Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited
Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited Fundamental Analysis
Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited (9639.HK) shows moderate financial fundamentals with a PE ratio of 14.73, profit margin of 7.71%, and ROE of 25.30%. The company generates $1.0B in annual revenue with N/A year-over-year growth of N/A.
Key Strengths
Areas of Concern
The stock receives a Fundamental Health Score of 66.4/100 based on profitability, valuation, growth, and balance sheet metrics. The C+ grade reflects average fundamentals, with notable risks in certain areas.
Fundamental Health Score
We analyze 9639.HK's fundamental strength across five key dimensions:
Efficiency Score
Excellent9639.HK demonstrates superior asset utilization.
Valuation Score
Excellent9639.HK trades at attractive valuation levels.
Growth Score
Moderate9639.HK shows steady but slowing expansion.
Financial Health Score
Excellent9639.HK maintains a strong and stable balance sheet.
Profitability Score
Weak9639.HK struggles to sustain strong margins.
Key Financial Metrics
Is 9639.HK Expensive or Cheap?
P/E Ratio
9639.HK trades at 14.73 times earnings. This suggests potential undervaluation.
PEG Ratio
When adjusting for growth, 9639.HK's PEG of 0.15 indicates potential undervaluation.
Price to Book
The market values Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited at 2.97 times its book value. This may indicate undervaluation.
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise value stands at 8.25 times EBITDA. This is generally considered low.
How Well Does 9639.HK Make Money?
Net Profit Margin
For every $100 in sales, Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited keeps $7.71 as profit after all expenses.
Operating Margin
Core operations generate 11.32 in profit for every $100 in revenue, before interest and taxes.
ROE
Management delivers $25.30 in profit for every $100 of shareholder equity.
ROA
Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited generates $12.22 in profit for every $100 in assets, demonstrating efficient asset deployment.
Following the Money - Real Cash Generation
Operating Cash Flow
Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited generates limited operating cash flow of $-31.69M, signaling weaker underlying cash strength.
Free Cash Flow
Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited generates weak or negative free cash flow of $-130.11M, restricting financial flexibility.
FCF Per Share
Each share generates $-0.13 in free cash annually.
FCF Yield
9639.HK converts -11.83% of its market value into free cash.
Financial Ratios Analysis
Valuation Ratios
P/E Ratio
Price to earnings ratio
14.73
vs 25 benchmark
PEG Ratio
Price/earnings to growth ratio
0.15
vs 25 benchmark
P/B Ratio
Price to book value ratio
2.97
vs 25 benchmark
P/S Ratio
Price to sales ratio
1.14
vs 25 benchmark
Financial Health
Debt/Equity
Total debt to shareholders' equity
0.24
vs 25 benchmark
Current Ratio
Current assets to current liabilities
2.15
vs 25 benchmark
Efficiency Ratios
ROE
Return on equity percentage
0.25
vs 25 benchmark
ROA
Return on assets percentage
0.12
vs 25 benchmark
ROCE
Return on capital employed
0.27
vs 25 benchmark
How 9639.HK Stacks Against Its Sector Peers
| Metric | 9639.HK Value | Sector Average | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 14.73 | 25.85 | Better (Cheaper) |
| ROE | 25.30% | 1270.00% | Weak |
| Net Margin | 7.71% | -41768.00% (disorted) | Weak |
| Debt/Equity | 0.24 | 0.79 | Strong (Low Leverage) |
| Current Ratio | 2.15 | 10.04 | Strong Liquidity |
| ROA | 12.22% | -1493983.00% (disorted) | Strong |
9639.HK outperforms its industry in 4 out of 6 key metrics, particularly excelling in ROA, but lagging in ROE.
Historical Growth Performance
5-Year Growth Trajectory
This section reviews Wing Lee Development Construction Holdings Limited's 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and compares its performance against the typical investment style of its industry.
Revenue CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
EPS CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
FCF CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure