Loading...

GraniteShares 3x Short Barclays Daily ETC

3SBC.LLSE
Financial Services
Asset Management - Leveraged
£1678.50
£-51.00(-2.95%)

GraniteShares 3x Short Barclays Daily ETC (3SBC.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (3SBC.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
3SBC.L£1,678.50-2.95%12.2MN/AN/AN/A
LQQ3.L£20,000.50+3.80%38.9BN/AN/AN/A
3LUS.L£9,519.50+3.43%14BN/AN/AN/A
XSDX.L£810.90-0.25%13.7BN/AN/AN/A
3NVD.L£4,444.00+4.47%10.9BN/AN/AN/A
3LGO.L£7,924.50+2.20%10.5BN/AN/AN/A
XSD2.L£45.30-0.62%7.3BN/AN/AN/A
VDST.L£57.33+0.06%5.7BN/AN/AN/A
IGSD.L£74.89-0.56%5.4BN/AN/A+4.31%
GBS.L£309.71+1.06%4.1BN/AN/AN/A
Showing 1 to 10 of 100 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

3SBC.L vs LQQ3.L Comparison August 2025

3SBC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3SBC.L stands at 12.2M. In comparison, LQQ3.L has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3SBC.L is priced at £1,678.50, while LQQ3.L trades at £20,000.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3SBC.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQQ3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3SBC.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQQ3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3SBC.L is less volatile compared to LQQ3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3SBC.L.Check LQQ3.L's competition here

Stock price comparison of stocks in the Financial Services Sector

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;