAC has a market cap of 18114.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while NTAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NTAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NTAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to NTAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SRWRF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SRWRF has a market cap of 17875.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SRWRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SRWRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SRWRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to SRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SNRS Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16606.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SNRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs XDSL Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8498.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while XDSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to XDSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs MBCI Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7030.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while MBCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to MBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs SUNWQ Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 5678.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to SUNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs ISUNQ Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 4738.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to ISUNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs VSOLF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4607.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to VSOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs APVNF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3135.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while APVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs PPRW Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3075.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while PPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PPRW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to PPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs GRYG Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3041.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while GRYG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs GSLO Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 1309.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while GSLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to GSLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs EDYYF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs EBODF Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while EBODF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to EBODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs IXEH Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while IXEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is more volatile compared to IXEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.
AACTF vs KOVR Comparison
AACTF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACTF stands at 2.01M. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 44.00. Regarding current trading prices, AACTF is priced at $0.01, while KOVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACTF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AACTF is less volatile compared to KOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACTF.