Satu Holdings Limited
Satu Holdings Limited (8392.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (8392.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8392.HK | HK$0.04 | -8.89% | 45M | -4.50 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 0300.HK | HK$83.80 | +3.08% | 595.1B | 11.90 | HK$6.59 | +5.56% |
| 6690.HK | HK$20.72 | -5.30% | 190.9B | 8.70 | HK$2.38 | +6.50% |
| 0921.HK | HK$19.80 | -5.62% | 31.6B | 7.01 | HK$2.80 | +6.86% |
| 1999.HK | HK$4.31 | -1.37% | 16.8B | 8.15 | HK$0.53 | +6.25% |
| 1691.HK | HK$1.74 | +2.35% | 5.8B | -33.80 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 2549.HK | HK$4.94 | +9.78% | 2.7B | 9.17 | HK$0.53 | +2.90% |
| 0837.HK | HK$7.47 | +3.75% | 1.8B | 8.79 | HK$0.84 | +4.96% |
| 2519.HK | HK$4.38 | +0.23% | 1.8B | 4.56 | HK$0.96 | N/A |
| 0531.HK | HK$0.48 | -1.04% | 1.4B | 47.50 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
8392.HK vs 0300.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0300.HK has a market cap of 595.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0300.HK trades at HK$83.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0300.HK's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0300.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0300.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0300.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 6690.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 6690.HK has a market cap of 190.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 6690.HK trades at HK$20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 6690.HK's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 6690.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 6690.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 6690.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0921.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0921.HK has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0921.HK trades at HK$19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0921.HK's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0921.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0921.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0921.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1999.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1999.HK has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1999.HK trades at HK$4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1999.HK's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1999.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1999.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1999.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1691.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1691.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1691.HK trades at HK$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1691.HK's P/E ratio is -33.80. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1691.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1691.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1691.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 2549.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 2549.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2549.HK trades at HK$4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 2549.HK's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2549.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 2549.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 2549.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0837.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0837.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0837.HK trades at HK$7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0837.HK's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0837.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0837.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0837.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 2519.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 2519.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2519.HK trades at HK$4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 2519.HK's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2519.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK and 2519.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 2519.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0531.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0531.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0531.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0531.HK's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0531.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0531.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0531.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1373.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1373.HK has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1373.HK trades at HK$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1373.HK's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1373.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1373.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1373.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0229.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0229.HK has a market cap of 431.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0229.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0229.HK's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0229.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0229.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0229.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 2619.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 2619.HK has a market cap of 366.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2619.HK trades at HK$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 2619.HK's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2619.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 2619.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 2619.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1418.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1418.HK has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1418.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1418.HK's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1418.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1418.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1418.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 2222.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 2222.HK has a market cap of 329.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2222.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 2222.HK's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2222.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 2222.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 2222.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0776.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0776.HK has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0776.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0776.HK's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0776.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0776.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0776.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 6822.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 6822.HK has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 6822.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 6822.HK's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 6822.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 6822.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 6822.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 2381.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 2381.HK has a market cap of 278M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2381.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 2381.HK's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2381.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK and 2381.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 2381.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1198.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1198.HK has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1198.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1198.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1198.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK and 1198.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1198.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0396.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0396.HK has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0396.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0396.HK's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0396.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0396.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0396.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1715.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1715.HK has a market cap of 205.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1715.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1715.HK's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1715.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1715.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1715.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1575.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1575.HK has a market cap of 179.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1575.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1575.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1575.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1575.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1575.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0684.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0684.HK has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0684.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0684.HK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0684.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK and 0684.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0684.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 8125.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 8125.HK has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8125.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 8125.HK's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8125.HK's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 8125.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 8125.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 8118.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 8118.HK has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8118.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 8118.HK's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8118.HK's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK and 8118.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8118.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 2127.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 2127.HK has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2127.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 2127.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2127.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 2127.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 2127.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1237.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1237.HK has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1237.HK trades at HK$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1237.HK's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1237.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1237.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1237.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 8547.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 8547.HK has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8547.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 8547.HK's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8547.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 8547.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 8547.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 8222.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 8222.HK has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8222.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 8222.HK's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8222.HK's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 8222.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 8222.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 0449.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 0449.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0449.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0449.HK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0449.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 0449.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 0449.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 1678.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 1678.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1678.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 1678.HK's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1678.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 1678.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 1678.HK's competition here
8392.HK vs 8101.HK Comparison April 2026
8392.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8392.HK stands at 45M. In comparison, 8101.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 8392.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8101.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8392.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 8101.HK's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, 8392.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8101.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 8392.HK is less volatile compared to 8101.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8392.HK.Check 8101.HK's competition here