Pop Mart International Group Limited
Pop Mart International Group Limited 9992.HK Peers
See (9992.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9992.HK | HK$250.60 | +2.12% | 332.8B | 97.13 | HK$2.58 | +0.36% |
| 2020.HK | HK$93.10 | +0.32% | 258.4B | 15.75 | HK$5.91 | +2.54% |
| 2331.HK | HK$17.00 | +2.29% | 43.8B | 13.39 | HK$1.27 | +5.07% |
| 0325.HK | HK$128.80 | +0.47% | 32.1B | -70.77 | -HK$1.82 | N/A |
| 8032.HK | HK$1.47 | +2.80% | 14.3B | 18.38 | HK$0.08 | N/A |
| 0308.HK | HK$1.85 | +0.54% | 10.2B | 92.50 | HK$0.02 | +0.82% |
| 1126.HK | HK$13.82 | -2.95% | 9.4B | 12.68 | HK$1.09 | +4.21% |
| 2255.HK | HK$0.82 | +1.23% | 6.7B | -8.20 | -HK$0.10 | N/A |
| 0678.HK | HK$0.42 | +5.06% | 3.5B | -0.40 | -HK$1.03 | N/A |
| 6858.HK | HK$3.51 | N/A | 2.1B | -175.50 | -HK$0.02 | +4.64% |
Stock Comparison
9992.HK vs 2020.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 2020.HK has a market cap of 258.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 2020.HK trades at HK$93.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 2020.HK's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 2020.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 2020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 2331.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 2331.HK has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 2331.HK trades at HK$17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 2331.HK's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 2331.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 2331.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0325.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0325.HK has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0325.HK trades at HK$128.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0325.HK's P/E ratio is -70.77. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0325.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0325.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8032.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 8032.HK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 8032.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 8032.HK's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8032.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 8032.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0308.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0308.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0308.HK trades at HK$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0308.HK's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0308.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0308.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1126.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 1126.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 1126.HK trades at HK$13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 1126.HK's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1126.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 1126.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 2255.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 2255.HK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 2255.HK trades at HK$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 2255.HK's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 2255.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 2255.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0678.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0678.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0678.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0678.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0678.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0678.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 6858.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 6858.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 6858.HK trades at HK$3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 6858.HK's P/E ratio is -175.50. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 6858.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 6858.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1086.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 1086.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 1086.HK trades at HK$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 1086.HK's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1086.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 1086.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0635.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0635.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0635.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0635.HK's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0635.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0635.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0805.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0805.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0805.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0805.HK's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0805.HK's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0805.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0869.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0869.HK has a market cap of 637.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0869.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0869.HK's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0869.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0869.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0419.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0419.HK has a market cap of 516.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0419.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0419.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0419.HK's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0419.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0413.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0413.HK has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0413.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0413.HK's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0413.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0413.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0381.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0381.HK has a market cap of 418.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0381.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0381.HK's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0381.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0381.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0114.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0114.HK has a market cap of 338.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0114.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0114.HK's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0114.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0114.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1005.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 1005.HK has a market cap of 332.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 1005.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 1005.HK's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1005.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 1005.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0180.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0180.HK has a market cap of 256.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0180.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0180.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0180.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0180.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0361.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0361.HK has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0361.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0361.HK's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0361.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0361.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0234.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0234.HK has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0234.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0234.HK's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0234.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0234.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1803.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 1803.HK has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 1803.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 1803.HK's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1803.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 1803.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8406.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 8406.HK has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 8406.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 8406.HK's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8406.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 8406.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1123.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 1123.HK has a market cap of 133.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 1123.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 1123.HK's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1123.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 1123.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0765.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0765.HK has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0765.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0765.HK's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0765.HK's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0765.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1348.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 1348.HK has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 1348.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 1348.HK's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1348.HK's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 1348.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 6918.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 6918.HK has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 6918.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 6918.HK's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 6918.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 6918.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 3830.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 3830.HK has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 3830.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 3830.HK's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 3830.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 3830.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8545.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 8545.HK has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 8545.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 8545.HK's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8545.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 8545.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0209.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 0209.HK has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 0209.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 0209.HK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0209.HK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0209.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8228.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 8228.HK has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 8228.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 8228.HK's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8228.HK's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 8228.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 3358.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 332.8B. In comparison, 3358.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at HK$250.60, while 3358.HK trades at HK$4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 97.13, whereas 3358.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 3358.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 3358.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.