Intertrade Co.,Ltd.
Intertrade Co.,Ltd. (3747.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3747.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3747.T | ¥482.00 | -0.41% | 3.4B | -21.79 | -¥21.98 | N/A |
| 8604.T | ¥1,005.00 | +0.88% | 3T | 8.19 | ¥122.73 | +4.67% |
| 8601.T | ¥1,057.00 | +1.20% | 1.5T | 9.78 | ¥107.69 | +4.18% |
| 2127.T | ¥760.00 | +4.58% | 228.5B | 20.87 | ¥34.52 | +2.08% |
| 8698.T | ¥797.00 | +2.44% | 195.1B | -33.59 | -¥22.98 | +3.25% |
| 8628.T | ¥740.00 | +1.37% | 187.9B | 17.92 | ¥40.73 | +5.48% |
| 8609.T | ¥657.00 | -7.59% | 130.8B | 11.30 | ¥57.45 | +4.62% |
| 7177.T | ¥838.00 | -0.48% | 98.9B | 22.22 | ¥37.72 | +5.07% |
| 6080.T | ¥2,974.00 | +1.09% | 94.9B | 15.46 | ¥193.29 | +1.34% |
| 9552.T | ¥1,373.00 | +0.59% | 79.9B | 20.70 | ¥65.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
3747.T vs 8604.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8604.T has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8604.T trades at ¥1,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8604.T's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8604.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8604.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8604.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8601.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8601.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8601.T trades at ¥1,057.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8601.T's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8601.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8601.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8601.T's competition here
3747.T vs 2127.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 2127.T has a market cap of 228.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 2127.T trades at ¥760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 2127.T's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 2127.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 2127.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 2127.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8698.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8698.T has a market cap of 195.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8698.T trades at ¥797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8698.T's P/E ratio is -33.59. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8698.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 8698.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8698.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8628.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8628.T has a market cap of 187.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8628.T trades at ¥740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8628.T's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8628.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8628.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8628.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8609.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8609.T has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8609.T trades at ¥657.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8609.T's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8609.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8609.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8609.T's competition here
3747.T vs 7177.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 7177.T has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 7177.T trades at ¥838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 7177.T's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 7177.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 7177.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 7177.T's competition here
3747.T vs 6080.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 6080.T has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 6080.T trades at ¥2,974.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 6080.T's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 6080.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 6080.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 6080.T's competition here
3747.T vs 9552.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 9552.T has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 9552.T trades at ¥1,373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 9552.T's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 9552.T's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 9552.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 9552.T's competition here
3747.T vs 6196.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 6196.T has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 6196.T trades at ¥3,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 6196.T's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 6196.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 6196.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 6196.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8613.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8613.T has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8613.T trades at ¥922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8613.T's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8613.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8613.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8613.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8707.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8707.T has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8707.T trades at ¥2,453.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8707.T's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8707.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8707.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8707.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8706.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8706.T has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8706.T trades at ¥1,476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8706.T's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8706.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8706.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8706.T's competition here
3747.T vs 7921.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 7921.T has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 7921.T trades at ¥3,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 7921.T's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 7921.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 7921.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 7921.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8708.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8708.T has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8708.T trades at ¥1,305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8708.T's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8708.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 8708.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8708.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8614.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8614.T has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8614.T trades at ¥511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8614.T's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8614.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8614.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8614.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8699.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8699.T has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8699.T trades at ¥1,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8699.T's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8699.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 8699.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8699.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8704.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8704.T has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8704.T trades at ¥1,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8704.T's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8704.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8704.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8704.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8622.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8622.T has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8622.T trades at ¥525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8622.T's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8622.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8622.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8622.T's competition here
3747.T vs 7185.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 7185.T has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 7185.T trades at ¥4,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 7185.T's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 7185.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 7185.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 7185.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8732.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8732.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8732.T trades at ¥473.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8732.T's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8732.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8732.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8732.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8747.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8747.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8747.T trades at ¥1,583.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8747.T's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8747.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8747.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8747.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8705.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8705.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8705.T trades at ¥171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8705.T's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8705.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8705.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8705.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8700.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8700.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8700.T trades at ¥1,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8700.T's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8700.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 8700.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8700.T's competition here
3747.T vs 7175.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 7175.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 7175.T trades at ¥1,077.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 7175.T's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 7175.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 7175.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 7175.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8746.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8746.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8746.T trades at ¥458.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8746.T's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8746.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 8746.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8746.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8617.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8617.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8617.T trades at ¥449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8617.T's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8617.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 8617.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8617.T's competition here
3747.T vs 8742.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 8742.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 8742.T trades at ¥292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 8742.T's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8742.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is more volatile compared to 8742.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 8742.T's competition here
3747.T vs 7360.T Comparison July 2025
3747.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3747.T stands at 3.4B. In comparison, 7360.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3747.T is priced at ¥482.00, while 7360.T trades at ¥953.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3747.T currently has a P/E ratio of -21.79, whereas 7360.T's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, 3747.T's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 7360.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3747.T is less volatile compared to 7360.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3747.T.Check 7360.T's competition here