Greenland Resort Company Limited

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6417.T has a market cap of 625.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 6417.T trades at ¥2,838.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 6417.T's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6417.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 6417.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 6417.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 4681.T has a market cap of 404.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 4681.T trades at ¥1,903.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 4681.T's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4681.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 4681.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 4681.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 2767.T has a market cap of 150.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 2767.T trades at ¥2,383.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 2767.T's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2767.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 2767.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 2767.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 9672.T has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 9672.T trades at ¥5,070.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 9672.T's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9672.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 9672.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 9672.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6419.T has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 6419.T trades at ¥3,015.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 6419.T's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6419.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 6419.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 6419.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 5261.T has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 5261.T trades at ¥5,230.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 5261.T's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5261.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 5261.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 5261.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6040.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 6040.T trades at ¥522.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 6040.T's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6040.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 6040.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 6040.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6257.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 6257.T trades at ¥1,064.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 6257.T's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6257.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 6257.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 6257.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 2378.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 2378.T trades at ¥1,162.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 2378.T's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2378.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is less volatile compared to 2378.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 2378.T's competition here

9656.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9656.T stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 9675.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9656.T is priced at ¥616.00, while 9675.T trades at ¥1,643.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9656.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas 9675.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9656.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9675.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9656.T is more volatile compared to 9675.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9656.T.Check 9675.T's competition here