Wealth Management, Inc.
Wealth Management, Inc. (3772.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3772.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3772.T | ¥1,054.00 | +0.57% | 20.3B | 108.82 | ¥9.75 | +1.89% |
| 1557.T | ¥103,700.00 | +2.17% | 96.2T | 8.58 | ¥11,854.00 | +1.11% |
| 1330.T | ¥56,310.00 | +3.74% | 7.5T | 19.02 | ¥2,817.15 | +1.34% |
| 1306.T | ¥389.20 | +3.40% | 3.3T | 1.54 | ¥241.62 | +18.71% |
| 1475.T | ¥380.00 | +3.77% | 2.8T | 16.62 | ¥21.75 | +1.83% |
| 1591.T | ¥33,570.00 | +3.45% | 2.2T | 15.63 | ¥2,058.66 | +1.90% |
| 8473.T | ¥3,003.00 | +4.78% | 1.9T | 6.61 | ¥431.04 | +2.80% |
| 1364.T | ¥3,426.00 | +3.32% | 510.7B | 17.18 | ¥190.78 | +1.81% |
| 1615.T | ¥596.30 | +3.79% | 246B | 14.24 | ¥40.26 | +3.49% |
| 8616.T | ¥739.00 | +3.65% | 179.2B | 14.37 | ¥49.56 | +6.22% |
Stock Comparison
3772.T vs 1557.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1557.T has a market cap of 96.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1557.T trades at ¥103,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1557.T's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1557.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 1557.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1557.T's competition here
3772.T vs 1330.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1330.T has a market cap of 7.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1330.T trades at ¥56,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1330.T's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1330.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 1330.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1330.T's competition here
3772.T vs 1306.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1306.T has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1306.T trades at ¥389.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1306.T's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1306.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 1306.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1306.T's competition here
3772.T vs 1475.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1475.T has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1475.T trades at ¥380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1475.T's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1475.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 1475.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1475.T's competition here
3772.T vs 1591.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1591.T has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1591.T trades at ¥33,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1591.T's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1591.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 1591.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1591.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8473.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8473.T has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8473.T trades at ¥3,003.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8473.T's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8473.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 8473.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8473.T's competition here
3772.T vs 1364.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1364.T has a market cap of 510.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1364.T trades at ¥3,426.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1364.T's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1364.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 1364.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1364.T's competition here
3772.T vs 1615.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1615.T has a market cap of 246B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1615.T trades at ¥596.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1615.T's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1615.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 1615.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1615.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8616.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8616.T has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8616.T trades at ¥739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8616.T's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8616.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 8616.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8616.T's competition here
3772.T vs 319A.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 319A.T has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 319A.T trades at ¥11,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 319A.T's P/E ratio is 188.02. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 319A.T's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 319A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 319A.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8595.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8595.T has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8595.T trades at ¥2,283.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8595.T's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8595.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 8595.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8595.T's competition here
3772.T vs 7342.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 7342.T has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 7342.T trades at ¥1,942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 7342.T's P/E ratio is 222.20. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7342.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 7342.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 7342.T's competition here
3772.T vs 5842.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 5842.T has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 5842.T trades at ¥3,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 5842.T's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5842.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 5842.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 5842.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8739.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8739.T has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8739.T trades at ¥1,922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8739.T's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8739.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 8739.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8739.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8624.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8624.T has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8624.T trades at ¥1,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8624.T's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8624.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 8624.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8624.T's competition here
3772.T vs 6620.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 6620.T has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 6620.T trades at ¥720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 6620.T's P/E ratio is 112.63. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6620.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 6620.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 6620.T's competition here
3772.T vs 4310.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 4310.T has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 4310.T trades at ¥2,601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 4310.T's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4310.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 4310.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 4310.T's competition here
3772.T vs 2998.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 2998.T has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 2998.T trades at ¥739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 2998.T's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2998.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 2998.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 2998.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8737.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8737.T has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8737.T trades at ¥649.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8737.T's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8737.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 8737.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8737.T's competition here
3772.T vs 9257.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 9257.T has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 9257.T trades at ¥741.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 9257.T's P/E ratio is -95.33. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9257.T's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 9257.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 9257.T's competition here
3772.T vs 3454.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 3454.T has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 3454.T trades at ¥1,194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 3454.T's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3454.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 3454.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 3454.T's competition here
3772.T vs 2134.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 2134.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 2134.T trades at ¥30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 2134.T's P/E ratio is -11.84. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2134.T's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 2134.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 2134.T's competition here
3772.T vs 7347.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 7347.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 7347.T trades at ¥727.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 7347.T's P/E ratio is 198.04. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7347.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 7347.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 7347.T's competition here
3772.T vs 4479.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 4479.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 4479.T trades at ¥914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 4479.T's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4479.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 4479.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 4479.T's competition here
3772.T vs 254A.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 254A.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 254A.T trades at ¥1,094.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 254A.T's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 254A.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 254A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 254A.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8462.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8462.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8462.T trades at ¥985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8462.T's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8462.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 8462.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8462.T's competition here
3772.T vs 1329.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1329.T has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 1329.T trades at ¥5,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 1329.T's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1329.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 1329.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 1329.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8783.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8783.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8783.T trades at ¥204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8783.T's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8783.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 8783.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8783.T's competition here
3772.T vs 3121.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 3121.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 3121.T trades at ¥220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 3121.T's P/E ratio is -74.74. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3121.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 3121.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 3121.T's competition here
3772.T vs 3113.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 3113.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 3113.T trades at ¥86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 3113.T's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3113.T's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 3113.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 3113.T's competition here
3772.T vs 8518.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 8518.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 8518.T trades at ¥160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 8518.T's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8518.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 8518.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 8518.T's competition here
3772.T vs 7345.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 7345.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 7345.T trades at ¥1,186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 7345.T's P/E ratio is 1269.41. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7345.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 7345.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 7345.T's competition here
3772.T vs 3266.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 3266.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 3266.T trades at ¥88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 3266.T's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3266.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 3266.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 3266.T's competition here
3772.T vs 7162.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 7162.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 7162.T trades at ¥231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 7162.T's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7162.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is less volatile compared to 7162.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 7162.T's competition here
3772.T vs 0P00012I6C.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 0P00012I6C.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 0P00012I6C.T trades at ¥36,778.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 0P00012I6C.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0P00012I6C.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 0P00012I6C.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 0P00012I6C.T's competition here
3772.T vs 0P00001CGE.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 0P00001CGE.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 0P00001CGE.T trades at ¥28,905.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 0P00001CGE.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0P00001CGE.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 0P00001CGE.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 0P00001CGE.T's competition here
3772.T vs 0P00001CIF.T Comparison April 2026
3772.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3772.T stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 0P00001CIF.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3772.T is priced at ¥1,054.00, while 0P00001CIF.T trades at ¥62,069.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3772.T currently has a P/E ratio of 108.82, whereas 0P00001CIF.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3772.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0P00001CIF.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3772.T is more volatile compared to 0P00001CIF.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3772.T.Check 0P00001CIF.T's competition here