Croda International Plc
Croda International Plc (49GP.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (49GP.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49GP.L | £87.50 | -2.51% | 122.1M | N/A | £229.50 | +3.11% |
| 0QPS.L | £3,293.00 | +0.31% | 30.3B | 37.26 | £88.37 | +2.05% |
| 0QM9.L | £730.00 | -1.68% | 17.1B | 31.03 | £23.53 | +2.19% |
| 0QJS.L | £17.81 | +0.11% | 5.9B | 17.09 | £1.04 | +2.36% |
| CRDA.L | £2,627.00 | +0.57% | 3.7B | 17.06 | £1.54 | +3.11% |
| JMAT.L | £1,736.00 | -1.81% | 2.9B | 8.23 | £2.11 | +4.44% |
| 0I74.L | £21.41 | -5.68% | 1.5B | 1.39 | £15.65 | N/A |
| ELM.L | £171.20 | -1.61% | 997M | -34.24 | -£0.05 | +1.24% |
| VCT.L | £690.00 | +0.44% | 600.1M | 20.29 | £0.34 | +8.63% |
| ESNT.L | £103.00 | -1.53% | 294.3M | 34.33 | £0.03 | +2.41% |
Stock Comparison
49GP.L vs 0QPS.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, 0QPS.L has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while 0QPS.L trades at £3,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QPS.L's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QPS.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to 0QPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check 0QPS.L's competition here
49GP.L vs 0QM9.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, 0QM9.L has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while 0QM9.L trades at £730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QM9.L's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QM9.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to 0QM9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check 0QM9.L's competition here
49GP.L vs 0QJS.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, 0QJS.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while 0QJS.L trades at £17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QJS.L's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QJS.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is more volatile compared to 0QJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check 0QJS.L's competition here
49GP.L vs CRDA.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, CRDA.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while CRDA.L trades at £2,627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRDA.L's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRDA.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to CRDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check CRDA.L's competition here
49GP.L vs JMAT.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, JMAT.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while JMAT.L trades at £1,736.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMAT.L's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMAT.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to JMAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check JMAT.L's competition here
49GP.L vs 0I74.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, 0I74.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while 0I74.L trades at £21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0I74.L's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0I74.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to 0I74.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check 0I74.L's competition here
49GP.L vs ELM.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, ELM.L has a market cap of 997M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while ELM.L trades at £171.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELM.L's P/E ratio is -34.24. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELM.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to ELM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check ELM.L's competition here
49GP.L vs VCT.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, VCT.L has a market cap of 600.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while VCT.L trades at £690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCT.L's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VCT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to VCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check VCT.L's competition here
49GP.L vs ESNT.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, ESNT.L has a market cap of 294.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while ESNT.L trades at £103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESNT.L's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESNT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to ESNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check ESNT.L's competition here
49GP.L vs 0HB7.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, 0HB7.L has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while 0HB7.L trades at £2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HB7.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0HB7.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 49GP.L has daily volatility of 0.57 and 0HB7.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0HB7.L's competition here
49GP.L vs ZTF.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, ZTF.L has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while ZTF.L trades at £271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTF.L's P/E ratio is -45.17. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZTF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to ZTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check ZTF.L's competition here
49GP.L vs SYNT.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, SYNT.L has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while SYNT.L trades at £80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNT.L's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYNT.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to SYNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check SYNT.L's competition here
49GP.L vs TET.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, TET.L has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while TET.L trades at £203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TET.L's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TET.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to TET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check TET.L's competition here
49GP.L vs 50GP.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, 50GP.L has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while 50GP.L trades at £83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 50GP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 50GP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is more volatile compared to 50GP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check 50GP.L's competition here
49GP.L vs IOF.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, IOF.L has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while IOF.L trades at £25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOF.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IOF.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to IOF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check IOF.L's competition here
49GP.L vs HAYD.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, HAYD.L has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while HAYD.L trades at £0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAYD.L's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAYD.L's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to HAYD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check HAYD.L's competition here
49GP.L vs ITX.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, ITX.L has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while ITX.L trades at £134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITX.L's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITX.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to ITX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check ITX.L's competition here
49GP.L vs DCTA.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, DCTA.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while DCTA.L trades at £9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCTA.L's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCTA.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to DCTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check DCTA.L's competition here
49GP.L vs GEX.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, GEX.L has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while GEX.L trades at £6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEX.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEX.L's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to GEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check GEX.L's competition here
49GP.L vs HDD.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, HDD.L has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while HDD.L trades at £7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDD.L's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDD.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is more volatile compared to HDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check HDD.L's competition here
49GP.L vs AGM.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, AGM.L has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while AGM.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is more volatile compared to AGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check AGM.L's competition here
49GP.L vs VRS.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, VRS.L has a market cap of 832.6K. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while VRS.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VRS.L's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to VRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check VRS.L's competition here
49GP.L vs ESKN.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, ESKN.L has a market cap of 714.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while ESKN.L trades at £0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESKN.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESKN.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is more volatile compared to ESKN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check ESKN.L's competition here
49GP.L vs ZED.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, ZED.L has a market cap of 552.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while ZED.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZED.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZED.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to ZED.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check ZED.L's competition here
49GP.L vs BIOM.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, BIOM.L has a market cap of 386.7K. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while BIOM.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOM.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIOM.L's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is less volatile compared to BIOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check BIOM.L's competition here
49GP.L vs MACP.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, MACP.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while MACP.L trades at £1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MACP.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MACP.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 49GP.L has daily volatility of 0.57 and MACP.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check MACP.L's competition here
49GP.L vs 87FZ.L Comparison August 2025
49GP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 49GP.L stands at 122.1M. In comparison, 87FZ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 49GP.L is priced at £87.50, while 87FZ.L trades at £0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
49GP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 87FZ.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, 49GP.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 87FZ.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 49GP.L is more volatile compared to 87FZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 49GP.L.Check 87FZ.L's competition here