China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited
China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited (3669.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3669.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3669.HK | HK$2.07 | +2.99% | 4B | 17.58 | HK$0.12 | +6.63% |
| 0881.HK | HK$14.81 | +3.21% | 34.3B | 9.86 | HK$1.47 | +4.68% |
| 3836.HK | HK$2.20 | +6.28% | 3.2B | -9.86 | -HK$0.22 | N/A |
| 0693.HK | HK$1.47 | -0.68% | 3B | 6.25 | HK$0.24 | +5.00% |
| 1268.HK | HK$2.11 | +2.43% | 2.8B | -1.14 | -HK$1.83 | +2.33% |
| 1872.HK | HK$3.98 | -0.50% | 2.6B | -20.68 | -HK$0.19 | N/A |
| 1728.HK | HK$0.14 | -2.05% | 1.4B | -0.23 | -HK$0.61 | N/A |
| 2418.HK | HK$2.09 | +0.48% | 1.1B | 26.00 | HK$0.08 | +1.84% |
| 0526.HK | HK$0.09 | -4.30% | 822.5M | 2.32 | HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 0970.HK | HK$0.72 | +2.86% | 410.8M | 5.21 | HK$0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
3669.HK vs 0881.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 0881.HK has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 0881.HK trades at HK$14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 0881.HK's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0881.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 0881.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 0881.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 3836.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 3836.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 3836.HK trades at HK$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 3836.HK's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3836.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 3836.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 3836.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 0693.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 0693.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 0693.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 0693.HK's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0693.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 0693.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 0693.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1268.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1268.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1268.HK trades at HK$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1268.HK's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1268.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 1268.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1268.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1872.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1872.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1872.HK trades at HK$3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1872.HK's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1872.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 1872.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1872.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1728.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1728.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1728.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1728.HK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1728.HK's ROE of -20.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 1728.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1728.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 2418.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 2418.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 2418.HK trades at HK$2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 2418.HK's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2418.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 2418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 2418.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 0526.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 0526.HK has a market cap of 822.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 0526.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 0526.HK's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0526.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 0526.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 0526.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 0970.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 0970.HK has a market cap of 410.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 0970.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 0970.HK's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0970.HK's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 0970.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 0970.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 6909.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 6909.HK has a market cap of 388.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 6909.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 6909.HK's P/E ratio is -15.75. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 6909.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 6909.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 6909.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1130.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1130.HK has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1130.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1130.HK's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1130.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is more volatile compared to 1130.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1130.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1293.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1293.HK has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1293.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1293.HK's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1293.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1293.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1293.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1771.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1771.HK has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1771.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1771.HK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1771.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1771.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1771.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1959.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1959.HK has a market cap of 96.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1959.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1959.HK's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1959.HK's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1959.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1959.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 8126.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 8126.HK has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 8126.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 8126.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8126.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 8126.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 8126.HK's competition here
3669.HK vs 1365.HK Comparison August 2025
3669.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3669.HK stands at 4B. In comparison, 1365.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3669.HK is priced at HK$2.07, while 1365.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.58, whereas 1365.HK's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, 3669.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1365.HK's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3669.HK is less volatile compared to 1365.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3669.HK.Check 1365.HK's competition here