OpenDoor Inc.
OpenDoor Inc. (3926.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3926.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926.T | ¥311.00 | -3.42% | 9.6B | -44.24 | -¥7.03 | N/A |
| 4689.T | ¥393.20 | +0.51% | 2.7T | 13.57 | ¥28.97 | +1.78% |
| 2371.T | ¥2,225.50 | +4.41% | 440.3B | 22.22 | ¥100.18 | +2.25% |
| 4194.T | ¥7,377.00 | +1.32% | 296.7B | 17.13 | ¥430.75 | N/A |
| 4825.T | ¥1,974.00 | +3.03% | 87.7B | 24.19 | ¥81.62 | +4.05% |
| 4298.T | ¥2,090.00 | -0.14% | 84.2B | 0.00 | ¥1,658,883,580.00 | +1.20% |
| 3491.T | ¥1,528.00 | +3.10% | 62.7B | 15.70 | ¥97.34 | +0.52% |
| 3688.T | ¥2,091.00 | +0.05% | 52.9B | 0.00 | ¥138,182,128.00 | +2.77% |
| 9474.T | ¥985.00 | +0.20% | 52.6B | 17.56 | ¥56.10 | +3.83% |
| 3661.T | ¥680.00 | +0.59% | 48.2B | 19.19 | ¥35.44 | +1.84% |
Stock Comparison
3926.T vs 4689.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4689.T has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4689.T trades at ¥393.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4689.T's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4689.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4689.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4689.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2371.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2371.T has a market cap of 440.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2371.T trades at ¥2,225.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2371.T's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2371.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2371.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2371.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4194.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4194.T has a market cap of 296.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4194.T trades at ¥7,377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4194.T's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4194.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4194.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4194.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4825.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4825.T has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4825.T trades at ¥1,974.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4825.T's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4825.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4825.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4825.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4298.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4298.T has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4298.T trades at ¥2,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4298.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4298.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4298.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4298.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3491.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3491.T has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3491.T trades at ¥1,528.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3491.T's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3491.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3491.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3491.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3688.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3688.T has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3688.T trades at ¥2,091.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3688.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3688.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3688.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3688.T's competition here
3926.T vs 9474.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 9474.T has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 9474.T trades at ¥985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 9474.T's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 9474.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 9474.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 9474.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3661.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3661.T has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3661.T trades at ¥680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3661.T's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3661.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3661.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3661.T's competition here
3926.T vs 5243.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 5243.T has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 5243.T trades at ¥2,541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 5243.T's P/E ratio is 94.81. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 5243.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is less volatile compared to 5243.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 5243.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3679.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3679.T has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3679.T trades at ¥414.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3679.T's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3679.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3679.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3679.T's competition here
3926.T vs 9467.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 9467.T has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 9467.T trades at ¥1,232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 9467.T's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 9467.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 9467.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 9467.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3843.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3843.T has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3843.T trades at ¥1,542.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3843.T's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3843.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3843.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3843.T's competition here
3926.T vs 7047.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 7047.T has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 7047.T trades at ¥2,286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 7047.T's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 7047.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 7047.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 7047.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3922.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3922.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3922.T trades at ¥2,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3922.T's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3922.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3922.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3922.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3989.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3989.T has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3989.T trades at ¥1,195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3989.T's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3989.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3989.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3989.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2120.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2120.T has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2120.T trades at ¥196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2120.T's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2120.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2120.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2120.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3901.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3901.T has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3901.T trades at ¥1,532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3901.T's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3901.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3901.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3901.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6037.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6037.T has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6037.T trades at ¥941.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6037.T's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6037.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6037.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6037.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3662.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3662.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3662.T trades at ¥976.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3662.T's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3662.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3662.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3662.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2477.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2477.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2477.T trades at ¥2,703.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2477.T's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2477.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2477.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2477.T's competition here
3926.T vs 336A.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 336A.T has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 336A.T trades at ¥658.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 336A.T's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 336A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 336A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 336A.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4482.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4482.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4482.T trades at ¥734.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4482.T's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4482.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4482.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4482.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3675.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3675.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3675.T trades at ¥630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3675.T's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3675.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3675.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3675.T's competition here
3926.T vs 9245.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 9245.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 9245.T trades at ¥2,149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 9245.T's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 9245.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 9245.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 9245.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6562.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6562.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6562.T trades at ¥891.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6562.T's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6562.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6562.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6562.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2489.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2489.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2489.T trades at ¥271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2489.T's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2489.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2489.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2489.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3990.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3990.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3990.T trades at ¥530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3990.T's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3990.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3990.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3990.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4800.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4800.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4800.T trades at ¥823.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4800.T's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4800.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4800.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4800.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4644.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4644.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4644.T trades at ¥1,037.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4644.T's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4644.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4644.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4644.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2193.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2193.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2193.T trades at ¥136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2193.T's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2193.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2193.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2193.T's competition here
3926.T vs 5034.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 5034.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 5034.T trades at ¥2,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 5034.T's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 5034.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 5034.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 5034.T's competition here
3926.T vs 5570.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 5570.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 5570.T trades at ¥677.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 5570.T's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 5570.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 5570.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 5570.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2440.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2440.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2440.T trades at ¥150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2440.T's P/E ratio is 176.47. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2440.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2440.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2440.T's competition here
