Heiwado Co.,Ltd.
Heiwado Co.,Ltd. (8276.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (8276.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Department Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8276.T | ¥2,914.00 | +1.22% | 145.5B | 13.64 | ¥213.62 | +2.06% |
| 8267.T | ¥4,833.00 | +0.12% | 4.4T | 143.71 | ¥33.63 | +0.74% |
| 7453.T | ¥7,170.00 | +0.56% | 1.9T | 36.75 | ¥195.08 | +0.59% |
| 9005.T | ¥1,706.00 | +0.74% | 980.2B | 12.66 | ¥134.80 | +1.41% |
| 3099.T | ¥2,155.50 | -0.16% | 787.7B | 15.15 | ¥142.28 | +2.51% |
| 3086.T | ¥2,047.50 | +0.34% | 514.8B | 12.93 | ¥158.34 | +2.15% |
| 8233.T | ¥1,166.50 | -0.34% | 353.9B | 12.66 | ¥92.12 | +2.83% |
| 8242.T | ¥1,996.50 | -0.03% | 244B | 6.90 | ¥289.17 | +2.00% |
| 8273.T | ¥3,192.00 | +0.95% | 225.3B | 18.96 | ¥168.37 | +2.82% |
| 2659.T | ¥3,010.00 | +0.47% | 186.1B | 16.02 | ¥187.85 | +2.66% |
Stock Comparison
8276.T vs 8267.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8267.T has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8267.T trades at ¥4,833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8267.T's P/E ratio is 143.71. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8267.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8267.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8267.T's competition here
8276.T vs 7453.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 7453.T has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 7453.T trades at ¥7,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 7453.T's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7453.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is less volatile compared to 7453.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 7453.T's competition here
8276.T vs 9005.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 9005.T has a market cap of 980.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 9005.T trades at ¥1,706.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 9005.T's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9005.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 9005.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 9005.T's competition here
8276.T vs 3099.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 3099.T has a market cap of 787.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 3099.T trades at ¥2,155.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 3099.T's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3099.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 3099.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 3099.T's competition here
8276.T vs 3086.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 3086.T has a market cap of 514.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 3086.T trades at ¥2,047.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 3086.T's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3086.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is less volatile compared to 3086.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 3086.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8233.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8233.T has a market cap of 353.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8233.T trades at ¥1,166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8233.T's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8233.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8233.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8233.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8242.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8242.T has a market cap of 244B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8242.T trades at ¥1,996.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8242.T's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8242.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is less volatile compared to 8242.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8242.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8273.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8273.T has a market cap of 225.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8273.T trades at ¥3,192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8273.T's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8273.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8273.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8273.T's competition here
8276.T vs 2659.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 2659.T has a market cap of 186.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 2659.T trades at ¥3,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 2659.T's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2659.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 2659.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 2659.T's competition here
8276.T vs 3222.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 3222.T has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 3222.T trades at ¥942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 3222.T's P/E ratio is 70.09. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3222.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 3222.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 3222.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8278.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8278.T has a market cap of 175.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8278.T trades at ¥2,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8278.T's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8278.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8278.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8278.T's competition here
8276.T vs 9948.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 9948.T has a market cap of 163.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 9948.T trades at ¥3,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 9948.T's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9948.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 9948.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 9948.T's competition here
8276.T vs 9956.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 9956.T has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 9956.T trades at ¥2,670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 9956.T's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9956.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 9956.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 9956.T's competition here
8276.T vs 7512.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 7512.T has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 7512.T trades at ¥898.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 7512.T's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7512.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 7512.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 7512.T's competition here
8276.T vs 2733.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 2733.T has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 2733.T trades at ¥3,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 2733.T's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2733.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 2733.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 2733.T's competition here
8276.T vs 2653.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 2653.T has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 2653.T trades at ¥3,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 2653.T's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2653.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 2653.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 2653.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8255.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8255.T has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8255.T trades at ¥1,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8255.T's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8255.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8255.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8255.T's competition here
8276.T vs 3612.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 3612.T has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 3612.T trades at ¥2,783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 3612.T's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3612.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is less volatile compared to 3612.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 3612.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8244.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8244.T has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8244.T trades at ¥1,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8244.T's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8244.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8244.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8244.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8173.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8173.T has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8173.T trades at ¥2,462.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8173.T's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8173.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8173.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8173.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8237.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8237.T has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8237.T trades at ¥1,127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8237.T's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8237.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is less volatile compared to 8237.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8237.T's competition here
8276.T vs 2698.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 2698.T has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 2698.T trades at ¥3,695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 2698.T's P/E ratio is 481.12. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2698.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 2698.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 2698.T's competition here
8276.T vs 9946.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 9946.T has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 9946.T trades at ¥2,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 9946.T's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9946.T's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 9946.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 9946.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8217.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8217.T has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8217.T trades at ¥930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8217.T's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8217.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8217.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8217.T's competition here
8276.T vs 7444.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 7444.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 7444.T trades at ¥1,909.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 7444.T's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7444.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 7444.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 7444.T's competition here
8276.T vs 7506.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 7506.T has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 7506.T trades at ¥1,369.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 7506.T's P/E ratio is 80.62. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7506.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 7506.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 7506.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8260.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8260.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8260.T trades at ¥431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8260.T's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8260.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 8260.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8260.T's competition here
8276.T vs 3169.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 3169.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 3169.T trades at ¥637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 3169.T's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3169.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 3169.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 3169.T's competition here
8276.T vs 3583.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 3583.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 3583.T trades at ¥1,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 3583.T's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3583.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 3583.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 3583.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8254.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8254.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8254.T trades at ¥471.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8254.T's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8254.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is less volatile compared to 8254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8254.T's competition here
8276.T vs 8247.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 8247.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 8247.T trades at ¥406.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 8247.T's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8247.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is less volatile compared to 8247.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 8247.T's competition here
8276.T vs 7601.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 7601.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 7601.T trades at ¥183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 7601.T's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7601.T's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 7601.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 7601.T's competition here
8276.T vs 4558.T Comparison August 2025
8276.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8276.T stands at 145.5B. In comparison, 4558.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8276.T is priced at ¥2,914.00, while 4558.T trades at ¥202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8276.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas 4558.T's P/E ratio is 47.64. In terms of profitability, 8276.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4558.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8276.T is more volatile compared to 4558.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8276.T.Check 4558.T's competition here