Advertisement
Loading...

GraniteShares 3x Short Danone D

3SDA.PAEURONEXT
Financial Services
Asset Management - Leveraged
2.75
-0.12(-4.11%)
U.S. Market opens in 41h 6m
Advertisement

GraniteShares 3x Short Danone D (3SDA.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (3SDA.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
3SDA.PA€2.76-4.11%0N/AN/AN/A
LQQ.PA€2,053.50+0.56%1.5BN/AN/AN/A
CL2.PA€30.30+0.38%977.5MN/AN/AN/A
BX4.PA€0.63-0.03%225.8MN/AN/AN/A
LVE.PA€79.07-0.04%217.7MN/AN/AN/A
LVC.PA€44.65+0.19%196.2MN/AN/AN/A
BTPS.PA€17.50-0.28%103MN/AN/AN/A
SHC.PA€9.51-0.20%89.9MN/AN/AN/A
5QQQ.AS€3.02+1.88%56.1MN/AN/AN/A
DSP5.PA€4.50-0.75%37.4MN/AN/AN/A
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

3SDA.PA vs LQQ.PA Comparison May 2026

3SDA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3SDA.PA stands at 0. In comparison, LQQ.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3SDA.PA is priced at €2.76, while LQQ.PA trades at €2,053.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3SDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQQ.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3SDA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LQQ.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3SDA.PA is more volatile compared to LQQ.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3SDA.PA.Check LQQ.PA's competition here

Stock price comparison of stocks in the Financial Services Sector

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions