China Harmony Auto Holding Limited
China Harmony Auto Holding Limited 3836.HK Peers
See (3836.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3836.HK | $0.58 | -3.33% | 866.10M | -2.76 | -$0.21 | +6.38% |
| 0881.HK | $12.40 | +1.47% | 29.35B | 8.61 | $1.44 | +6.43% |
| 3669.HK | $2.60 | +0.39% | 4.87B | 21.67 | $0.12 | +4.32% |
| 1268.HK | $2.21 | +2.79% | 2.98B | -1.22 | -$1.81 | +1.63% |
| 1872.HK | $4.06 | +7.12% | 2.28B | -19.33 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| 0693.HK | $1.13 | +5.61% | 2.28B | 4.71 | $0.24 | +5.75% |
| 0526.HK | $0.10 | -0.96% | 910.93M | 2.58 | $0.04 | N/A |
| 2418.HK | $1.26 | N/A | 696.07M | 18.00 | $0.07 | +3.85% |
| 1728.HK | $0.12 | -0.83% | 401.64M | -0.20 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| 6909.HK | $0.59 | -4.84% | 363.60M | -14.75 | -$0.04 | +5.59% |
Stock Comparison
3836.HK vs 0881.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 0881.HK has a market cap of 29.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 0881.HK trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 0881.HK's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0881.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is more volatile compared to 0881.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 3669.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 3669.HK has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 3669.HK trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 3669.HK's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 3669.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is more volatile compared to 3669.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 1268.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 1268.HK has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 1268.HK trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 1268.HK's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1268.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is more volatile compared to 1268.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 1872.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 1872.HK has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 1872.HK trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 1872.HK's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1872.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 1872.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 0693.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 0693.HK has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 0693.HK trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 0693.HK's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0693.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is more volatile compared to 0693.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 0526.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 0526.HK has a market cap of 910.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 0526.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 0526.HK's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0526.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 0526.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 2418.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 2418.HK has a market cap of 696.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 2418.HK trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 2418.HK's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 2418.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is more volatile compared to 2418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 1728.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 1728.HK has a market cap of 401.64M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 1728.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 1728.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1728.HK's ROE of -20.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is more volatile compared to 1728.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 6909.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 6909.HK has a market cap of 363.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 6909.HK trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 6909.HK's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 6909.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 6909.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 1130.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 1130.HK has a market cap of 361.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 1130.HK trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 1130.HK's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1130.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 1130.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 1293.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 1293.HK has a market cap of 244.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 1293.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 1293.HK's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1293.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 1293.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 0970.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 0970.HK has a market cap of 220.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 0970.HK trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 0970.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0970.HK's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 0970.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 1771.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 1771.HK has a market cap of 189.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 1771.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 1771.HK's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1771.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 1771.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 1959.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 1959.HK has a market cap of 161.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 1959.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 1959.HK's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1959.HK's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is more volatile compared to 1959.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.
3836.HK vs 8126.HK Comparison
3836.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3836.HK stands at 866.10M. In comparison, 8126.HK has a market cap of 18.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 3836.HK is priced at $0.58, while 8126.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3836.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.76, whereas 8126.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 3836.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 8126.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3836.HK is less volatile compared to 8126.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3836.HK.