Reckitt Benckiser Group plc

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, PRG.DE has a market cap of 306.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while PRG.DE trades at €130.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas PRG.DE's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRG.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is more volatile compared to PRG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check PRG.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, LOR.DE has a market cap of 199B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while LOR.DE trades at €373.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas LOR.DE's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOR.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to LOR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check LOR.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, UNVB.DE has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while UNVB.DE trades at €51.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas UNVB.DE's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNVB.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is more volatile compared to UNVB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check UNVB.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, CPA.DE has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while CPA.DE trades at €71.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas CPA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPA.DE's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is more volatile compared to CPA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check CPA.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, KMY.DE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while KMY.DE trades at €114.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas KMY.DE's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KMY.DE's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is more volatile compared to KMY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check KMY.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, HEN3.DE has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while HEN3.DE trades at €67.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas HEN3.DE's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEN3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to HEN3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check HEN3.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, HEN3.F has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while HEN3.F trades at €67.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas HEN3.F's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEN3.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to HEN3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check HEN3.F's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, HEN.DE has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while HEN.DE trades at €62.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas HEN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEN.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to HEN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check HEN.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, BEI.DE has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while BEI.DE trades at €106.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas BEI.DE's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEI.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to BEI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check BEI.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, CXU.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while CXU.DE trades at €77.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas CXU.DE's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CXU.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to CXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check CXU.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, CO3A.DE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while CO3A.DE trades at €5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas CO3A.DE's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CO3A.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to CO3A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check CO3A.DE's competition here

3RB.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3RB.DE stands at 43.3B. In comparison, LEI.DE has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3RB.DE is priced at €63.76, while LEI.DE trades at €15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3RB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.08, whereas LEI.DE's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, 3RB.DE's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEI.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3RB.DE is less volatile compared to LEI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3RB.DE.Check LEI.DE's competition here