CrowdWorks Inc.
CrowdWorks Inc. (3900.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3900.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3900.T | ¥612.00 | -2.08% | 9.7B | -37.64 | -¥16.26 | +2.94% |
| 6098.T | ¥6,942.00 | +0.29% | 9.7T | 23.36 | ¥297.23 | +0.32% |
| 2181.T | ¥238.10 | +2.10% | 531.2B | 13.73 | ¥17.34 | +4.15% |
| 6028.T | ¥4,850.00 | +0.10% | 505.3B | 0.00 | ¥3,855,749,890.00 | +1.86% |
| 9744.T | ¥3,278.00 | -0.12% | 253.1B | 17.92 | ¥182.92 | +5.49% |
| 2427.T | ¥1,749.00 | -0.06% | 220.4B | 0.00 | ¥736,089,920.00 | +2.46% |
| 2154.T | ¥1,808.00 | +0.00% | 153.6B | 11.85 | ¥152.55 | +4.03% |
| 2124.T | ¥852.00 | +0.24% | 135B | 16.09 | ¥52.95 | +3.37% |
| 2146.T | ¥197.00 | +0.00% | 112.7B | 20.59 | ¥9.57 | +5.24% |
| 2379.T | ¥2,098.00 | +0.96% | 109.9B | 14.38 | ¥145.88 | +4.06% |
Stock Comparison
3900.T vs 6098.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6098.T has a market cap of 9.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6098.T trades at ¥6,942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6098.T's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6098.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6098.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6098.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2181.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2181.T has a market cap of 531.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2181.T trades at ¥238.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2181.T's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2181.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2181.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2181.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6028.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6028.T has a market cap of 505.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6028.T trades at ¥4,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6028.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6028.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6028.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6028.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9744.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9744.T has a market cap of 253.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9744.T trades at ¥3,278.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9744.T's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9744.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9744.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9744.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2427.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2427.T has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2427.T trades at ¥1,749.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2427.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2427.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2427.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2427.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2154.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2154.T has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2154.T trades at ¥1,808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2154.T's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2154.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2154.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2154.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2124.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2124.T has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2124.T trades at ¥852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2124.T's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2124.T's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2124.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2124.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2146.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2146.T has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2146.T trades at ¥197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2146.T's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2146.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2146.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2146.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2379.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2379.T has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2379.T trades at ¥2,098.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2379.T's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2379.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2379.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2379.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7088.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7088.T has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7088.T trades at ¥1,697.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7088.T's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7088.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7088.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7088.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9164.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9164.T has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9164.T trades at ¥875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9164.T's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9164.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9164.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9164.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2168.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2168.T has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2168.T trades at ¥1,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2168.T's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2168.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2168.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2168.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4848.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4848.T has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4848.T trades at ¥1,704.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4848.T's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4848.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4848.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4848.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4641.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4641.T has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4641.T trades at ¥2,598.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4641.T's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4641.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4641.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4641.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4318.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4318.T has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4318.T trades at ¥860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4318.T's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4318.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4318.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4318.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2429.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2429.T has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2429.T trades at ¥2,621.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2429.T's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2429.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2429.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2429.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4849.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4849.T has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4849.T trades at ¥1,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4849.T's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4849.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4849.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4849.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4377.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4377.T has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4377.T trades at ¥1,914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4377.T's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4377.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4377.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4377.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7059.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7059.T has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7059.T trades at ¥864.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7059.T's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7059.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7059.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7059.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2475.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2475.T has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2475.T trades at ¥1,532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2475.T's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2475.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2475.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2475.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6070.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6070.T has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6070.T trades at ¥2,426.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6070.T's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6070.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6070.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6070.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6089.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6089.T has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6089.T trades at ¥1,164.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6089.T's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6089.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6089.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6089.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6569.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6569.T has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6569.T trades at ¥775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6569.T's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6569.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is less volatile compared to 6569.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6569.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6539.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6539.T has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6539.T trades at ¥985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6539.T's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6539.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6539.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6539.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2301.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2301.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2301.T trades at ¥1,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2301.T's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2301.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2301.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2301.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9332.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9332.T has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9332.T trades at ¥618.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9332.T's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9332.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9332.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9332.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2163.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2163.T has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2163.T trades at ¥1,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2163.T's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2163.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2163.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2471.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2471.T has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2471.T trades at ¥259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2471.T's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2471.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2471.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2471.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4433.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4433.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4433.T trades at ¥927.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4433.T's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4433.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4433.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4433.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6194.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6194.T has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6194.T trades at ¥668.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6194.T's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6194.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6194.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6194.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2410.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2410.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2410.T trades at ¥2,466.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2410.T's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2410.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2410.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2410.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7781.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7781.T has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7781.T trades at ¥1,475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7781.T's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7781.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7781.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7781.T's competition here
