China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited
China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited 3669.HK Peers
See (3669.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3669.HK | $2.58 | -0.77% | 4.83B | 21.50 | $0.12 | +4.36% |
| 0881.HK | $12.16 | -1.94% | 28.78B | 8.39 | $1.45 | +6.55% |
| 1268.HK | $2.10 | -4.98% | 2.83B | -1.16 | -$1.81 | +1.71% |
| 1872.HK | $4.33 | +6.65% | 2.43B | -22.79 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| 0693.HK | $1.12 | N/A | 2.25B | 4.67 | $0.24 | +5.80% |
| 0526.HK | $0.11 | +1.94% | 928.62M | 2.63 | $0.04 | N/A |
| 3836.HK | $0.58 | N/A | 866.10M | -2.64 | -$0.22 | +6.38% |
| 2418.HK | $1.26 | N/A | 696.07M | 18.00 | $0.07 | +3.85% |
| 1728.HK | $0.12 | -1.67% | 394.94M | -0.20 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| 6909.HK | $0.59 | N/A | 363.60M | -14.75 | -$0.04 | +5.59% |
Stock Comparison
3669.HK vs 0881.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 0881.HK has a market cap of 28.78B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 0881.HK trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 0881.HK's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0881.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 0881.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 1268.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 1268.HK has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 1268.HK trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 1268.HK's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1268.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1268.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 1872.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 1872.HK has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 1872.HK trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 1872.HK's P/E ratio is -22.79. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1872.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1872.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 0693.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 0693.HK has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 0693.HK trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 0693.HK's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0693.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 0693.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 0526.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 0526.HK has a market cap of 928.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 0526.HK trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 0526.HK's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0526.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 0526.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 3836.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 3836.HK has a market cap of 866.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 3836.HK trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 3836.HK's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3836.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 3836.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 2418.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 2418.HK has a market cap of 696.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 2418.HK trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 2418.HK's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2418.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 2418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 1728.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 1728.HK has a market cap of 394.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 1728.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 1728.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1728.HK's ROE of -20.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 1728.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 6909.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 6909.HK has a market cap of 363.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 6909.HK trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 6909.HK's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 6909.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 6909.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 1130.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 1130.HK has a market cap of 342.14M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 1130.HK trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 1130.HK's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1130.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1130.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 1293.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 1293.HK has a market cap of 244.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 1293.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 1293.HK's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1293.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1293.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 0970.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 0970.HK has a market cap of 208.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 0970.HK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 0970.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0970.HK's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 0970.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 1771.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 1771.HK has a market cap of 189.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 1771.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 1771.HK's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1771.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1771.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 1959.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 1959.HK has a market cap of 161.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 1959.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 1959.HK's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1959.HK's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 1959.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.
3669.HK vs 8126.HK Comparison
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4.83B. In comparison, 8126.HK has a market cap of 18.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at $2.58, while 8126.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas 8126.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8126.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 8126.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.