SECOM Co., Ltd.
SECOM Co., Ltd. 9735.T Peers
See (9735.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9735.T | ¥5,252.00 | -0.23% | 2.2T | 21.46 | ¥242.89 | +1.87% |
| 2331.T | ¥1,003.50 | -0.20% | 486.8B | 18.11 | ¥55.43 | +1.33% |
| 6744.T | ¥3,775.00 | +2.58% | 210.1B | 18.74 | ¥190.51 | +2.13% |
| 7734.T | ¥2,855.00 | -0.52% | 131.8B | 16.67 | ¥172.17 | +1.39% |
| 9740.T | ¥2,315.00 | +2.66% | 33.2B | 10.30 | ¥222.13 | +2.62% |
| 1909.T | ¥4,940.00 | -2.18% | 32.8B | 9.70 | ¥503.98 | +1.12% |
| 6809.T | ¥997.00 | -0.80% | 30.2B | 22.71 | ¥44.21 | +3.98% |
| 9686.T | ¥1,379.00 | +3.45% | 13.9B | 20.07 | ¥67.03 | +2.97% |
| 6797.T | ¥1,098.00 | +0.00% | 12.9B | 6.58 | ¥166.63 | +3.88% |
| 6870.T | ¥1,675.00 | -0.42% | 9.4B | 8.40 | ¥199.07 | +4.42% |
Stock Comparison
9735.T vs 2331.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 2331.T has a market cap of 486.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 2331.T trades at ¥1,003.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 2331.T's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2331.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is more volatile compared to 2331.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 6744.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 6744.T has a market cap of 210.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 6744.T trades at ¥3,775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 6744.T's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6744.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 6744.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 7734.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 7734.T has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 7734.T trades at ¥2,855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 7734.T's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7734.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 7734.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 9740.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 9740.T has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 9740.T trades at ¥2,315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 9740.T's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9740.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 9740.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 1909.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 1909.T has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 1909.T trades at ¥4,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 1909.T's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1909.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 1909.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 6809.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 6809.T has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 6809.T trades at ¥997.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 6809.T's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6809.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 6809.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 9686.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 9686.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 9686.T trades at ¥1,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 9686.T's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9686.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 9686.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 6797.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 6797.T has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 6797.T trades at ¥1,098.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 6797.T's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6797.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is more volatile compared to 6797.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 6870.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 6870.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 6870.T trades at ¥1,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 6870.T's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6870.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is more volatile compared to 6870.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 4264.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 4264.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 4264.T trades at ¥1,494.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 4264.T's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4264.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 4264.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 4754.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 4754.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 4754.T trades at ¥1,415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 4754.T's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4754.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is more volatile compared to 4754.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 7058.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 7058.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 7058.T trades at ¥2,509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 7058.T's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7058.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 7058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 7464.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 7464.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 7464.T trades at ¥1,602.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 7464.T's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7464.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is more volatile compared to 7464.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 7116.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 7116.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 7116.T trades at ¥771.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 7116.T's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7116.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is more volatile compared to 7116.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.
9735.T vs 3782.T Comparison
9735.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9735.T stands at 2.2T. In comparison, 3782.T has a market cap of 429.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9735.T is priced at ¥5,252.00, while 3782.T trades at ¥8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.46, whereas 3782.T's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 9735.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3782.T's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 9735.T is less volatile compared to 3782.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9735.T.