AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. AACAY Peers
See (AACAY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AACAY | $4.83 | -0.90% | 5.7B | 22.98 | $0.21 | +0.09% |
| ERIXF | $8.62 | N/A | 28.7B | 172.40 | $0.05 | +3.16% |
| NOKBF | $5.38 | -0.09% | 28.1B | 21.50 | $0.25 | +3.01% |
| ZTCOF | $2.91 | +6.33% | 20.3B | 12.12 | $0.24 | +6.25% |
| AACAF | $4.53 | N/A | 5.4B | 21.57 | $0.21 | +0.09% |
| YZOFF | $1.03 | N/A | 2.6B | 4.90 | $0.21 | +1.05% |
| HMNKF | $36.65 | N/A | 1.8B | 55.53 | $0.66 | N/A |
| VTKLY | $7.06 | +5.85% | 1.8B | 11.39 | $0.62 | +8.72% |
| ETCMY | $0.78 | -6.02% | 1.5B | -1.32 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| VTKLF | $5.81 | N/A | 1.5B | 9.37 | $0.62 | +11.18% |
Stock Comparison
AACAY vs ERIXF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ERIXF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 172.40. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs NOKBF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while NOKBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ZTCOF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ZTCOF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs AACAF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while AACAF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs YZOFF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs HMNKF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while HMNKF trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to HMNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs VTKLY Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while VTKLY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ETCMY Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ETCMY trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs VTKLF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while VTKLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs FXCNF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while FXCNF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ADVOF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ADVOF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs EUTLF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while EUTLF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs HTCKF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to HTCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs FXCNY Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while FXCNY trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -44.27. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs OKIEY Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 925.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while OKIEY trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs UBLXF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 827.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while UBLXF trades at $109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs COBJF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 702.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while COBJF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs EVTZF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 667.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while EVTZF trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs OKIEF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs EVSBY Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 526M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while EVSBY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs SATOF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while SATOF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to SATOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs FLTCF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 413.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while FLTCF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs PAOTF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while PAOTF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -16.55. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs VNWTF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while VNWTF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to VNWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs QTRHF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while QTRHF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs SIMTF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while SIMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ATSKF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs NPNZF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to NPNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs BEWFF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while BEWFF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to BEWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ELSLF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to ELSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ASROF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ASROF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to ASROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs CYSNF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while CYSNF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -74.87. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to CYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs BYLTF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs WSTL Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while WSTL trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs MOYFF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while MOYFF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs AAPJ Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to AAPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ENAFF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs MILOF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to MILOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ATGN Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ATGN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs KPIFF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while KPIFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs CYCA Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while CYCA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs LTCCF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to LTCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs VMNT Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while VMNT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ISEYF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ISEYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs TTLTF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while TTLTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs STRH Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs WLAN Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs HPNN Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs NRRWF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while NRRWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs NVRVF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while NVRVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to NVRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs LMGR Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs CNTFY Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to CNTFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs MFCO Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while MFCO trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs BDRL Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 668.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while BDRL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs MLRT Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 595.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while MLRT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ATCLF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 493.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ELST Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 445.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ELST trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs CRMK Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 441.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs AXBSF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs BKSD Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to BKSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs WGNR Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 146.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs CAMPQ Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs VCTY Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 95.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ERFB Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to ERFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs PDXP Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs EZEN Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AACAY has daily volatility of 2.18 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.
AACAY vs PMOZ Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to PMOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs CRLI Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to CRLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs IPTK Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ETCIA Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ETCIA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to ETCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs LTTC Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs FBCE Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs OTOW Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to OTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs TPTW Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 7.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to TPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs UTRK Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs JUMT Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while JUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs AVSR Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to AVSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs MPEG Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to MPEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs WIRX Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while WIRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs CYBD Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while CYBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to CYBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs VRCM Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs IZNN Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs PRXM Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to PRXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs RPDT Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while RPDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPDT's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs XCOMQ Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs RITT Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ZSTN Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ABILF Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to ABILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs GNRD Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to GNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ZTNO Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs ORSX Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs TCCO Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 185. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to TCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs HDIH Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to HDIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs LMSC Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to LMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs STCI Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to STCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs BETW Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs AXCP Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AXCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while AXCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is more volatile compared to AXCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.
AACAY vs DGIV Comparison
AACAY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AACAY stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DGIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AACAY is priced at $4.83, while DGIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AACAY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.98, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AACAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AACAY is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AACAY.