3900.T vs 3991.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 3991.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 3991.T trades at ¥1,132.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 3991.T's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 3991.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 3991.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 3991.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7374.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7374.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7374.T trades at ¥1,524.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7374.T's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7374.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7374.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7374.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7089.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7089.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7089.T trades at ¥1,174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7089.T's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7089.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7089.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7089.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7367.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7367.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7367.T trades at ¥320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7367.T's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7367.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7367.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7367.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7080.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7080.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7080.T trades at ¥900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7080.T's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7080.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7080.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7080.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9346.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9346.T has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9346.T trades at ¥1,663.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9346.T's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9346.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9346.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9346.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4177.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4177.T has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4177.T trades at ¥1,530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4177.T's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4177.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4177.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4177.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6551.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6551.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6551.T trades at ¥685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6551.T's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6551.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6551.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6551.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2136.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2136.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2136.T trades at ¥1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2136.T's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2136.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2136.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2136.T's competition here
3900.T vs 151A.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 151A.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 151A.T trades at ¥620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 151A.T's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 151A.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 151A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 151A.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9344.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9344.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9344.T trades at ¥902.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9344.T's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9344.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9344.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9344.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7361.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7361.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7361.T trades at ¥1,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7361.T's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7361.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7361.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7361.T's competition here
3900.T vs 330A.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 330A.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 330A.T trades at ¥590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 330A.T's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 330A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 330A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 330A.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6563.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6563.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6563.T trades at ¥573.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6563.T's P/E ratio is 33.61. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6563.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6563.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6563.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7064.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7064.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7064.T trades at ¥913.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7064.T's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7064.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7064.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7064.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4766.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4766.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4766.T trades at ¥228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4766.T's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4766.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 4766.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4766.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9242.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9242.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9242.T trades at ¥1,947.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9242.T's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9242.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9242.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9242.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7043.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7043.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7043.T trades at ¥819.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7043.T's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7043.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7043.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7043.T's competition here
3900.T vs 142A.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 142A.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 142A.T trades at ¥698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 142A.T's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 142A.T's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is less volatile compared to 142A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 142A.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6198.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6198.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6198.T trades at ¥235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6198.T's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6198.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6198.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6198.T's competition here
3900.T vs 6558.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 6558.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 6558.T trades at ¥698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 6558.T's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6558.T's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 6558.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 6558.T's competition here
3900.T vs 4265.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 4265.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 4265.T trades at ¥385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 4265.T's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 4265.T's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is less volatile compared to 4265.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 4265.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9253.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9253.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9253.T trades at ¥716.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9253.T's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9253.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9253.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9253.T's competition here
3900.T vs 7041.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7041.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 7041.T trades at ¥307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 7041.T's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 7041.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 7041.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 7041.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9331.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9331.T has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9331.T trades at ¥681.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9331.T's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9331.T's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 9331.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9331.T's competition here
3900.T vs 9610.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 9610.T has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 9610.T trades at ¥128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 9610.T's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9610.T's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is less volatile compared to 9610.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 9610.T's competition here
3900.T vs 2412.T Comparison April 2026
3900.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3900.T stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 2412.T has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, 3900.T is priced at ¥612.00, while 2412.T trades at ¥2,168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3900.T currently has a P/E ratio of -37.64, whereas 2412.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3900.T's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2412.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3900.T is more volatile compared to 2412.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3900.T.Check 2412.T's competition here