Waqoo Inc.
Waqoo Inc. (4937.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (4937.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4937.T | ¥1,185.00 | +6.47% | 4.2B | 97.21 | ¥12.19 | N/A |
| 4755.T | ¥928.20 | +3.90% | 2T | -9.49 | -¥97.83 | N/A |
| 8136.T | ¥7,708.00 | -2.87% | 1.8T | 45.82 | ¥168.24 | +0.65% |
| 9843.T | ¥13,350.00 | -3.26% | 1.5T | 18.26 | ¥730.92 | +1.10% |
| 3064.T | ¥2,582.00 | -0.86% | 1.3T | 43.87 | ¥58.86 | +0.96% |
| 3092.T | ¥1,427.50 | -1.04% | 1.3T | 28.03 | ¥50.92 | +2.47% |
| 4385.T | ¥2,475.50 | +3.15% | 407.3B | 15.99 | ¥154.80 | N/A |
| 7419.T | ¥3,340.00 | -0.30% | 320.5B | 10.45 | ¥319.59 | +1.28% |
| 9831.T | ¥467.00 | +0.49% | 317.7B | 12.09 | ¥38.62 | +2.80% |
| 3048.T | ¥1,633.00 | -0.06% | 279.6B | 15.12 | ¥108.01 | +2.57% |
Stock Comparison
4937.T vs 4755.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 4755.T has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 4755.T trades at ¥928.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 4755.T's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 4755.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 4755.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 4755.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8136.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8136.T has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8136.T trades at ¥7,708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8136.T's P/E ratio is 45.82. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8136.T's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8136.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8136.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9843.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9843.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9843.T trades at ¥13,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9843.T's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9843.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9843.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9843.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3064.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3064.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3064.T trades at ¥2,582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3064.T's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3064.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3064.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3064.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3092.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3092.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3092.T trades at ¥1,427.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3092.T's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3092.T's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3092.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3092.T's competition here
4937.T vs 4385.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 4385.T has a market cap of 407.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 4385.T trades at ¥2,475.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 4385.T's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 4385.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 4385.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 4385.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7419.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7419.T has a market cap of 320.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7419.T trades at ¥3,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7419.T's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7419.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7419.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7419.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9831.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9831.T has a market cap of 317.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9831.T trades at ¥467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9831.T's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9831.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9831.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9831.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3048.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3048.T has a market cap of 279.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3048.T trades at ¥1,633.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3048.T's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3048.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3048.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3048.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8282.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8282.T has a market cap of 240.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8282.T trades at ¥1,512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8282.T's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8282.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8282.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8282.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2730.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2730.T has a market cap of 215.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2730.T trades at ¥2,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2730.T's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2730.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2730.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2730.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8022.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8022.T has a market cap of 204.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8022.T trades at ¥2,664.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8022.T's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8022.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8022.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8022.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7552.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7552.T has a market cap of 148.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7552.T trades at ¥6,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7552.T's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7552.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7552.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7552.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2678.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2678.T has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2678.T trades at ¥1,571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2678.T's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2678.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2678.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2678.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7545.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7545.T has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7545.T trades at ¥2,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7545.T's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7545.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7545.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7545.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9832.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9832.T has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9832.T trades at ¥1,547.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9832.T's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9832.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9832.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9832.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9842.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9842.T has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9842.T trades at ¥1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9842.T's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9842.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9842.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9842.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7685.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7685.T has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7685.T trades at ¥3,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7685.T's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7685.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7685.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7685.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9997.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9997.T has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9997.T trades at ¥1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9997.T's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9997.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9997.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9997.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3028.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3028.T has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3028.T trades at ¥2,402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3028.T's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3028.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3028.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3028.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9422.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9422.T has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9422.T trades at ¥1,912.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9422.T's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9422.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9422.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9422.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3964.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3964.T has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3964.T trades at ¥1,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3964.T's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3964.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3964.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3964.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2681.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2681.T has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2681.T trades at ¥1,678.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2681.T's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2681.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2681.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2681.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3660.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3660.T has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3660.T trades at ¥659.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3660.T's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3660.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3660.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3660.T's competition here
4937.T vs 6058.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6058.T has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 6058.T trades at ¥1,113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 6058.T's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6058.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 6058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 6058.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3328.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3328.T has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3328.T trades at ¥3,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3328.T's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3328.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3328.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3328.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8281.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8281.T has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8281.T trades at ¥1,126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8281.T's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8281.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8281.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8281.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3093.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3093.T has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3093.T trades at ¥1,804.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3093.T's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3093.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3093.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3093.T's competition here
