Pop Mart International Group Limited
Pop Mart International Group Limited 9992.HK Peers
See (9992.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
9992.HK vs 2020.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 2020.HK has a market cap of 261.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 2020.HK trades at $94.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 2020.HK's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 2020.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 2020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 2331.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 2331.HK has a market cap of 39.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 2331.HK trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 2331.HK's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 2331.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 2331.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0325.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0325.HK has a market cap of 32.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0325.HK trades at $129.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0325.HK's P/E ratio is -73.22. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0325.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0325.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8032.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 8032.HK has a market cap of 14.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 8032.HK trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 8032.HK's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8032.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 8032.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 2255.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 2255.HK has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 2255.HK trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 2255.HK's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 2255.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 2255.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0308.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0308.HK has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0308.HK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0308.HK's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0308.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0308.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1126.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 1126.HK has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 1126.HK trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 1126.HK's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1126.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 1126.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0678.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0678.HK has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0678.HK trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0678.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0678.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0678.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1086.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 1086.HK has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 1086.HK trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 1086.HK's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1086.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 1086.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 6858.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 6858.HK has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 6858.HK trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 6858.HK's P/E ratio is 57.17. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 6858.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 6858.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0805.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0805.HK has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0805.HK trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0805.HK's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0805.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0805.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0635.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0635.HK has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0635.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0635.HK's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0635.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0635.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0869.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0869.HK has a market cap of 613.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0869.HK trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0869.HK's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0869.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0869.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0419.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0419.HK has a market cap of 570.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0419.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0419.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0419.HK's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0419.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0381.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0381.HK has a market cap of 481.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0381.HK trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0381.HK's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0381.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0381.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1005.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 1005.HK has a market cap of 468.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 1005.HK trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 1005.HK's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1005.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 1005.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0413.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0413.HK has a market cap of 389.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0413.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0413.HK's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0413.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 0413.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0114.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0114.HK has a market cap of 290.16M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0114.HK trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0114.HK's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0114.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0114.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0180.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0180.HK has a market cap of 256.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0180.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0180.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0180.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0180.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0361.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0361.HK has a market cap of 202.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0361.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0361.HK's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0361.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0361.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1803.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 1803.HK has a market cap of 140.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 1803.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 1803.HK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1803.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 1803.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0234.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0234.HK has a market cap of 138.73M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0234.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0234.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0234.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0234.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1123.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 1123.HK has a market cap of 136.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 1123.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 1123.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1123.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 1123.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0765.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0765.HK has a market cap of 116.06M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0765.HK trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0765.HK's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0765.HK's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0765.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8406.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 8406.HK has a market cap of 108.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 8406.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 8406.HK's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8406.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 8406.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 1348.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 1348.HK has a market cap of 95.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 1348.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 1348.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 1348.HK's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 1348.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 6918.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 6918.HK has a market cap of 75.57M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 6918.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 6918.HK's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 6918.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 6918.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 3830.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 3830.HK has a market cap of 47.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 3830.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 3830.HK's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 3830.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 3830.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8545.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 8545.HK has a market cap of 46.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 8545.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 8545.HK's P/E ratio is 97.50. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8545.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is less volatile compared to 8545.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 0209.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 0209.HK has a market cap of 22.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 0209.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 0209.HK's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0209.HK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 0209.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 8228.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 8228.HK has a market cap of 18.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 8228.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 8228.HK's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 8228.HK's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 8228.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
9992.HK vs 3358.HK Comparison
9992.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9992.HK stands at 253.81B. In comparison, 3358.HK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 9992.HK is priced at $191.10, while 3358.HK trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9992.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.14, whereas 3358.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 9992.HK's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 3358.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9992.HK is more volatile compared to 3358.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9992.HK.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020.HK | $94.05 | +0.48% | 261.04B | 16.30 | $5.77 | +2.30% |
| 9992.HK | $191.10 | +6.76% | 253.81B | 76.14 | $2.51 | +0.16% |
| 2331.HK | $15.38 | +0.65% | 39.61B | 12.40 | $1.24 | +3.78% |
| 0325.HK | $129.60 | +1.41% | 32.30B | -73.22 | -$1.77 | N/A |
| 8032.HK | $1.47 | +2.80% | 14.28B | 18.38 | $0.08 | N/A |
| 2255.HK | $0.72 | +5.88% | 5.84B | -7.20 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| 0308.HK | $1.02 | +0.99% | 5.65B | 51.00 | $0.02 | +2.45% |
| 1126.HK | $6.40 | +3.06% | 4.33B | 5.87 | $1.09 | +3.13% |
| 0678.HK | $0.42 | +5.06% | 3.52B | -0.40 | -$1.03 | N/A |
| 1086.HK | $1.35 | -6.25% | 2.25B | 6.43 | $0.21 | N/A |