NTT Data Intramart Corporation
NTT Data Intramart Corporation (3850.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3850.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3850.T | ¥2,888.00 | -2.04% | 14.5B | 21.25 | ¥140.31 | +1.34% |
| 4704.T | ¥5,240.00 | -1.84% | 675.9B | 19.81 | ¥261.03 | +2.85% |
| 3769.T | ¥8,204.00 | +0.40% | 621.2B | 28.80 | ¥284.35 | +1.76% |
| 4686.T | ¥3,490.00 | +0.29% | 221.9B | 15.84 | ¥218.13 | +0.62% |
| 4784.T | ¥690.00 | +0.44% | 184.8B | 33.22 | ¥20.29 | +3.05% |
| 3778.T | ¥2,481.00 | -5.20% | 104.4B | 63.79 | ¥40.90 | +0.15% |
| 3993.T | ¥2,652.00 | -4.84% | 81.8B | 30.44 | ¥86.40 | N/A |
| 4180.T | ¥782.00 | +1.30% | 77.4B | 30.35 | ¥25.01 | +0.24% |
| 5036.T | ¥1,463.00 | -4.94% | 65.9B | 12.42 | ¥118.01 | +2.76% |
| 3854.T | ¥2,379.00 | -1.98% | 59.1B | 15.03 | ¥157.27 | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
3850.T vs 4704.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4704.T has a market cap of 675.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4704.T trades at ¥5,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4704.T's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4704.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4704.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4704.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3769.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3769.T has a market cap of 621.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3769.T trades at ¥8,204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3769.T's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3769.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3769.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3769.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4686.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4686.T has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4686.T trades at ¥3,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4686.T's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4686.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4686.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4686.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4784.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4784.T has a market cap of 184.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4784.T trades at ¥690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4784.T's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4784.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4784.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4784.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3778.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3778.T has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3778.T trades at ¥2,481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3778.T's P/E ratio is 63.79. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3778.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 3778.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3778.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3993.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3993.T has a market cap of 81.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3993.T trades at ¥2,652.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3993.T's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3993.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 3993.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3993.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4180.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4180.T has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4180.T trades at ¥782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4180.T's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4180.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4180.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4180.T's competition here
3850.T vs 5036.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 5036.T has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 5036.T trades at ¥1,463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 5036.T's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5036.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 5036.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 5036.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3854.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3854.T has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3854.T trades at ¥2,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3854.T's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3854.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3854.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3854.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4435.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4435.T has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4435.T trades at ¥4,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4435.T's P/E ratio is 64.11. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4435.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4435.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4435.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4419.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4419.T has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4419.T trades at ¥952.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4419.T's P/E ratio is 55.77. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4419.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4419.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4419.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4687.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4687.T has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4687.T trades at ¥912.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4687.T's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4687.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4687.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4687.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4431.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4431.T has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4431.T trades at ¥2,176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4431.T's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4431.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4431.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4431.T's competition here
3850.T vs 147A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 147A.T has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 147A.T trades at ¥900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 147A.T's P/E ratio is 77.66. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 147A.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 147A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 147A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4417.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4417.T has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4417.T trades at ¥2,338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4417.T's P/E ratio is 50.96. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4417.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4417.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4417.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3040.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3040.T has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3040.T trades at ¥1,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3040.T's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3040.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3040.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3040.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3741.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3741.T has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3741.T trades at ¥2,881.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3741.T's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3741.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3741.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3741.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4475.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4475.T has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4475.T trades at ¥913.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4475.T's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4475.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4475.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4475.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4847.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4847.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4847.T trades at ¥952.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4847.T's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4847.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4847.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4847.T's competition here
3850.T vs 135A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 135A.T has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 135A.T trades at ¥2,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 135A.T's P/E ratio is 67.51. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 135A.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 135A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 135A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3694.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3694.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3694.T trades at ¥415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3694.T's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3694.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3694.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3694.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3677.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3677.T has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3677.T trades at ¥927.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3677.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3677.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3677.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3677.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3915.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3915.T has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3915.T trades at ¥1,505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3915.T's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3915.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3915.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3915.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3992.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3992.T has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3992.T trades at ¥481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3992.T's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3992.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3992.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3992.T's competition here
3850.T vs 5132.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 5132.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 5132.T trades at ¥2,274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 5132.T's P/E ratio is 51.07. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5132.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 5132.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 5132.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4493.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4493.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4493.T trades at ¥1,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4493.T's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4493.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4493.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4493.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3914.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3914.T has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3914.T trades at ¥2,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3914.T's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3914.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3914.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3914.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3665.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3665.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3665.T trades at ¥379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3665.T's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3665.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3665.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3665.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4434.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4434.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4434.T trades at ¥1,883.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4434.T's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4434.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4434.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4434.T's competition here
3850.T vs 2428.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 2428.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 2428.T trades at ¥644.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 2428.T's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 2428.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 2428.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 2428.T's competition here
3850.T vs 2315.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 2315.T has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 2315.T trades at ¥76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 2315.T's P/E ratio is 62.30. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 2315.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 2315.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 2315.T's competition here