3926.T vs 7082.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 7082.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 7082.T trades at ¥825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 7082.T's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 7082.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 7082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 7082.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6180.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6180.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6180.T trades at ¥4,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6180.T's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6180.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6180.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6180.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3981.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3981.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3981.T trades at ¥1,272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3981.T's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3981.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3981.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3981.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6026.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6026.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6026.T trades at ¥6,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6026.T's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6026.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6026.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6026.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4176.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4176.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4176.T trades at ¥280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4176.T's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4176.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4176.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4176.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4436.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4436.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4436.T trades at ¥409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4436.T's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4436.T's ROE of -6.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4436.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4436.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3845.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3845.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3845.T trades at ¥270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3845.T's P/E ratio is -48.30. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3845.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is less volatile compared to 3845.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3845.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3691.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3691.T has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3691.T trades at ¥1,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3691.T's P/E ratio is -79.95. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3691.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3691.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3691.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6185.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6185.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6185.T trades at ¥383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6185.T's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6185.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6185.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6185.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6049.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6049.T has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6049.T trades at ¥267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6049.T's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6049.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6049.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6049.T's competition here
3926.T vs 5571.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 5571.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 5571.T trades at ¥1,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 5571.T's P/E ratio is -1101.01. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 5571.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 5571.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 5571.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2454.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2454.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2454.T trades at ¥363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2454.T's P/E ratio is 88.11. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2454.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2454.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2454.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3815.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3815.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3815.T trades at ¥461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3815.T's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3815.T's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3815.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3815.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6081.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6081.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6081.T trades at ¥285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6081.T's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6081.T's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is less volatile compared to 6081.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6081.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3995.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3995.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3995.T trades at ¥360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3995.T's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3995.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is less volatile compared to 3995.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3995.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3770.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3770.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3770.T trades at ¥419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3770.T's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3770.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is less volatile compared to 3770.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3770.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3674.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3674.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3674.T trades at ¥331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3674.T's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3674.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3674.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6032.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6032.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6032.T trades at ¥347.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6032.T's P/E ratio is 156.31. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6032.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6032.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6032.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6054.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6054.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6054.T trades at ¥118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6054.T's P/E ratio is -145.68. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6054.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6054.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6054.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6046.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6046.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6046.T trades at ¥172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6046.T's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6046.T's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6046.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6046.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3930.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3930.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3930.T trades at ¥1,059.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3930.T's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3930.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is less volatile compared to 3930.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3930.T's competition here
3926.T vs 5138.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 5138.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 5138.T trades at ¥614.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 5138.T's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 5138.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 5138.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 5138.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3645.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3645.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3645.T trades at ¥304.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3645.T's P/E ratio is 72.90. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3645.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3645.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3645.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3961.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3961.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3961.T trades at ¥763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3961.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3961.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3961.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3961.T's competition here
3926.T vs 7356.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 7356.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 7356.T trades at ¥141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 7356.T's P/E ratio is 178.48. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 7356.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is less volatile compared to 7356.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 7356.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3985.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3985.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3985.T trades at ¥197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3985.T's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3985.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3985.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3985.T's competition here
3926.T vs 198A.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 198A.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 198A.T trades at ¥204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 198A.T's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 198A.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 198A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 198A.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3646.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3646.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3646.T trades at ¥368.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3646.T's P/E ratio is -127.78. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3646.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3646.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3646.T's competition here
3926.T vs 7077.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 7077.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 7077.T trades at ¥956.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 7077.T's P/E ratio is -27.13. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 7077.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 7077.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 7077.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4057.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4057.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4057.T trades at ¥388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4057.T's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4057.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4057.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4057.T's competition here
3926.T vs 2459.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 2459.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 2459.T trades at ¥208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 2459.T's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 2459.T's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 2459.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 2459.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6048.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6048.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6048.T trades at ¥95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6048.T's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6048.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6048.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6048.T's competition here
3926.T vs 4059.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 4059.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 4059.T trades at ¥470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 4059.T's P/E ratio is 95.14. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 4059.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 4059.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 4059.T's competition here
3926.T vs 3624.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 3624.T has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 3624.T trades at ¥78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 3624.T's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 3624.T's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 3624.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 3624.T's competition here
3926.T vs 6579.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 6579.T has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 6579.T trades at ¥309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 6579.T's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 6579.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 6579.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 6579.T's competition here
3926.T vs 7138.T Comparison April 2026
3926.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3926.T stands at 9.6B. In comparison, 7138.T has a market cap of 369.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3926.T is priced at ¥311.00, while 7138.T trades at ¥235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3926.T currently has a P/E ratio of -44.24, whereas 7138.T's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, 3926.T's ROE is -0.29%, compared to 7138.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3926.T is more volatile compared to 7138.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3926.T.Check 7138.T's competition here