Secure, Inc.
Secure, Inc. (4264.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (4264.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4264.T | ¥1,615.00 | -0.80% | 9B | 80.67 | ¥20.02 | N/A |
| 9735.T | ¥5,450.00 | -0.64% | 2.2T | 20.96 | ¥259.99 | +1.79% |
| 2331.T | ¥1,136.50 | +1.29% | 551.1B | 20.50 | ¥55.43 | +2.18% |
| 6744.T | ¥3,930.00 | -1.13% | 231.3B | 20.93 | ¥187.77 | +1.93% |
| 7734.T | ¥3,265.00 | -1.80% | 150B | 18.96 | ¥172.23 | +1.23% |
| 1909.T | ¥6,210.00 | +0.32% | 41.6B | 10.52 | ¥590.53 | +0.89% |
| 9740.T | ¥2,506.00 | -1.53% | 36.2B | 11.29 | ¥221.92 | +2.39% |
| 6809.T | ¥1,145.00 | +1.33% | 34.4B | 14.56 | ¥78.65 | +3.49% |
| 9686.T | ¥1,641.00 | -1.68% | 17B | 24.46 | ¥67.09 | +2.44% |
| 6797.T | ¥1,284.00 | -1.98% | 15.1B | 6.83 | ¥188.12 | +3.31% |
Stock Comparison
4264.T vs 9735.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 9735.T has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 9735.T trades at ¥5,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 9735.T's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9735.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is more volatile compared to 9735.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 9735.T's competition here
4264.T vs 2331.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 2331.T has a market cap of 551.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 2331.T trades at ¥1,136.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 2331.T's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2331.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 2331.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 2331.T's competition here
4264.T vs 6744.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 6744.T has a market cap of 231.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 6744.T trades at ¥3,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 6744.T's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6744.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is more volatile compared to 6744.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 6744.T's competition here
4264.T vs 7734.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 7734.T has a market cap of 150B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 7734.T trades at ¥3,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 7734.T's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7734.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 7734.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 7734.T's competition here
4264.T vs 1909.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 1909.T has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 1909.T trades at ¥6,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 1909.T's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1909.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 1909.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 1909.T's competition here
4264.T vs 9740.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 9740.T has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 9740.T trades at ¥2,506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 9740.T's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9740.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is more volatile compared to 9740.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 9740.T's competition here
4264.T vs 6809.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 6809.T has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 6809.T trades at ¥1,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 6809.T's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6809.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 6809.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 6809.T's competition here
4264.T vs 9686.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 9686.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 9686.T trades at ¥1,641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 9686.T's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9686.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 9686.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 9686.T's competition here
4264.T vs 6797.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 6797.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 6797.T trades at ¥1,284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 6797.T's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6797.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 6797.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 6797.T's competition here
4264.T vs 6870.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 6870.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 6870.T trades at ¥1,726.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 6870.T's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6870.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 6870.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 6870.T's competition here
4264.T vs 4754.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 4754.T has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 4754.T trades at ¥1,473.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 4754.T's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4754.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is more volatile compared to 4754.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 4754.T's competition here
4264.T vs 7058.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 7058.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 7058.T trades at ¥2,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 7058.T's P/E ratio is -104.17. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7058.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is more volatile compared to 7058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 7058.T's competition here
4264.T vs 7464.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 7464.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 7464.T trades at ¥1,625.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 7464.T's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7464.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is more volatile compared to 7464.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 7464.T's competition here
4264.T vs 7116.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 7116.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 7116.T trades at ¥851.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 7116.T's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7116.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is more volatile compared to 7116.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 7116.T's competition here
4264.T vs 3782.T Comparison August 2025
4264.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4264.T stands at 9B. In comparison, 3782.T has a market cap of 429.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 4264.T is priced at ¥1,615.00, while 3782.T trades at ¥8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4264.T currently has a P/E ratio of 80.67, whereas 3782.T's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 4264.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3782.T's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 4264.T is less volatile compared to 3782.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4264.T.Check 3782.T's competition here