Great Western Mining Corporation PLC

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, XVALO.MC has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while XVALO.MC trades at €8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas XVALO.MC's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XVALO.MC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR and XVALO.MC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XVALO.MC's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, ERA.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while ERA.PA trades at €52.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ERA.PA's P/E ratio is 105.50. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERA.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR is less volatile compared to ERA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8GW.IR.Check ERA.PA's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, AMG.AS has a market cap of 793.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while AMG.AS trades at €24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas AMG.AS's P/E ratio is -74.48. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMG.AS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR is less volatile compared to AMG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8GW.IR.Check AMG.AS's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, KMR.IR has a market cap of 318.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while KMR.IR trades at €3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas KMR.IR's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KMR.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR is less volatile compared to KMR.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8GW.IR.Check KMR.IR's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, RX.PA has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while RX.PA trades at €1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas RX.PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RX.PA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR is less volatile compared to RX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8GW.IR.Check RX.PA's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, MLZAM.PA has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while MLZAM.PA trades at €1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MLZAM.PA's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLZAM.PA's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR and MLZAM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLZAM.PA's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, NYR.BR has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while NYR.BR trades at €0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas NYR.BR's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NYR.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR is less volatile compared to NYR.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8GW.IR.Check NYR.BR's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, ORQ1.IR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while ORQ1.IR trades at €0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ORQ1.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ORQ1.IR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR is less volatile compared to ORQ1.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8GW.IR.Check ORQ1.IR's competition here

8GW.IR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 8GW.IR stands at 2M. In comparison, MLSUM.PA has a market cap of 102K. Regarding current trading prices, 8GW.IR is priced at €0.01, while MLSUM.PA trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

8GW.IR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MLSUM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 8GW.IR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLSUM.PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8GW.IR and MLSUM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLSUM.PA's competition here