4937.T vs 4449.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 4449.T has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 4449.T trades at ¥1,412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 4449.T's P/E ratio is -209.81. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 4449.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 4449.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 4449.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2751.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2751.T has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2751.T trades at ¥3,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2751.T's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2751.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2751.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2751.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8005.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8005.T has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8005.T trades at ¥1,108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8005.T's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8005.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8005.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8005.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3333.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3333.T has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3333.T trades at ¥1,406.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3333.T's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3333.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3333.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3333.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3159.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3159.T has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3159.T trades at ¥336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3159.T's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3159.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3159.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3159.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9441.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9441.T has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9441.T trades at ¥2,527.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9441.T's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9441.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9441.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9441.T's competition here
4937.T vs 6061.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 6061.T has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 6061.T trades at ¥6,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 6061.T's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6061.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 6061.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 6061.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3179.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3179.T has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3179.T trades at ¥1,234.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3179.T's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3179.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3179.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3179.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9278.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9278.T has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9278.T trades at ¥1,496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9278.T's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9278.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9278.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9278.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7455.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7455.T has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7455.T trades at ¥461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7455.T's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7455.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7455.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7455.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2674.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2674.T has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2674.T trades at ¥1,815.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2674.T's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2674.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2674.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3542.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3542.T has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3542.T trades at ¥2,305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3542.T's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3542.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3542.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3542.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3134.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3134.T has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3134.T trades at ¥1,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3134.T's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3134.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3134.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3134.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2484.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2484.T has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2484.T trades at ¥179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2484.T's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2484.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2484.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2484.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3031.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3031.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3031.T trades at ¥731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3031.T's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3031.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3031.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3031.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3558.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3558.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3558.T trades at ¥1,491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3558.T's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3558.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3558.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3558.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8202.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8202.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8202.T trades at ¥159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8202.T's P/E ratio is -21.69. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8202.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8202.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8202.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9272.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9272.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9272.T trades at ¥1,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9272.T's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9272.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9272.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9272.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3556.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3556.T has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3556.T trades at ¥895.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3556.T's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3556.T's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3556.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3556.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7110.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7110.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7110.T trades at ¥1,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7110.T's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7110.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7110.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7110.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9270.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9270.T has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9270.T trades at ¥971.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9270.T's P/E ratio is -23.88. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9270.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9270.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9270.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8165.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8165.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8165.T trades at ¥247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8165.T's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8165.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8165.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8165.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7636.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7636.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7636.T trades at ¥825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7636.T's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7636.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7636.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7514.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7514.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7514.T trades at ¥894.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7514.T's P/E ratio is 72.68. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7514.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7514.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7514.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2652.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2652.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2652.T trades at ¥329.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2652.T's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2652.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2652.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2652.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3135.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3135.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3135.T trades at ¥1,827.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3135.T's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3135.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3135.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3135.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8289.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8289.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8289.T trades at ¥412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8289.T's P/E ratio is -140.61. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8289.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8289.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8289.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7610.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7610.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7610.T trades at ¥148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7610.T's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7610.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7610.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7610.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7442.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7442.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7442.T trades at ¥419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7442.T's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7442.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7442.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7442.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3560.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3560.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3560.T trades at ¥3,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3560.T's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3560.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3560.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3560.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2769.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2769.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2769.T trades at ¥1,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2769.T's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2769.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2769.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2769.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3319.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3319.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3319.T trades at ¥428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3319.T's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3319.T's ROE of +10.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3319.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3319.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9927.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9927.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9927.T trades at ¥766.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9927.T's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9927.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9927.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9927.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3726.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3726.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3726.T trades at ¥623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3726.T's P/E ratio is -22.37. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3726.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3726.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3726.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3396.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3396.T has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3396.T trades at ¥865.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3396.T's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3396.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3396.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3396.