Onward Holdings Co., Ltd.
Onward Holdings Co., Ltd. (8016.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (8016.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8016.T | ¥737.00 | +1.24% | 100.2B | 10.85 | ¥67.92 | +3.63% |
| 3402.T | ¥1,130.50 | +0.22% | 1.7T | 29.39 | ¥38.46 | +1.59% |
| 3110.T | ¥20,480.00 | +4.44% | 745.6B | 52.20 | ¥392.36 | +0.47% |
| 3591.T | ¥4,124.00 | +0.63% | 203.7B | 19.31 | ¥213.55 | +2.18% |
| 3569.T | ¥3,120.00 | -0.79% | 183B | 12.22 | ¥255.42 | +2.19% |
| 2685.T | ¥3,060.00 | +1.16% | 141.2B | 16.37 | ¥186.95 | +2.64% |
| 3201.T | ¥1,868.00 | +0.16% | 125.2B | 14.13 | ¥132.21 | +2.52% |
| 3104.T | ¥3,645.00 | -0.95% | 123.1B | 23.64 | ¥154.19 | +4.39% |
| 3002.T | ¥3,815.00 | +0.79% | 122.1B | 47.29 | ¥80.67 | +5.61% |
| 3608.T | ¥1,098.00 | +0.92% | 63.9B | 4.57 | ¥240.24 | +2.90% |
Stock Comparison
8016.T vs 3402.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3402.T has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3402.T trades at ¥1,130.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3402.T's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3402.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3402.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3402.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3110.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3110.T has a market cap of 745.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3110.T trades at ¥20,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3110.T's P/E ratio is 52.20. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3110.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3110.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3110.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3591.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3591.T has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3591.T trades at ¥4,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3591.T's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3591.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3591.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3591.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3569.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3569.T has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3569.T trades at ¥3,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3569.T's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3569.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3569.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3569.T's competition here
8016.T vs 2685.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 2685.T has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 2685.T trades at ¥3,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 2685.T's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2685.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 2685.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 2685.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3201.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3201.T has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3201.T trades at ¥1,868.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3201.T's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3201.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3201.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3201.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3104.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3104.T has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3104.T trades at ¥3,645.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3104.T's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3104.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3104.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3104.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3002.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3002.T has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3002.T trades at ¥3,815.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3002.T's P/E ratio is 47.29. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3002.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3002.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3002.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3608.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3608.T has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3608.T trades at ¥1,098.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3608.T's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3608.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3608.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3608.T's competition here
8016.T vs 7447.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 7447.T has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 7447.T trades at ¥1,721.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 7447.T's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 7447.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 7447.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 7447.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8011.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8011.T has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8011.T trades at ¥4,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8011.T's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8011.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 8011.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8011.T's competition here
8016.T vs 7460.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 7460.T has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 7460.T trades at ¥4,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 7460.T's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 7460.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 7460.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 7460.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8101.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8101.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8101.T trades at ¥2,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8101.T's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8101.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 8101.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8101.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3580.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3580.T has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3580.T trades at ¥789.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3580.T's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3580.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3580.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3580.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3597.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3597.T has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3597.T trades at ¥10,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3597.T's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3597.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3597.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3597.T's competition here
8016.T vs 325A.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 325A.T has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 325A.T trades at ¥3,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 325A.T's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 325A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 325A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 325A.T's competition here
8016.T vs 7856.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 7856.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 7856.T trades at ¥1,766.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 7856.T's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 7856.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 7856.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 7856.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3611.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3611.T has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3611.T trades at ¥2,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3611.T's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3611.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3611.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3611.T's competition here
8016.T vs 9982.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 9982.T has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 9982.T trades at ¥2,438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 9982.T's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9982.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 9982.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 9982.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8029.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8029.T has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8029.T trades at ¥2,556.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8029.T's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8029.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 8029.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8029.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3205.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3205.T has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3205.T trades at ¥689.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3205.T's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3205.T's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3205.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3205.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3501.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3501.T has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3501.T trades at ¥1,398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3501.T's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3501.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3501.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3501.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8118.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8118.T has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8118.T trades at ¥1,121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8118.T's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8118.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 8118.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8118.T's competition here
8016.T vs 9275.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 9275.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 9275.T trades at ¥1,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 9275.T's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9275.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 9275.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 9275.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3529.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3529.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3529.T trades at ¥957.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3529.T's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3529.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3529.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3529.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3109.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3109.T has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3109.T trades at ¥1,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3109.T's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3109.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3109.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3109.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8127.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8127.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8127.T trades at ¥603.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8127.T's P/E ratio is 86.89. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8127.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 8127.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8127.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3320.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3320.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3320.T trades at ¥1,351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3320.T's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3320.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3320.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3320.T's competition here
8016.T vs 9980.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 9980.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 9980.T trades at ¥103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 9980.T's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9980.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 9980.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 9980.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8107.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8107.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8107.T trades at ¥32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8107.T's P/E ratio is -168.42. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8107.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 8107.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8107.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3571.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3571.T has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3571.T trades at ¥693.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3571.T's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3571.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3571.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3571.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3123.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3123.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3123.T trades at ¥623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3123.T's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3123.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3123.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3123.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8115.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8115.T has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8115.T trades at ¥1,429.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8115.T's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8115.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 8115.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8115.T's competition here
8016.T vs 2776.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 2776.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 2776.T trades at ¥127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 2776.T's P/E ratio is -52.05. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2776.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 2776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 2776.T's competition here
8016.T vs 9885.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 9885.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 9885.T trades at ¥348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 9885.T's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9885.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 9885.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 9885.T's competition here
8016.T vs 7126.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 7126.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 7126.T trades at ¥1,526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 7126.T's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 7126.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 7126.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 7126.T's competition here
8016.T vs 7112.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 7112.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 7112.T trades at ¥780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 7112.T's P/E ratio is 137.08. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 7112.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 7112.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 7112.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3524.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3524.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3524.T trades at ¥1,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3524.T's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3524.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3524.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3524.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3202.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3202.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3202.T trades at ¥127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3202.T's P/E ratio is 78.88. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3202.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3202.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3202.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8040.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8040.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8040.T trades at ¥1,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8040.T's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8040.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 8040.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8040.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3409.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3409.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3409.T trades at ¥112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3409.T's P/E ratio is -57.73. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3409.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3409.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3409.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3045.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3045.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3045.T trades at ¥1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3045.T's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3045.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3045.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3045.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3577.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3577.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3577.T trades at ¥967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3577.T's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3577.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3577.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3577.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3550.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3550.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3550.T trades at ¥218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3550.T's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3550.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3550.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3550.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8123.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8123.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8123.T trades at ¥1,384.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8123.T's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8123.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 8123.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8123.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3598.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3598.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3598.T trades at ¥168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3598.T's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3598.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3598.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3598.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3600.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3600.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3600.T trades at ¥1,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3600.T's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3600.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 3600.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3600.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8166.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8166.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8166.T trades at ¥78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8166.T's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8166.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is more volatile compared to 8166.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8166.T's competition here
8016.T vs 3111.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 3111.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 3111.T trades at ¥231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 3111.T's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3111.T's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 3111.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 3111.T's competition here
8016.T vs 8143.T Comparison April 2026
8016.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8016.T stands at 100.2B. In comparison, 8143.T has a market cap of 458.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8016.T is priced at ¥737.00, while 8143.T trades at ¥194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8016.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas 8143.T's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, 8016.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8143.T's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 8016.T is less volatile compared to 8143.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8016.T.Check 8143.T's competition here