BALMUDA Inc.
BALMUDA Inc. (6612.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (6612.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6612.T | ¥618.00 | +0.32% | 5.3B | -3.29 | -¥187.84 | N/A |
| 5947.T | ¥3,735.00 | +2.08% | 515.7B | 15.73 | ¥237.47 | +2.46% |
| 6755.T | ¥2,798.00 | +0.00% | 293B | -75.19 | -¥37.21 | +0.68% |
| 4665.T | ¥4,235.00 | +0.64% | 199.1B | 20.84 | ¥203.25 | +2.42% |
| 8130.T | ¥3,105.00 | +0.49% | 182.5B | 14.51 | ¥213.98 | +4.51% |
| 7981.T | ¥2,826.00 | +3.14% | 178.7B | 13.38 | ¥211.14 | +3.28% |
| 7972.T | ¥3,245.00 | +7.27% | 160.3B | 17.05 | ¥190.31 | +1.98% |
| 7965.T | ¥1,708.00 | +2.52% | 108.4B | 18.50 | ¥92.30 | +4.32% |
| 5946.T | ¥2,003.00 | +0.35% | 68.1B | 31.34 | ¥63.92 | +2.07% |
| 7989.T | ¥2,548.00 | +1.31% | 51.2B | 15.81 | ¥161.21 | +2.26% |
Stock Comparison
6612.T vs 5947.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 5947.T has a market cap of 515.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 5947.T trades at ¥3,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 5947.T's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 5947.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 5947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 5947.T's competition here
6612.T vs 6755.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 6755.T has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 6755.T trades at ¥2,798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 6755.T's P/E ratio is -75.19. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 6755.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 6755.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 6755.T's competition here
6612.T vs 4665.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 4665.T has a market cap of 199.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 4665.T trades at ¥4,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 4665.T's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 4665.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 4665.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 4665.T's competition here
6612.T vs 8130.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 8130.T has a market cap of 182.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 8130.T trades at ¥3,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 8130.T's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 8130.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T and 8130.T have similar daily volatility (1.13).Check 8130.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7981.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7981.T has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7981.T trades at ¥2,826.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7981.T's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7981.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7981.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7972.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7972.T has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7972.T trades at ¥3,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7972.T's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7972.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7972.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7972.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7965.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7965.T has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7965.T trades at ¥1,708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7965.T's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7965.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7965.T's competition here
6612.T vs 5946.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 5946.T has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 5946.T trades at ¥2,003.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 5946.T's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 5946.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 5946.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 5946.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7989.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7989.T has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7989.T trades at ¥2,548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7989.T's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7989.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7989.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7989.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7840.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7840.T has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7840.T trades at ¥1,327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7840.T's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7840.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7840.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7840.T's competition here
6612.T vs 6932.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 6932.T has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 6932.T trades at ¥2,591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 6932.T's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 6932.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 6932.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 6932.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7874.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7874.T has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7874.T trades at ¥1,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7874.T's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7874.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7874.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7874.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7955.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7955.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7955.T trades at ¥943.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7955.T's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7955.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7955.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7955.T's competition here
6612.T vs 6924.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 6924.T has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 6924.T trades at ¥4,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 6924.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 6924.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 6924.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 6924.T's competition here
6612.T vs 5909.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 5909.T has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 5909.T trades at ¥960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 5909.T's P/E ratio is 39.83. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 5909.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 5909.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 5909.T's competition here
6612.T vs 3421.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 3421.T has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 3421.T trades at ¥1,736.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 3421.T's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 3421.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 3421.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 3421.T's competition here
6612.T vs 6445.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 6445.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 6445.T trades at ¥1,321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 6445.T's P/E ratio is 40.48. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 6445.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 6445.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 6445.T's competition here
6612.T vs 6484.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 6484.T has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 6484.T trades at ¥2,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 6484.T's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 6484.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 6484.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 6484.T's competition here
6612.T vs 5965.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 5965.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 5965.T trades at ¥1,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 5965.T's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 5965.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 5965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 5965.T's competition here
6612.T vs 5951.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 5951.T has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 5951.T trades at ¥1,027.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 5951.T's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 5951.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 5951.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 5951.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7885.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7885.T has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7885.T trades at ¥1,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7885.T's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7885.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7885.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7885.T's competition here
6612.T vs 5941.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 5941.T has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 5941.T trades at ¥2,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 5941.T's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 5941.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 5941.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 5941.T's competition here
6612.T vs 3140.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 3140.T has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 3140.T trades at ¥1,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 3140.T's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 3140.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 3140.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 3140.T's competition here
6612.T vs 6291.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 6291.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 6291.T trades at ¥1,243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 6291.T's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 6291.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 6291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 6291.T's competition here
6612.T vs 4235.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 4235.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 4235.T trades at ¥685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 4235.T's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 4235.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 4235.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 4235.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7822.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7822.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7822.T trades at ¥230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7822.T's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7822.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7822.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7822.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7887.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7887.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7887.T trades at ¥2,022.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7887.T's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7887.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7887.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7898.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7898.T has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7898.T trades at ¥989.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7898.T's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7898.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 7898.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7898.T's competition here
6612.T vs 9827.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 9827.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 9827.T trades at ¥647.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 9827.T's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 9827.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is less volatile compared to 9827.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 9827.T's competition here
6612.T vs 8119.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 8119.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 8119.T trades at ¥808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 8119.T's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 8119.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 8119.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 8119.T's competition here
6612.T vs 5956.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 5956.T has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 5956.T trades at ¥609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 5956.T's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 5956.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 5956.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 5956.T's competition here
6612.T vs 6897.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 6897.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 6897.T trades at ¥402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 6897.T's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 6897.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 6897.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 6897.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7807.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7807.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7807.T trades at ¥836.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7807.T's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7807.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 7807.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7807.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7791.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7791.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7791.T trades at ¥811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7791.T's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7791.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 7791.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7791.T's competition here
6612.T vs 7997.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 7997.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 7997.T trades at ¥967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 7997.T's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 7997.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 7997.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 7997.T's competition here
6612.T vs 3450.T Comparison April 2026
6612.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6612.T stands at 5.3B. In comparison, 3450.T has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 6612.T is priced at ¥618.00, while 3450.T trades at ¥1,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6612.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas 3450.T's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, 6612.T's ROE is -0.44%, compared to 3450.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6612.T is more volatile compared to 3450.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6612.T.Check 3450.T's competition here