Lilycolor Co., Ltd.
Lilycolor Co., Ltd. (9827.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9827.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9827.T | ¥647.00 | +0.78% | 7.8B | 14.99 | ¥42.44 | +4.51% |
| 5947.T | ¥3,735.00 | +2.24% | 505.2B | 15.41 | ¥237.44 | +2.46% |
| 6755.T | ¥2,798.00 | +0.00% | 293B | -75.19 | -¥37.21 | +0.68% |
| 4665.T | ¥4,235.00 | +1.15% | 197.9B | 20.73 | ¥203.03 | +2.42% |
| 8130.T | ¥3,105.00 | +1.14% | 181.6B | 14.44 | ¥213.98 | +4.51% |
| 7981.T | ¥2,826.00 | +2.39% | 173.3B | 12.98 | ¥211.14 | +3.28% |
| 7972.T | ¥3,245.00 | +3.84% | 149.5B | 15.90 | ¥190.31 | +1.98% |
| 7965.T | ¥1,708.00 | +13.87% | 105.8B | 18.06 | ¥92.25 | +4.32% |
| 5946.T | ¥2,003.00 | -0.35% | 67.9B | 31.23 | ¥63.92 | +2.07% |
| 7989.T | ¥2,548.00 | +0.83% | 50.6B | 15.61 | ¥161.12 | +2.26% |
Stock Comparison
9827.T vs 5947.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5947.T has a market cap of 505.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 5947.T trades at ¥3,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 5947.T's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5947.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 5947.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 5947.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6755.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6755.T has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6755.T trades at ¥2,798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6755.T's P/E ratio is -75.19. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6755.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 6755.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6755.T's competition here
9827.T vs 4665.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 4665.T has a market cap of 197.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 4665.T trades at ¥4,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 4665.T's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4665.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 4665.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 4665.T's competition here
9827.T vs 8130.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 8130.T has a market cap of 181.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 8130.T trades at ¥3,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 8130.T's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8130.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 8130.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 8130.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7981.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7981.T has a market cap of 173.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7981.T trades at ¥2,826.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7981.T's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7981.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7981.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7972.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7972.T has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7972.T trades at ¥3,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7972.T's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7972.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7972.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7972.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7965.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7965.T has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7965.T trades at ¥1,708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7965.T's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7965.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7965.T's competition here
9827.T vs 5946.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5946.T has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 5946.T trades at ¥2,003.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 5946.T's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5946.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 5946.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 5946.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7989.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7989.T has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7989.T trades at ¥2,548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7989.T's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7989.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 7989.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7989.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7840.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7840.T has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7840.T trades at ¥1,327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7840.T's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7840.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7840.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7840.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6932.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6932.T has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6932.T trades at ¥2,591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6932.T's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6932.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 6932.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6932.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7874.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7874.T has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7874.T trades at ¥1,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7874.T's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7874.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7874.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7874.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7955.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7955.T has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7955.T trades at ¥943.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7955.T's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7955.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 7955.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7955.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6924.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6924.T has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6924.T trades at ¥4,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6924.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6924.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 6924.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6924.T's competition here
9827.T vs 5909.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5909.T has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 5909.T trades at ¥960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 5909.T's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5909.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 5909.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 5909.T's competition here
9827.T vs 3421.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 3421.T has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 3421.T trades at ¥1,736.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 3421.T's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3421.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 3421.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 3421.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6445.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6445.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6445.T trades at ¥1,321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6445.T's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6445.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 6445.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6445.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6484.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6484.T has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6484.T trades at ¥2,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6484.T's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6484.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 6484.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6484.T's competition here
9827.T vs 5965.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5965.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 5965.T trades at ¥1,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 5965.T's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5965.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 5965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 5965.T's competition here
9827.T vs 5951.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5951.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 5951.T trades at ¥1,027.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 5951.T's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5951.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 5951.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 5951.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7885.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7885.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7885.T trades at ¥1,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7885.T's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7885.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7885.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7885.T's competition here
9827.T vs 5941.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5941.T has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 5941.T trades at ¥2,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 5941.T's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5941.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 5941.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 5941.T's competition here
9827.T vs 3140.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 3140.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 3140.T trades at ¥1,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 3140.T's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3140.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 3140.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 3140.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6291.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6291.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6291.T trades at ¥1,243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6291.T's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6291.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 6291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6291.T's competition here
9827.T vs 4235.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 4235.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 4235.T trades at ¥685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 4235.T's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4235.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 4235.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 4235.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7822.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7822.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7822.T trades at ¥230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7822.T's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7822.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7822.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7822.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7887.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7887.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7887.T trades at ¥2,022.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7887.T's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7887.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is less volatile compared to 7887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7887.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7898.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7898.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7898.T trades at ¥989.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7898.T's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7898.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 7898.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7898.T's competition here
9827.T vs 8119.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 8119.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 8119.T trades at ¥808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 8119.T's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8119.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 8119.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 8119.T's competition here
9827.T vs 5956.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5956.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 5956.T trades at ¥609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 5956.T's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5956.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 5956.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 5956.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6612.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6612.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6612.T trades at ¥618.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6612.T's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6612.T's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 6612.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6612.T's competition here
9827.T vs 6897.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 6897.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 6897.T trades at ¥402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6897.T's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6897.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 6897.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 6897.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7807.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7807.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7807.T trades at ¥836.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7807.T's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7807.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 7807.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7807.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7791.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7791.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7791.T trades at ¥811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7791.T's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7791.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 7791.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7791.T's competition here
9827.T vs 7997.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 7997.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 7997.T trades at ¥967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 7997.T's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7997.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 7997.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 7997.T's competition here
9827.T vs 3450.T Comparison April 2026
9827.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9827.T stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 3450.T has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9827.T is priced at ¥647.00, while 3450.T trades at ¥1,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9827.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 3450.T's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, 9827.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3450.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9827.T is more volatile compared to 3450.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9827.T.Check 3450.T's competition here