JSS Corporation
JSS Corporation (6074.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (6074.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6074.T | ¥515.00 | +1.38% | 2.1B | 10.35 | ¥49.74 | +3.49% |
| 4661.T | ¥2,735.00 | +1.30% | 4.5T | 35.43 | ¥77.28 | +0.46% |
| 7832.T | ¥3,932.00 | +1.68% | 2.6T | 20.22 | ¥196.40 | +1.58% |
| 7309.T | ¥16,820.00 | +2.37% | 1.4T | 43.21 | ¥387.75 | +1.82% |
| 7731.T | ¥1,972.00 | +4.45% | 646.8B | 77.18 | ¥25.46 | +1.88% |
| 7951.T | ¥1,140.50 | +3.40% | 509B | 29.64 | ¥38.38 | +2.05% |
| 8114.T | ¥4,335.00 | -0.23% | 327.6B | 0.00 | ¥2,097,244,930.00 | +1.11% |
| 8111.T | ¥2,222.00 | +0.45% | 310.4B | 13.08 | ¥173.25 | +2.30% |
| 7906.T | ¥3,015.00 | +2.03% | 261.4B | 22.67 | ¥134.75 | +0.71% |
| 7867.T | ¥2,711.00 | +4.19% | 243.4B | 15.27 | ¥179.28 | +2.10% |
Stock Comparison
6074.T vs 4661.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 4661.T has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 4661.T trades at ¥2,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 4661.T's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4661.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 4661.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 4661.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7832.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7832.T has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7832.T trades at ¥3,932.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7832.T's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7832.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7832.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7832.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7309.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7309.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7309.T trades at ¥16,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7309.T's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7309.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7309.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7309.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7731.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7731.T has a market cap of 646.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7731.T trades at ¥1,972.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7731.T's P/E ratio is 77.18. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7731.T's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7731.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7731.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7951.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7951.T has a market cap of 509B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7951.T trades at ¥1,140.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7951.T's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7951.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7951.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7951.T's competition here
6074.T vs 8114.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 8114.T has a market cap of 327.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 8114.T trades at ¥4,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 8114.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8114.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 8114.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 8114.T's competition here
6074.T vs 8111.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 8111.T has a market cap of 310.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 8111.T trades at ¥2,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 8111.T's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8111.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 8111.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 8111.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7906.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7906.T has a market cap of 261.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7906.T trades at ¥3,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7906.T's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7906.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7906.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7906.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7867.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7867.T has a market cap of 243.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7867.T trades at ¥2,711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7867.T's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7867.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7867.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7867.T's competition here
6074.T vs 4680.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 4680.T has a market cap of 221.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 4680.T trades at ¥849.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 4680.T's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4680.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 4680.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 4680.T's competition here
6074.T vs 6412.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 6412.T has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 6412.T trades at ¥1,910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 6412.T's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6412.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 6412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 6412.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7458.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7458.T has a market cap of 177.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7458.T trades at ¥1,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7458.T's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7458.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7458.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7458.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7740.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7740.T has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7740.T trades at ¥1,022.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7740.T's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7740.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7740.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7740.T's competition here
6074.T vs 9166.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 9166.T has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 9166.T trades at ¥611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 9166.T's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9166.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 9166.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 9166.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7944.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7944.T has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7944.T trades at ¥3,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7944.T's P/E ratio is 48.27. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7944.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7944.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7944.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7839.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7839.T has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7839.T trades at ¥1,706.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7839.T's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7839.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7839.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7839.T's competition here
6074.T vs 9603.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 9603.T has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 9603.T trades at ¥1,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 9603.T's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9603.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 9603.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 9603.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7085.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7085.T has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7085.T trades at ¥766.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7085.T's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7085.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7085.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7085.T's competition here
6074.T vs 6425.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 6425.T has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 6425.T trades at ¥696.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 6425.T's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6425.T's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 6425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 6425.T's competition here
6074.T vs 4343.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 4343.T has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 4343.T trades at ¥2,427.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 4343.T's P/E ratio is -110.33. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4343.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 4343.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 4343.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7816.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7816.T has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7816.T trades at ¥1,247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7816.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7816.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is more volatile compared to 7816.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7816.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7990.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7990.T has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7990.T trades at ¥2,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7990.T's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7990.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7990.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7990.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7092.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7092.T has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7092.T trades at ¥2,302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7092.T's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7092.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is more volatile compared to 7092.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7092.T's competition here
6074.T vs 6238.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 6238.T has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 6238.T trades at ¥1,311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 6238.T's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6238.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 6238.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 6238.T's competition here
6074.T vs 8920.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 8920.T has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 8920.T trades at ¥885.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 8920.T's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8920.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 8920.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 8920.T's competition here
6074.T vs 4801.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 4801.T has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 4801.T trades at ¥2,388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 4801.T's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4801.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 4801.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 4801.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7952.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7952.T has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7952.T trades at ¥3,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7952.T's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7952.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7952.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7952.T's competition here
6074.T vs 2340.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 2340.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 2340.T trades at ¥486.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 2340.T's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2340.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 2340.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 2340.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7608.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7608.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7608.T trades at ¥770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7608.T's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7608.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7608.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7608.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7809.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7809.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7809.T trades at ¥1,349.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7809.T's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7809.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7809.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7809.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7841.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7841.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7841.T trades at ¥1,104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7841.T's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7841.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7841.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7841.T's competition here
6074.T vs 8135.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 8135.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 8135.T trades at ¥448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 8135.T's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8135.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 8135.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 8135.T's competition here
6074.T vs 6819.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 6819.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 6819.T trades at ¥472.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 6819.T's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6819.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 6819.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 6819.T's competition here
6074.T vs 6570.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 6570.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 6570.T trades at ¥1,217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 6570.T's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6570.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 6570.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 6570.T's competition here
6074.T vs 2330.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 2330.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 2330.T trades at ¥111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 2330.T's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2330.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 2330.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 2330.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7847.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7847.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7847.T trades at ¥618.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7847.T's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7847.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7847.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7847.T's competition here
6074.T vs 3326.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 3326.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 3326.T trades at ¥696.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 3326.T's P/E ratio is 60.60. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3326.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 3326.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 3326.T's competition here
6074.T vs 7865.T Comparison April 2026
6074.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6074.T stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 7865.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6074.T is priced at ¥515.00, while 7865.T trades at ¥413.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6074.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.35, whereas 7865.T's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, 6074.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7865.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6074.T is less volatile compared to 7865.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6074.T.Check 7865.T's competition here