Enish,inc.
Enish,inc. (3667.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3667.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3667.T | ¥114.00 | -2.56% | 3.9B | -3.19 | -¥36.09 | N/A |
| 7974.T | ¥13,240.00 | +4.33% | 14.7T | 52.51 | ¥239.84 | +0.92% |
| 9766.T | ¥22,515.00 | +9.72% | 3.1T | 40.60 | ¥556.09 | +0.73% |
| 3659.T | ¥2,811.50 | +1.35% | 2.3T | 18.76 | ¥150.63 | +1.06% |
| 9697.T | ¥3,956.00 | +2.06% | 1.7T | 34.27 | ¥115.89 | +1.01% |
| 9684.T | ¥10,670.00 | +3.89% | 1.3T | 51.76 | ¥203.35 | +0.67% |
| 3635.T | ¥2,020.50 | +1.66% | 641.9B | 17.87 | ¥113.69 | +2.36% |
| 6460.T | ¥3,085.00 | -0.64% | 608.4B | 15.03 | ¥208.89 | +1.59% |
| 2432.T | ¥2,396.50 | +0.40% | 266.8B | 11.04 | ¥216.98 | +1.38% |
| 2121.T | ¥3,160.00 | -8.80% | 215.6B | 12.65 | ¥252.60 | +3.76% |
Stock Comparison
3667.T vs 7974.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 7974.T has a market cap of 14.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 7974.T trades at ¥13,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 7974.T's P/E ratio is 52.51. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 7974.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 7974.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 7974.T's competition here
3667.T vs 9766.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 9766.T has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 9766.T trades at ¥22,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 9766.T's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 9766.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 9766.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 9766.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3659.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3659.T has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3659.T trades at ¥2,811.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3659.T's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3659.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3659.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3659.T's competition here
3667.T vs 9697.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 9697.T has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 9697.T trades at ¥3,956.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 9697.T's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 9697.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 9697.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 9697.T's competition here
3667.T vs 9684.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 9684.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 9684.T trades at ¥10,670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 9684.T's P/E ratio is 51.76. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 9684.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 9684.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 9684.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3635.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3635.T has a market cap of 641.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3635.T trades at ¥2,020.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3635.T's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3635.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3635.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3635.T's competition here
3667.T vs 6460.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6460.T has a market cap of 608.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 6460.T trades at ¥3,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 6460.T's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 6460.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 6460.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 6460.T's competition here
3667.T vs 2432.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2432.T has a market cap of 266.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 2432.T trades at ¥2,396.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 2432.T's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 2432.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 2432.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 2432.T's competition here
3667.T vs 2121.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 2121.T has a market cap of 215.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 2121.T trades at ¥3,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 2121.T's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 2121.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 2121.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 2121.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3765.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3765.T has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3765.T trades at ¥2,954.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3765.T's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3765.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3765.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3765.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3632.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3632.T has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3632.T trades at ¥508.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3632.T's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3632.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3632.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3632.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3668.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3668.T has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3668.T trades at ¥526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3668.T's P/E ratio is -36.11. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3668.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3668.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3668.T's competition here
3667.T vs 4393.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 4393.T has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 4393.T trades at ¥12,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 4393.T's P/E ratio is -141.95. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 4393.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 4393.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 4393.T's competition here
3667.T vs 7803.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 7803.T has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 7803.T trades at ¥677.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 7803.T's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 7803.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 7803.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 7803.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3932.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3932.T has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3932.T trades at ¥3,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3932.T's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3932.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3932.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3932.T's competition here
3667.T vs 7844.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 7844.T has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 7844.T trades at ¥518.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 7844.T's P/E ratio is 37.87. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 7844.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 7844.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 7844.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3903.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3903.T has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3903.T trades at ¥612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3903.T's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3903.T's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3903.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3903.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3793.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3793.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3793.T trades at ¥484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3793.T's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3793.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3793.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3793.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3911.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3911.T has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3911.T trades at ¥286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3911.T's P/E ratio is -38.24. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3911.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3911.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3911.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3723.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3723.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3723.T trades at ¥1,186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3723.T's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3723.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3723.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3723.T's competition here
3667.T vs 4175.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 4175.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 4175.T trades at ¥1,914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 4175.T's P/E ratio is -18.65. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 4175.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 4175.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 4175.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3698.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3698.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3698.T trades at ¥1,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3698.T's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3698.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3698.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3698.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3656.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3656.T has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3656.T trades at ¥127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3656.T's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3656.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3656.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3656.T's competition here
3667.T vs 6428.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6428.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 6428.T trades at ¥320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 6428.T's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 6428.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 6428.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 6428.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3904.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3904.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3904.T trades at ¥438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3904.T's P/E ratio is 47.84. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3904.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3904.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3904.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3912.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3912.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3912.T trades at ¥964.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3912.T's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3912.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3912.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3912.T's competition here
3667.T vs 6033.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6033.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 6033.T trades at ¥1,290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 6033.T's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 6033.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 6033.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 6033.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3758.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3758.T has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3758.T trades at ¥325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3758.T's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3758.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3758.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3758.T's competition here
3667.T vs 4777.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 4777.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 4777.T trades at ¥239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 4777.T's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 4777.T's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 4777.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 4777.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3810.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3810.T has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3810.T trades at ¥352.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3810.T's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3810.T's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3810.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3810.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3760.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3760.T has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3760.T trades at ¥952.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3760.T's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3760.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3760.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3760.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3935.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3935.T has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3935.T trades at ¥920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3935.T's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3935.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3935.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3935.T's competition here
3667.T vs 4728.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 4728.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 4728.T trades at ¥682.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 4728.T's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 4728.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 4728.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 4728.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3851.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3851.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3851.T trades at ¥863.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3851.T's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3851.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3851.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3851.T's competition here
3667.T vs 5240.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 5240.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 5240.T trades at ¥332.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 5240.T's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 5240.T's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 5240.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 5240.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3664.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3664.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3664.T trades at ¥64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3664.T's P/E ratio is -17.16. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3664.T's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3664.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3664.T's competition here
3667.T vs 6552.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 6552.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 6552.T trades at ¥211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 6552.T's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 6552.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 6552.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 6552.T's competition here
3667.T vs 4334.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 4334.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 4334.T trades at ¥416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 4334.T's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 4334.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 4334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 4334.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3672.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3672.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3672.T trades at ¥77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3672.T's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3672.T's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is less volatile compared to 3672.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3672.T's competition here
3667.T vs 9565.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 9565.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 9565.T trades at ¥953.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 9565.T's P/E ratio is -30.49. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 9565.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 9565.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 9565.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3907.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3907.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3907.T trades at ¥921.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3907.T's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3907.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3907.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3907.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3928.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3928.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3928.T trades at ¥255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3928.T's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3928.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3928.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3928.T's competition here
3667.T vs 3639.T Comparison August 2025
3667.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3667.T stands at 3.9B. In comparison, 3639.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3667.T is priced at ¥114.00, while 3639.T trades at ¥281.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3667.T currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas 3639.T's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, 3667.T's ROE is -0.87%, compared to 3639.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3667.T is more volatile compared to 3639.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3667.T.Check 3639.T's competition here