3850.T vs 5582.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 5582.T has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 5582.T trades at ¥2,215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 5582.T's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5582.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 5582.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 5582.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3633.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3633.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3633.T trades at ¥1,831.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3633.T's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3633.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3633.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3633.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4667.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4667.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4667.T trades at ¥1,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4667.T's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4667.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4667.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4667.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4268.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4268.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4268.T trades at ¥838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4268.T's P/E ratio is 135.16. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4268.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4268.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4268.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4811.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4811.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4811.T trades at ¥791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4811.T's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4811.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4811.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4811.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4374.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4374.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4374.T trades at ¥2,309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4374.T's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4374.T's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4374.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4374.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4488.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4488.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4488.T trades at ¥2,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4488.T's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4488.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4488.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4488.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4430.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4430.T has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4430.T trades at ¥1,734.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4430.T's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4430.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4430.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4430.T's competition here
3850.T vs 9558.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 9558.T has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 9558.T trades at ¥2,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 9558.T's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9558.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 9558.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 9558.T's competition here
3850.T vs 338A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 338A.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 338A.T trades at ¥2,587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 338A.T's P/E ratio is -194.51. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 338A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 338A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 338A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3927.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3927.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3927.T trades at ¥1,198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3927.T's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3927.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 3927.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3927.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3623.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3623.T has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3623.T trades at ¥1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3623.T's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3623.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 3623.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3623.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4414.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4414.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4414.T trades at ¥979.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4414.T's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4414.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4414.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4414.T's competition here
3850.T vs 173A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 173A.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 173A.T trades at ¥1,433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 173A.T's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 173A.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 173A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 173A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4496.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4496.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4496.T trades at ¥754.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4496.T's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4496.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4496.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4496.T's competition here
3850.T vs 5129.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 5129.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 5129.T trades at ¥330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 5129.T's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5129.T's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 5129.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 5129.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4270.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4270.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4270.T trades at ¥1,932.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4270.T's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4270.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4270.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4270.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3999.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3999.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3999.T trades at ¥833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3999.T's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3999.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3999.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3999.T's competition here
3850.T vs 145A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 145A.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 145A.T trades at ¥787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 145A.T's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 145A.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 145A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 145A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 7351.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 7351.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 7351.T trades at ¥457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 7351.T's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7351.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 7351.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 7351.T's competition here
3850.T vs 5252.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 5252.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 5252.T trades at ¥851.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 5252.T's P/E ratio is 40.82. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5252.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 5252.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 5252.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3858.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3858.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3858.T trades at ¥328.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3858.T's P/E ratio is -108.20. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3858.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3858.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3858.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3680.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3680.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3680.T trades at ¥213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3680.T's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3680.T's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3680.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3680.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4391.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4391.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4391.T trades at ¥1,038.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4391.T's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4391.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4391.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4391.T's competition here
3850.T vs 9417.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 9417.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 9417.T trades at ¥328.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 9417.T's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9417.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 9417.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 9417.T's competition here
3850.T vs 195A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 195A.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 195A.T trades at ¥958.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 195A.T's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 195A.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 195A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 195A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4494.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4494.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4494.T trades at ¥724.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4494.T's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4494.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4494.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4494.T's competition here
3850.T vs 6662.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 6662.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 6662.T trades at ¥213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 6662.T's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6662.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 6662.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 6662.T's competition here
3850.T vs 2351.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 2351.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 2351.T trades at ¥378.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 2351.T's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 2351.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 2351.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 2351.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3627.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3627.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3627.T trades at ¥252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3627.T's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3627.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3627.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3627.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3987.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3987.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3987.T trades at ¥507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3987.T's P/E ratio is -75.37. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3987.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 3987.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3987.T's competition here
3850.T vs 5126.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 5126.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 5126.T trades at ¥1,623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 5126.T's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5126.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 5126.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 5126.T's competition here
3850.T vs 281A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 281A.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 281A.T trades at ¥457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 281A.T's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 281A.T's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 281A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 281A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 6659.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 6659.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 6659.T trades at ¥37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 6659.T's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6659.T's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 6659.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 6659.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4288.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4288.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4288.T trades at ¥536.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4288.T's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4288.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 4288.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4288.T's competition here
3850.T vs 3042.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 3042.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 3042.T trades at ¥275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 3042.T's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3042.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is less volatile compared to 3042.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 3042.T's competition here
3850.T vs 137A.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 137A.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 137A.T trades at ¥700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 137A.T's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 137A.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 137A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 137A.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4178.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4178.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4178.T trades at ¥535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4178.T's P/E ratio is 87.70. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4178.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4178.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4178.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4378.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4378.T has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4378.T trades at ¥457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4378.T's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4378.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4378.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4378.T's competition here
3850.T vs 4073.T Comparison April 2026
3850.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3850.T stands at 14.5B. In comparison, 4073.T has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3850.T is priced at ¥2,888.00, while 4073.T trades at ¥509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3850.T currently has a P/E ratio of 21.25, whereas 4073.T's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, 3850.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4073.T's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3850.T is more volatile compared to 4073.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3850.T.Check 4073.T's competition here