Alcoa Corporation

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, CHHQY has a market cap of 123.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while CHHQY trades at $13.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CHHQY's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHHQY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to CHHQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, CHHQF has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while CHHQF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CHHQF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHHQF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to CHHQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, ALMMF has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while ALMMF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ALMMF's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to ALMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, ACHHY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while ACHHY trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ACHHY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACHHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to ACHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, NHYKF has a market cap of 11.09B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while NHYKF trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NHYKF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NHYKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to NHYKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, NHYDY has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while NHYDY trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NHYDY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NHYDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to NHYDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, AWCMY has a market cap of 10.71B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while AWCMY trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AWCMY's P/E ratio is -17.57. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AWCMY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to AWCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, AWCMF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while AWCMF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AWCMF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AWCMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to AWCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, CSTM has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while CSTM trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CSTM's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSTM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to CSTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, CENX has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while CENX trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CENX's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CENX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to CENX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, KALU has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while KALU trades at $67.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas KALU's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KALU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to KALU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, EORBF has a market cap of 91.71M. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while EORBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas EORBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EORBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to EORBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, BXRDF has a market cap of 10.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while BXRDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas BXRDF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BXRDF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to BXRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, AFML has a market cap of 7656.00. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while AFML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AFML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to AFML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, NORNQ has a market cap of 7019.00. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while NORNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NORNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NORNQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to NORNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, MNSF has a market cap of 1889.00. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while MNSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas MNSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to MNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, ORMTQ has a market cap of 1866.00. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while ORMTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ORMTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORMTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AA is less volatile compared to ORMTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, ACH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while ACH trades at $9.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ACH's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to ACH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, CHZHF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while CHZHF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CHZHF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHZHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to CHZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.

AA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AA stands at 6.71B. In comparison, UNRIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, AA is priced at $25.91, while UNRIF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas UNRIF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, AA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNRIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AA is more volatile compared to UNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AA.