Bookoff Group Holdings Limited
Bookoff Group Holdings Limited (9278.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9278.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9278.T | ¥1,787.00 | +0.22% | 31.4B | 17.09 | ¥104.59 | +1.40% |
| 4755.T | ¥723.10 | +0.03% | 1.6T | -8.79 | -¥82.25 | N/A |
| 9843.T | ¥2,517.50 | -1.00% | 1.4T | 18.03 | ¥139.61 | +1.10% |
| 8136.T | ¥979.20 | -0.12% | 1.2T | 23.98 | ¥40.83 | +1.07% |
| 3092.T | ¥1,099.00 | -1.26% | 977.2B | 21.73 | ¥50.86 | +3.16% |
| 3064.T | ¥1,700.00 | -1.45% | 847.2B | 26.15 | ¥65.21 | +1.72% |
| 4385.T | ¥3,671.00 | -0.89% | 605.3B | 21.13 | ¥173.72 | N/A |
| 9831.T | ¥529.50 | +0.59% | 346.6B | 13.49 | ¥38.85 | +2.58% |
| 7419.T | ¥1,085.00 | +0.56% | 313.6B | 8.91 | ¥121.82 | +1.29% |
| 3048.T | ¥1,725.50 | -0.09% | 295.4B | 16.91 | ¥102.07 | +2.26% |
Stock Comparison
9278.T vs 4755.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 4755.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 4755.T trades at ¥723.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 4755.T's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4755.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 4755.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 4755.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9843.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9843.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9843.T trades at ¥2,517.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9843.T's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9843.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 9843.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9843.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8136.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8136.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8136.T trades at ¥979.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8136.T's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8136.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 8136.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8136.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3092.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3092.T has a market cap of 977.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3092.T trades at ¥1,099.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3092.T's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3092.T's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3092.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3092.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3064.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3064.T has a market cap of 847.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3064.T trades at ¥1,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3064.T's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3064.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3064.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3064.T's competition here
9278.T vs 4385.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 4385.T has a market cap of 605.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 4385.T trades at ¥3,671.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 4385.T's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4385.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 4385.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 4385.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9831.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9831.T has a market cap of 346.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9831.T trades at ¥529.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9831.T's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9831.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9831.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9831.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7419.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7419.T has a market cap of 313.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7419.T trades at ¥1,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7419.T's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7419.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 7419.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7419.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3048.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3048.T has a market cap of 295.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3048.T trades at ¥1,725.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3048.T's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3048.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3048.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3048.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8022.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8022.T has a market cap of 258.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8022.T trades at ¥3,370.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8022.T's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8022.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 8022.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8022.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8282.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8282.T has a market cap of 258.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8282.T trades at ¥1,692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8282.T's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8282.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 8282.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8282.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2730.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2730.T has a market cap of 228.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2730.T trades at ¥2,169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2730.T's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2730.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2730.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2730.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7685.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7685.T has a market cap of 187.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7685.T trades at ¥3,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7685.T's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7685.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 7685.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7685.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7545.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7545.T has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7545.T trades at ¥2,107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7545.T's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7545.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7545.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7545.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9832.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9832.T has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9832.T trades at ¥1,566.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9832.T's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9832.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9832.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9832.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7552.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7552.T has a market cap of 118B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7552.T trades at ¥2,744.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7552.T's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7552.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7552.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7552.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9842.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9842.T has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9842.T trades at ¥1,796.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9842.T's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9842.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9842.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9842.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3964.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3964.T has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3964.T trades at ¥1,211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3964.T's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3964.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3964.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3964.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2678.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2678.T has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2678.T trades at ¥1,111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2678.T's P/E ratio is -67.91. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2678.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2678.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2678.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9422.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9422.T has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9422.T trades at ¥1,912.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9422.T's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9422.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9422.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9422.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9997.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9997.T has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9997.T trades at ¥870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9997.T's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9997.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9997.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9997.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3028.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3028.T has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3028.T trades at ¥2,058.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3028.T's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3028.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3028.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3028.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2681.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2681.T has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2681.T trades at ¥1,721.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2681.T's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2681.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2681.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2681.T's competition here
9278.T vs 6058.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 6058.T has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 6058.T trades at ¥1,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 6058.T's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6058.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 6058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 6058.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3328.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3328.T has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3328.T trades at ¥3,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3328.T's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3328.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3328.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3328.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2751.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2751.T has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2751.T trades at ¥3,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2751.T's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2751.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2751.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2751.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8005.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8005.T has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8005.T trades at ¥1,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8005.T's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8005.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 8005.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8005.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3660.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3660.T has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3660.T trades at ¥421.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3660.T's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3660.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3660.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3660.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8281.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8281.T has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8281.T trades at ¥992.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8281.T's P/E ratio is -50.92. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8281.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 8281.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8281.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3093.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3093.T has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3093.T trades at ¥1,697.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3093.T's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3093.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3093.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3093.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9441.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9441.T has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9441.T trades at ¥2,939.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9441.T's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9441.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9441.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9441.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3333.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3333.T has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3333.T trades at ¥1,338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3333.T's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3333.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3333.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3333.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7455.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7455.T has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7455.T trades at ¥578.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7455.T's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7455.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7455.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7455.T's competition here
