Fujimak Corporation
Fujimak Corporation (5965.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (5965.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5965.T | ¥981.00 | +0.41% | 12.9B | 5.67 | ¥172.93 | +4.59% |
| 5947.T | ¥3,985.00 | +1.07% | 557.2B | 19.00 | ¥209.77 | +2.01% |
| 6755.T | ¥2,797.00 | -0.04% | 292.8B | -75.17 | -¥37.21 | +1.32% |
| 4665.T | ¥3,975.00 | -0.85% | 186.7B | 21.41 | ¥185.62 | +2.77% |
| 7981.T | ¥2,734.00 | +0.26% | 181.7B | 16.77 | ¥163.07 | +2.85% |
| 8130.T | ¥3,070.00 | -1.44% | 180.4B | 14.35 | ¥214.00 | +4.89% |
| 7972.T | ¥2,471.00 | -1.28% | 122.1B | 15.33 | ¥161.19 | +2.23% |
| 7965.T | ¥1,841.00 | -0.43% | 120.8B | 23.88 | ¥77.10 | +2.34% |
| 5946.T | ¥1,886.00 | -4.07% | 64.1B | 20.85 | ¥90.44 | +2.44% |
| 7840.T | ¥1,295.00 | -0.23% | 43.2B | 16.85 | ¥76.84 | +3.01% |
Stock Comparison
5965.T vs 5947.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 5947.T has a market cap of 557.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 5947.T trades at ¥3,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 5947.T's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5947.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 5947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 5947.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6755.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6755.T has a market cap of 292.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6755.T trades at ¥2,797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6755.T's P/E ratio is -75.17. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6755.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 6755.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6755.T's competition here
5965.T vs 4665.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 4665.T has a market cap of 186.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 4665.T trades at ¥3,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 4665.T's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4665.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 4665.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 4665.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7981.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7981.T has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7981.T trades at ¥2,734.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7981.T's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7981.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7981.T's competition here
5965.T vs 8130.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 8130.T has a market cap of 180.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 8130.T trades at ¥3,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 8130.T's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8130.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 8130.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 8130.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7972.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7972.T has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7972.T trades at ¥2,471.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7972.T's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7972.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7972.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7972.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7965.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7965.T has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7965.T trades at ¥1,841.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7965.T's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7965.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7965.T's competition here
5965.T vs 5946.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 5946.T has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 5946.T trades at ¥1,886.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 5946.T's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5946.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 5946.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 5946.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7840.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7840.T has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7840.T trades at ¥1,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7840.T's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7840.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 7840.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7840.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7874.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7874.T has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7874.T trades at ¥1,247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7874.T's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7874.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7874.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7874.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7989.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7989.T has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7989.T trades at ¥1,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7989.T's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7989.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7989.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7989.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6932.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6932.T has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6932.T trades at ¥2,277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6932.T's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6932.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 6932.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6932.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6924.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6924.T has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6924.T trades at ¥4,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6924.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6924.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 6924.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6924.T's competition here
5965.T vs 3421.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 3421.T has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 3421.T trades at ¥1,828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 3421.T's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3421.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 3421.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 3421.T's competition here
5965.T vs 5909.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 5909.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 5909.T trades at ¥942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 5909.T's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5909.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 5909.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 5909.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7955.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7955.T has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7955.T trades at ¥756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7955.T's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7955.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7955.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7955.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6445.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6445.T has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6445.T trades at ¥1,143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6445.T's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6445.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 6445.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6445.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6484.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6484.T has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6484.T trades at ¥2,073.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6484.T's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6484.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 6484.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6484.T's competition here
5965.T vs 5941.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 5941.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 5941.T trades at ¥2,436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 5941.T's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5941.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 5941.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 5941.T's competition here
5965.T vs 3140.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 3140.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 3140.T trades at ¥994.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 3140.T's P/E ratio is -80.81. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3140.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 3140.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 3140.T's competition here
5965.T vs 5951.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 5951.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 5951.T trades at ¥775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 5951.T's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5951.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 5951.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 5951.T's competition here
5965.T vs 4235.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 4235.T has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 4235.T trades at ¥739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 4235.T's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4235.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 4235.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 4235.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7885.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7885.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7885.T trades at ¥753.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7885.T's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7885.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7885.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7885.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6291.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6291.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6291.T trades at ¥1,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6291.T's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6291.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 6291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6291.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7822.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7822.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7822.T trades at ¥235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7822.T's P/E ratio is -361.54. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7822.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7822.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7822.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7898.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7898.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7898.T trades at ¥878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7898.T's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7898.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7898.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7898.T's competition here
5965.T vs 8119.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 8119.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 8119.T trades at ¥816.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 8119.T's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8119.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 8119.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 8119.T's competition here
5965.T vs 9827.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 9827.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 9827.T trades at ¥626.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 9827.T's P/E ratio is 125.96. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9827.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 9827.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 9827.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6612.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6612.T has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6612.T trades at ¥848.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6612.T's P/E ratio is -97.81. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6612.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 6612.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6612.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7887.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7887.T has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7887.T trades at ¥6,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7887.T's P/E ratio is 66.72. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7887.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7887.T's competition here
5965.T vs 5956.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 5956.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 5956.T trades at ¥545.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 5956.T's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5956.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 5956.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 5956.T's competition here
5965.T vs 6897.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 6897.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 6897.T trades at ¥415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 6897.T's P/E ratio is -43.36. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6897.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 6897.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 6897.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7791.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7791.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7791.T trades at ¥909.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7791.T's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7791.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7791.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7791.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7807.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7807.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7807.T trades at ¥798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7807.T's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7807.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7807.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7807.T's competition here
5965.T vs 7997.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 7997.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 7997.T trades at ¥814.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 7997.T's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7997.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is less volatile compared to 7997.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 7997.T's competition here
5965.T vs 3450.T Comparison August 2025
5965.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5965.T stands at 12.9B. In comparison, 3450.T has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 5965.T is priced at ¥981.00, while 3450.T trades at ¥1,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5965.T currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 3450.T's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, 5965.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3450.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5965.T is more volatile compared to 3450.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5965.T.Check 3450.T's competition here