With us Corporation
With us Corporation 9696.T Peers
See (9696.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9696.T | ¥3,230.00 | +0.00% | 29.2B | 34.42 | ¥93.85 | +3.41% |
| 6200.T | ¥981.00 | -1.70% | 82.3B | 23.03 | ¥42.59 | +3.36% |
| 9733.T | ¥1,899.00 | +0.05% | 50B | 25.52 | ¥74.40 | +10.53% |
| 4718.T | ¥2,521.00 | +1.04% | 46.6B | 23.14 | ¥108.93 | +2.18% |
| 9470.T | ¥938.00 | +0.54% | 39.1B | 13.51 | ¥69.43 | +4.05% |
| 4714.T | ¥223.00 | +0.45% | 37.9B | 21.32 | ¥10.46 | +8.97% |
| 9795.T | ¥2,300.00 | -0.26% | 36.4B | 14.07 | ¥163.42 | +4.96% |
| 9769.T | ¥2,227.00 | +0.45% | 24.2B | 12.31 | ¥180.87 | +5.93% |
| 4745.T | ¥374.00 | +2.19% | 20.3B | 19.54 | ¥19.14 | +5.35% |
| 7030.T | ¥1,092.00 | +0.83% | 19.3B | 31.36 | ¥34.82 | +5.22% |
Stock Comparison
9696.T vs 6200.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 6200.T has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 6200.T trades at ¥981.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 6200.T's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6200.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 6200.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9733.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9733.T has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9733.T trades at ¥1,899.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9733.T's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9733.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9733.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4718.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4718.T has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4718.T trades at ¥2,521.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4718.T's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4718.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4718.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9470.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9470.T has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9470.T trades at ¥938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9470.T's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9470.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9470.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4714.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4714.T has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4714.T trades at ¥223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4714.T's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4714.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4714.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9795.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9795.T has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9795.T trades at ¥2,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9795.T's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9795.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9795.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9769.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9769.T has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9769.T trades at ¥2,227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9769.T's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9769.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9769.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4745.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4745.T has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4745.T trades at ¥374.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4745.T's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4745.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4745.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 7030.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 7030.T has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 7030.T trades at ¥1,092.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 7030.T's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7030.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 7030.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4668.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4668.T has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4668.T trades at ¥742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4668.T's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4668.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4668.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 2415.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 2415.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 2415.T trades at ¥1,656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 2415.T's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2415.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 2415.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9560.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9560.T has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9560.T trades at ¥1,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9560.T's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9560.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9560.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 2152.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 2152.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 2152.T trades at ¥1,324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 2152.T's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2152.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 2152.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4267.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4267.T has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4267.T trades at ¥2,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4267.T's P/E ratio is 55.24. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4267.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is more volatile compared to 4267.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 7084.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 7084.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 7084.T trades at ¥1,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 7084.T's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7084.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 7084.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 7353.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 7353.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 7353.T trades at ¥715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 7353.T's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7353.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 7353.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 2464.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 2464.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 2464.T trades at ¥351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 2464.T's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2464.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 2464.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9778.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9778.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9778.T trades at ¥7,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9778.T's P/E ratio is 74.07. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9778.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is more volatile compared to 9778.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 2179.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 2179.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 2179.T trades at ¥747.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 2179.T's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2179.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 2179.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4319.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4319.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4319.T trades at ¥224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4319.T's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4319.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4319.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9345.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9345.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9345.T trades at ¥2,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9345.T's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9345.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9345.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4645.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4645.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4645.T trades at ¥421.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4645.T's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4645.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4645.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 6096.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 6096.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 6096.T trades at ¥356.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 6096.T's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6096.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 6096.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4705.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4705.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4705.T trades at ¥810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4705.T's P/E ratio is 71.87. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4705.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4705.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9256.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9256.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9256.T trades at ¥796.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9256.T's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9256.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9256.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4735.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4735.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4735.T trades at ¥333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4735.T's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4735.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4735.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9339.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9339.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9339.T trades at ¥959.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9339.T's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9339.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9339.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 7073.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 7073.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 7073.T trades at ¥2,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 7073.T's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7073.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 7073.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 3998.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 3998.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 3998.T trades at ¥345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 3998.T's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3998.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 3998.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9562.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9562.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9562.T trades at ¥1,908.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9562.T's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9562.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 9562.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4678.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4678.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4678.T trades at ¥301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4678.T's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4678.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4678.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 184A.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 184A.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 184A.T trades at ¥568.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 184A.T's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 184A.T's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 184A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 4720.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 4720.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 4720.T trades at ¥228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 4720.T's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4720.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is less volatile compared to 4720.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.
9696.T vs 9783.T Comparison
9696.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.T stands at 29.2B. In comparison, 9783.T has a market cap of 15.6K. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.T is priced at ¥3,230.00, while 9783.T trades at ¥2,592.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.42, whereas 9783.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9696.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9783.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.T is more volatile compared to 9783.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.T.