9278.T vs 4449.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 4449.T has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 4449.T trades at ¥1,117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 4449.T's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4449.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 4449.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 4449.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3159.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3159.T has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3159.T trades at ¥345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3159.T's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3159.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3159.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3159.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2674.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2674.T has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2674.T trades at ¥1,953.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2674.T's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2674.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2674.T's competition here
9278.T vs 6061.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 6061.T has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 6061.T trades at ¥2,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 6061.T's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6061.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 6061.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 6061.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3179.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3179.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3179.T trades at ¥1,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3179.T's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3179.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3179.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3179.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9270.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9270.T has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9270.T trades at ¥1,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9270.T's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9270.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 9270.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9270.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3542.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3542.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3542.T trades at ¥1,711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3542.T's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3542.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3542.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3542.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3558.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3558.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3558.T trades at ¥1,473.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3558.T's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3558.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3558.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3558.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7110.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7110.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7110.T trades at ¥1,987.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7110.T's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7110.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7110.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7110.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2484.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2484.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2484.T trades at ¥130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2484.T's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2484.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2484.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2484.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9272.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9272.T has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9272.T trades at ¥1,446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9272.T's P/E ratio is 114.31. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9272.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 9272.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9272.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8202.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8202.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8202.T trades at ¥151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8202.T's P/E ratio is -137.27. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8202.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 8202.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8202.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3031.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3031.T has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3031.T trades at ¥658.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3031.T's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3031.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3031.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3031.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3556.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3556.T has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3556.T trades at ¥904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3556.T's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3556.T's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3556.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3556.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7636.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7636.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7636.T trades at ¥794.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7636.T's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7636.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7636.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8289.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8289.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8289.T trades at ¥457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8289.T's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8289.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 8289.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8289.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7514.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7514.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7514.T trades at ¥852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7514.T's P/E ratio is 916.13. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7514.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7514.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7514.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2652.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2652.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2652.T trades at ¥320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2652.T's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2652.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 2652.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2652.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7442.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7442.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7442.T trades at ¥458.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7442.T's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7442.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7442.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7442.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7610.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7610.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7610.T trades at ¥138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7610.T's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7610.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 7610.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7610.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9927.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9927.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9927.T trades at ¥970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9927.T's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9927.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9927.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9927.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3560.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3560.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3560.T trades at ¥3,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3560.T's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3560.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3560.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3560.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3134.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3134.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3134.T trades at ¥500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3134.T's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3134.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3134.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3134.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3319.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3319.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3319.T trades at ¥425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3319.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3319.T's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3319.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3319.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2769.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2769.T has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2769.T trades at ¥956.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2769.T's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2769.T's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2769.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2769.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8165.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8165.T has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8165.T trades at ¥134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8165.T's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8165.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 8165.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8165.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3396.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3396.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3396.T trades at ¥890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3396.T's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3396.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3396.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3396.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8230.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8230.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8230.T trades at ¥326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8230.T's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8230.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 8230.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8230.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7695.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7695.T has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7695.T trades at ¥780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7695.T's P/E ratio is 80.16. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7695.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7695.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7695.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3135.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3135.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3135.T trades at ¥1,063.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3135.T's P/E ratio is 52.96. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3135.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3135.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3135.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3058.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3058.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3058.T trades at ¥682.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3058.T's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3058.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3058.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3172.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3172.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3172.T trades at ¥1,131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3172.T's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3172.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3172.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3172.T's competition here
