Fuller Smith & Turner PLC
Fuller Smith & Turner PLC (54GW.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (54GW.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54GW.L | £107.50 | +0.00% | 64.5M | N/A | N/A | +3.72% |
| 0HXW.L | £42.48 | +0.00% | 58.8B | 1.82 | £24.05 | N/A |
| CPG.L | £2,578.00 | +0.00% | 44B | 41.13 | £0.63 | +2.15% |
| 0QKI.L | £516.00 | -0.80% | 26.7B | 16.29 | £31.68 | +3.81% |
| 0I77.L | £205.19 | +0.00% | 24.3B | 26.05 | £7.95 | +2.75% |
| 0VFA.L | £89.99 | -1.45% | 22.8B | 25.77 | £3.49 | +3.67% |
| 0M30.L | £44.67 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 22.54 | £1.98 | +1.79% |
| MAB.L | £265.50 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 9.48 | £0.28 | N/A |
| SSPG.L | £164.30 | +0.00% | 1.3B | -54.63 | -£0.03 | +2.26% |
| JDW.L | £730.00 | +0.00% | 782.3M | 14.39 | £0.51 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
54GW.L vs 0HXW.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 0HXW.L has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 0HXW.L trades at £42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HXW.L's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HXW.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to 0HXW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check 0HXW.L's competition here
54GW.L vs CPG.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, CPG.L has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while CPG.L trades at £2,578.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPG.L's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPG.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to CPG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check CPG.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 0QKI.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 0QKI.L has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 0QKI.L trades at £516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QKI.L's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QKI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to 0QKI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check 0QKI.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 0I77.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 0I77.L has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 0I77.L trades at £205.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0I77.L's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0I77.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to 0I77.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check 0I77.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 0VFA.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 0VFA.L has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 0VFA.L trades at £89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VFA.L's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VFA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to 0VFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check 0VFA.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 0M30.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 0M30.L has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 0M30.L trades at £44.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0M30.L's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0M30.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to 0M30.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check 0M30.L's competition here
54GW.L vs MAB.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, MAB.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while MAB.L trades at £265.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAB.L's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to MAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check MAB.L's competition here
54GW.L vs SSPG.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, SSPG.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while SSPG.L trades at £164.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSPG.L's P/E ratio is -54.63. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSPG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to SSPG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check SSPG.L's competition here
54GW.L vs JDW.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, JDW.L has a market cap of 782.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while JDW.L trades at £730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDW.L's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JDW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to JDW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check JDW.L's competition here
54GW.L vs DOM.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, DOM.L has a market cap of 779M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while DOM.L trades at £201.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOM.L's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOM.L's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to DOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check DOM.L's competition here
54GW.L vs RTN.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, RTN.L has a market cap of 499.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while RTN.L trades at £64.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTN.L's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTN.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 54GW.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and RTN.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check RTN.L's competition here
54GW.L vs YNGN.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, YNGN.L has a market cap of 465.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while YNGN.L trades at £584.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNGN.L's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNGN.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to YNGN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check YNGN.L's competition here
54GW.L vs YNGA.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, YNGA.L has a market cap of 456.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while YNGA.L trades at £864.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNGA.L's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNGA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to YNGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check YNGA.L's competition here
54GW.L vs LGRS.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, LGRS.L has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while LGRS.L trades at £324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGRS.L's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGRS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to LGRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check LGRS.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 0KT6.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 0KT6.L has a market cap of 333.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 0KT6.L trades at £37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KT6.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0KT6.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to 0KT6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check 0KT6.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 53GW.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 53GW.L has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 53GW.L trades at £0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 53GW.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 53GW.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and 53GW.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 53GW.L's competition here
54GW.L vs FSTA.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, FSTA.L has a market cap of 301.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while FSTA.L trades at £548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTA.L's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSTA.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to FSTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check FSTA.L's competition here
54GW.L vs DPEU.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, DPEU.L has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while DPEU.L trades at £190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPEU.L's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPEU.L's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and DPEU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPEU.L's competition here
54GW.L vs MARS.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, MARS.L has a market cap of 248.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while MARS.L trades at £39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARS.L's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MARS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to MARS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check MARS.L's competition here
54GW.L vs CPC.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, CPC.L has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while CPC.L trades at £139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPC.L's P/E ratio is 139.00. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and CPC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPC.L's competition here
54GW.L vs DPP.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, DPP.L has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while DPP.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPP.L's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to DPP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check DPP.L's competition here
54GW.L vs FUL.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, FUL.L has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while FUL.L trades at £14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and FUL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUL.L's competition here
54GW.L vs VARE.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, VARE.L has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while VARE.L trades at £11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VARE.L's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VARE.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and VARE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VARE.L's competition here
54GW.L vs MEX.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, MEX.L has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while MEX.L trades at £46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEX.L's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEX.L's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to MEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check MEX.L's competition here
54GW.L vs RBG.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, RBG.L has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while RBG.L trades at £0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBG.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBG.L's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to RBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check RBG.L's competition here
54GW.L vs HVT.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, HVT.L has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while HVT.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT.L's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HVT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and HVT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HVT.L's competition here
54GW.L vs HVTA.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, HVTA.L has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while HVTA.L trades at £155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVTA.L's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HVTA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and HVTA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HVTA.L's competition here
54GW.L vs NGHT.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, NGHT.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while NGHT.L trades at £2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGHT.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGHT.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to NGHT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check NGHT.L's competition here
54GW.L vs COM.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, COM.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while COM.L trades at £4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COM.L's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COM.L's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to COM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check COM.L's competition here
54GW.L vs PIER.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, PIER.L has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while PIER.L trades at £11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIER.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIER.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and PIER.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIER.L's competition here
54GW.L vs TAST.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, TAST.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while TAST.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAST.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TAST.L's ROE of -11.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L is less volatile compared to TAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 54GW.L.Check TAST.L's competition here
54GW.L vs DVT.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, DVT.L has a market cap of 567.4K. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while DVT.L trades at £4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVT.L's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVT.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and DVT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVT.L's competition here
54GW.L vs MORE.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, MORE.L has a market cap of 195.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while MORE.L trades at £0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORE.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MORE.L's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and MORE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MORE.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 0RR0.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 0RR0.L has a market cap of 122.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 0RR0.L trades at £0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RR0.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0RR0.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and 0RR0.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0RR0.L's competition here
54GW.L vs HVTB.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, HVTB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while HVTB.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVTB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HVTB.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and HVTB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HVTB.L's competition here
54GW.L vs 92IP.L Comparison August 2025
54GW.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 54GW.L stands at 64.5M. In comparison, 92IP.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 54GW.L is priced at £107.50, while 92IP.L trades at £95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
54GW.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 92IP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 54GW.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 92IP.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 54GW.L and 92IP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 92IP.L's competition here