GENDA Inc.
GENDA Inc. (9166.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9166.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9166.T | ¥627.00 | +7.36% | 109.6B | 28.44 | ¥20.85 | N/A |
| 4661.T | ¥2,738.00 | +3.81% | 4.4T | 34.94 | ¥77.28 | +0.47% |
| 7832.T | ¥3,972.00 | +3.95% | 2.5T | 19.69 | ¥196.40 | +1.63% |
| 7309.T | ¥16,755.00 | +1.98% | 1.4T | 42.37 | ¥387.82 | +1.85% |
| 7731.T | ¥1,965.00 | +3.42% | 621.5B | 74.16 | ¥25.46 | +1.96% |
| 7951.T | ¥1,137.50 | +3.64% | 493.5B | 28.66 | ¥38.48 | +2.12% |
| 8114.T | ¥4,335.00 | -0.23% | 327.6B | 0.00 | ¥2,097,244,930.00 | +1.11% |
| 8111.T | ¥2,266.00 | +3.59% | 303.1B | 12.77 | ¥173.25 | +2.36% |
| 7906.T | ¥3,055.00 | +4.23% | 252.8B | 21.90 | ¥134.94 | +0.73% |
| 7867.T | ¥2,738.00 | +6.00% | 231.3B | 14.51 | ¥179.37 | +2.21% |
Stock Comparison
9166.T vs 4661.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 4661.T has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 4661.T trades at ¥2,738.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 4661.T's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4661.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 4661.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 4661.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7832.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7832.T has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7832.T trades at ¥3,972.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7832.T's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7832.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7832.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7832.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7309.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7309.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7309.T trades at ¥16,755.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7309.T's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7309.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7309.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7309.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7731.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7731.T has a market cap of 621.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7731.T trades at ¥1,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7731.T's P/E ratio is 74.16. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7731.T's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7731.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7731.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7951.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7951.T has a market cap of 493.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7951.T trades at ¥1,137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7951.T's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7951.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7951.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7951.T's competition here
9166.T vs 8114.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 8114.T has a market cap of 327.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 8114.T trades at ¥4,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 8114.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8114.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 8114.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 8114.T's competition here
9166.T vs 8111.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 8111.T has a market cap of 303.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 8111.T trades at ¥2,266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 8111.T's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8111.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 8111.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 8111.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7906.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7906.T has a market cap of 252.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7906.T trades at ¥3,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7906.T's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7906.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7906.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7906.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7867.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7867.T has a market cap of 231.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7867.T trades at ¥2,738.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7867.T's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7867.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7867.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7867.T's competition here
9166.T vs 4680.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 4680.T has a market cap of 214.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 4680.T trades at ¥841.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 4680.T's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4680.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 4680.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 4680.T's competition here
9166.T vs 6412.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 6412.T has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 6412.T trades at ¥1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 6412.T's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6412.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 6412.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 6412.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7458.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7458.T has a market cap of 174.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7458.T trades at ¥1,719.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7458.T's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7458.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7458.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7458.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7740.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7740.T has a market cap of 159.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7740.T trades at ¥1,024.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7740.T's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7740.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7740.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7740.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7944.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7944.T has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7944.T trades at ¥3,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7944.T's P/E ratio is 46.86. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7944.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7944.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7944.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7839.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7839.T has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7839.T trades at ¥1,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7839.T's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7839.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7839.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7839.T's competition here
9166.T vs 9603.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 9603.T has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 9603.T trades at ¥1,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 9603.T's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9603.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 9603.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 9603.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7085.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7085.T has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7085.T trades at ¥762.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7085.T's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7085.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7085.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7085.T's competition here
9166.T vs 6425.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 6425.T has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 6425.T trades at ¥700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 6425.T's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6425.T's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 6425.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 6425.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7816.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7816.T has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7816.T trades at ¥1,247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7816.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7816.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7816.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7816.T's competition here
9166.T vs 4343.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 4343.T has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 4343.T trades at ¥2,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 4343.T's P/E ratio is -105.75. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4343.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 4343.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 4343.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7990.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7990.T has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7990.T trades at ¥2,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7990.T's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7990.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7990.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7990.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7092.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7092.T has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7092.T trades at ¥2,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7092.T's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7092.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7092.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7092.T's competition here
9166.T vs 6238.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 6238.T has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 6238.T trades at ¥1,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 6238.T's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6238.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 6238.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 6238.T's competition here
9166.T vs 8920.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 8920.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 8920.T trades at ¥878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 8920.T's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8920.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 8920.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 8920.T's competition here
9166.T vs 4801.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 4801.T has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 4801.T trades at ¥2,394.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 4801.T's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4801.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 4801.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 4801.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7952.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7952.T has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7952.T trades at ¥2,978.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7952.T's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7952.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7952.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7952.T's competition here
9166.T vs 2340.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 2340.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 2340.T trades at ¥485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 2340.T's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2340.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 2340.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 2340.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7608.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7608.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7608.T trades at ¥776.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7608.T's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7608.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7608.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7608.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7809.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7809.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7809.T trades at ¥1,356.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7809.T's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7809.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7809.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7809.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7841.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7841.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7841.T trades at ¥1,128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7841.T's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7841.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is less volatile compared to 7841.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7841.T's competition here
9166.T vs 6819.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 6819.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 6819.T trades at ¥472.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 6819.T's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6819.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 6819.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 6819.T's competition here
9166.T vs 8135.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 8135.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 8135.T trades at ¥455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 8135.T's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8135.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 8135.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 8135.T's competition here
9166.T vs 6570.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 6570.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 6570.T trades at ¥1,179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 6570.T's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6570.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 6570.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 6570.T's competition here
9166.T vs 2330.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 2330.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 2330.T trades at ¥113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 2330.T's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2330.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 2330.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 2330.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7847.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7847.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7847.T trades at ¥619.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7847.T's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7847.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7847.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7847.T's competition here
9166.T vs 3326.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 3326.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 3326.T trades at ¥683.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 3326.T's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3326.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 3326.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 3326.T's competition here
9166.T vs 6074.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 6074.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 6074.T trades at ¥515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 6074.T's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6074.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 6074.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 6074.T's competition here
9166.T vs 7865.T Comparison April 2026
9166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9166.T stands at 109.6B. In comparison, 7865.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9166.T is priced at ¥627.00, while 7865.T trades at ¥415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.44, whereas 7865.T's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, 9166.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7865.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9166.T is more volatile compared to 7865.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9166.T.Check 7865.T's competition here