SYLA Holdings Co., Ltd.
SYLA Holdings Co., Ltd. (8887.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (8887.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8887.T | ¥384.00 | -1.79% | 15.9B | 4.49 | ¥85.55 | +1.92% |
| 1925.T | ¥4,929.00 | -0.22% | 3.1T | 10.02 | ¥491.90 | +3.02% |
| 2983.T | ¥1,495.00 | -8.56% | 255.3B | 8.52 | ¥175.44 | +3.98% |
| 8871.T | ¥3,340.00 | +0.30% | 111B | 18.13 | ¥184.21 | +3.25% |
| 3480.T | ¥4,750.00 | -0.11% | 100.1B | 19.51 | ¥243.46 | +2.21% |
| 8897.T | ¥396.00 | +0.51% | 53.8B | 6.38 | ¥62.11 | +6.83% |
| 3299.T | ¥2,197.00 | -3.09% | 51.4B | 7.75 | ¥283.38 | +4.41% |
| 1847.T | ¥2,623.00 | -1.50% | 38.1B | 7.29 | ¥359.60 | +2.64% |
| 1814.T | ¥3,610.00 | -2.96% | 37.5B | 12.68 | ¥284.61 | +3.72% |
| 146A.T | ¥3,785.00 | -4.30% | 29.2B | 7.62 | ¥496.75 | +1.97% |
Stock Comparison
8887.T vs 1925.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 1925.T has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 1925.T trades at ¥4,929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 1925.T's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 1925.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 1925.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 1925.T's competition here
8887.T vs 2983.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 2983.T has a market cap of 255.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 2983.T trades at ¥1,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 2983.T's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 2983.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 2983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 2983.T's competition here
8887.T vs 8871.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 8871.T has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 8871.T trades at ¥3,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 8871.T's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 8871.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 8871.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 8871.T's competition here
8887.T vs 3480.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 3480.T has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 3480.T trades at ¥4,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 3480.T's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 3480.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 3480.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 3480.T's competition here
8887.T vs 8897.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 8897.T has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 8897.T trades at ¥396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 8897.T's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 8897.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 8897.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 8897.T's competition here
8887.T vs 3299.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 3299.T has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 3299.T trades at ¥2,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 3299.T's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 3299.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is more volatile compared to 3299.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 3299.T's competition here
8887.T vs 1847.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 1847.T has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 1847.T trades at ¥2,623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 1847.T's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 1847.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 1847.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 1847.T's competition here
8887.T vs 1814.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 1814.T has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 1814.T trades at ¥3,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 1814.T's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 1814.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 1814.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 1814.T's competition here
8887.T vs 146A.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 146A.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 146A.T trades at ¥3,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 146A.T's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 146A.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 146A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 146A.T's competition here
8887.T vs 2981.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 2981.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 2981.T trades at ¥2,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 2981.T's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 2981.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 2981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 2981.T's competition here
8887.T vs 3293.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 3293.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 3293.T trades at ¥783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 3293.T's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 3293.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is more volatile compared to 3293.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 3293.T's competition here
8887.T vs 2984.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 2984.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 2984.T trades at ¥695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 2984.T's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 2984.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 2984.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 2984.T's competition here
8887.T vs 1451.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 1451.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 1451.T trades at ¥1,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 1451.T's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 1451.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is more volatile compared to 1451.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 1451.T's competition here
8887.T vs 8886.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 8886.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 8886.T trades at ¥1,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 8886.T's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 8886.T's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is more volatile compared to 8886.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 8886.T's competition here
8887.T vs 7837.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 7837.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 7837.T trades at ¥338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 7837.T's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 7837.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is less volatile compared to 7837.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 7837.T's competition here
8887.T vs 1757.T Comparison April 2026
8887.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8887.T stands at 15.9B. In comparison, 1757.T has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8887.T is priced at ¥384.00, while 1757.T trades at ¥1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8887.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.49, whereas 1757.T's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 8887.T's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 1757.T's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 8887.T is more volatile compared to 1757.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8887.T.Check 1757.T's competition here