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8230.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8230.T has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8230.T trades at ¥321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8230.T's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8230.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8230.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8230.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3187.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3187.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3187.T trades at ¥317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3187.T's P/E ratio is 79.85. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3187.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3187.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3187.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7695.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7695.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7695.T trades at ¥2,332.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7695.T's P/E ratio is 59.70. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7695.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7695.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7695.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3058.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3058.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3058.T trades at ¥689.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3058.T's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3058.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3058.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3172.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3172.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3172.T trades at ¥1,114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3172.T's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3172.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3172.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3172.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3779.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3779.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3779.T trades at ¥409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3779.T's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3779.T's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3779.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3779.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3190.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3190.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3190.T trades at ¥604.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3190.T's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3190.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3190.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3190.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3059.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3059.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3059.T trades at ¥833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3059.T's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3059.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3059.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3059.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9444.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9444.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9444.T trades at ¥624.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9444.T's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9444.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9444.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9444.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3195.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3195.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3195.T trades at ¥474.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3195.T's P/E ratio is -162.33. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3195.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3195.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3195.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9425.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9425.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9425.T trades at ¥669.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9425.T's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9425.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9425.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9425.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9854.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9854.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9854.T trades at ¥187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9854.T's P/E ratio is 1100.00. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9854.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9854.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9854.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3181.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3181.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3181.T trades at ¥952.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3181.T's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3181.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3181.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3181.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9557.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9557.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9557.T trades at ¥419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9557.T's P/E ratio is 90.69. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9557.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 9557.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9557.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3071.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3071.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3071.T trades at ¥118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3071.T's P/E ratio is 786.67. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3071.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3071.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3071.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3177.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3177.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3177.T trades at ¥3,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3177.T's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3177.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3177.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3177.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3138.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3138.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3138.T trades at ¥938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3138.T's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3138.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3138.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3138.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3185.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3185.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3185.T trades at ¥166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3185.T's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3185.T's ROE of -7.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3185.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3185.T's competition here
4937.T vs 9978.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9978.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 9978.T trades at ¥65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 9978.T's P/E ratio is 122.64. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9978.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is less volatile compared to 9978.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 9978.T's competition here
4937.T vs 8225.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8225.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 8225.T trades at ¥3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 8225.T's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8225.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 8225.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 8225.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7501.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7501.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7501.T trades at ¥1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7501.T's P/E ratio is -16.23. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7501.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7501.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7501.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7640.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7640.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7640.T trades at ¥161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7640.T's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7640.T's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7640.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2666.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2666.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2666.T trades at ¥160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2666.T's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2666.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2666.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2666.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2673.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2673.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2673.T trades at ¥215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2673.T's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2673.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is less volatile compared to 2673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2673.T's competition here
4937.T vs 4017.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 4017.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 4017.T trades at ¥315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 4017.T's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 4017.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is less volatile compared to 4017.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 4017.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7477.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7477.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7477.T trades at ¥1,378.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7477.T's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7477.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7477.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7477.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3192.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3192.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3192.T trades at ¥283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3192.T's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3192.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3192.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3192.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3174.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3174.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3174.T trades at ¥718.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3174.T's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3174.T's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3174.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3174.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3416.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3416.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3416.T trades at ¥984.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3416.T's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3416.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3416.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3416.T's competition here
4937.T vs 7618.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7618.T has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 7618.T trades at ¥479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 7618.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7618.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 7618.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 7618.T's competition here
4937.T vs 3658.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3658.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 3658.T trades at ¥4,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 3658.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3658.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 3658.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 3658.T's competition here
4937.T vs 2729.T Comparison August 2025
4937.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4937.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2729.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 4937.T is priced at ¥1,185.00, while 2729.T trades at ¥2,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4937.T currently has a P/E ratio of 97.21, whereas 2729.T's P/E ratio is -87.28. In terms of profitability, 4937.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2729.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4937.T is more volatile compared to 2729.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4937.T.Check 2729.T's competition here