9278.T vs 4937.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 4937.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 4937.T trades at ¥1,372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 4937.T's P/E ratio is 112.09. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4937.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 4937.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 4937.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9854.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9854.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9854.T trades at ¥240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9854.T's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9854.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 9854.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9854.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3726.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3726.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3726.T trades at ¥422.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3726.T's P/E ratio is -17.84. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3726.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3726.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3726.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7501.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7501.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7501.T trades at ¥1,781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7501.T's P/E ratio is -34.15. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7501.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7501.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7501.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3190.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3190.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3190.T trades at ¥570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3190.T's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3190.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3190.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3190.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3185.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3185.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3185.T trades at ¥215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3185.T's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3185.T's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3185.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3185.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3059.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3059.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3059.T trades at ¥799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3059.T's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3059.T's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3059.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3059.T's competition here
9278.T vs 373A.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 373A.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 373A.T trades at ¥1,517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 373A.T's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 373A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 373A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 373A.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3138.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3138.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3138.T trades at ¥1,079.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3138.T's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3138.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3138.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3138.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3195.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3195.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3195.T trades at ¥404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3195.T's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3195.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3195.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3195.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3181.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3181.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3181.T trades at ¥879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3181.T's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3181.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3181.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3181.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3177.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3177.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3177.T trades at ¥3,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3177.T's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3177.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3177.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3177.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7640.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7640.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7640.T trades at ¥201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7640.T's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7640.T's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7640.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3071.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3071.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3071.T trades at ¥105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3071.T's P/E ratio is -77.78. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3071.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3071.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3071.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7477.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7477.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7477.T trades at ¥1,866.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7477.T's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7477.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 7477.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7477.T's competition here
9278.T vs 8225.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 8225.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 8225.T trades at ¥3,290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 8225.T's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8225.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 8225.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 8225.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2666.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2666.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2666.T trades at ¥154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2666.T's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2666.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2666.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2666.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3192.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3192.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3192.T trades at ¥325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3192.T's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3192.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3192.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3192.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9444.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9444.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9444.T trades at ¥333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9444.T's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9444.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9444.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9444.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9978.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9978.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9978.T trades at ¥47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9978.T's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9978.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 9978.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9978.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9557.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9557.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9557.T trades at ¥227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9557.T's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9557.T's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 9557.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9557.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3779.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3779.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3779.T trades at ¥154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3779.T's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3779.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is less volatile compared to 3779.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3779.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2673.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2673.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2673.T trades at ¥172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2673.T's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2673.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2673.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2673.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3416.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3416.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3416.T trades at ¥889.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3416.T's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3416.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3416.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3416.T's competition here
9278.T vs 9425.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 9425.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 9425.T trades at ¥289.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 9425.T's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9425.T's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 9425.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 9425.T's competition here
9278.T vs 4017.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 4017.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 4017.T trades at ¥225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 4017.T's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4017.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 4017.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 4017.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3174.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3174.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3174.T trades at ¥566.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3174.T's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3174.T's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3174.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3174.T's competition here
9278.T vs 7618.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 7618.T has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 7618.T trades at ¥479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 7618.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7618.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 7618.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 7618.T's competition here
9278.T vs 2729.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 2729.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 2729.T trades at ¥2,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 2729.T's P/E ratio is -87.28. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2729.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 2729.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 2729.T's competition here
9278.T vs 3658.T Comparison April 2026
9278.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9278.T stands at 31.4B. In comparison, 3658.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 9278.T is priced at ¥1,787.00, while 3658.T trades at ¥4,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9278.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.09, whereas 3658.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9278.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3658.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9278.T is more volatile compared to 3658.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9278.T.Check 3658.T's competition here