NEXON Co., Ltd.
NEXON Co., Ltd. (3659.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3659.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3659.T | ¥2,667.50 | +0.60% | 2.1T | 23.40 | ¥114.01 | +1.46% |
| 7974.T | ¥8,736.00 | -0.30% | 10.2T | 27.56 | ¥316.98 | +2.06% |
| 9766.T | ¥19,100.00 | -1.50% | 2.6T | 30.18 | ¥632.96 | +0.88% |
| 9697.T | ¥3,371.00 | -0.65% | 1.4T | 23.25 | ¥144.99 | +1.07% |
| 9684.T | ¥2,595.50 | +2.14% | 935.8B | 41.19 | ¥63.02 | +1.46% |
| 3635.T | ¥1,603.50 | +0.22% | 535.7B | 14.69 | ¥109.12 | +2.68% |
| 6460.T | ¥2,454.00 | -1.11% | 516B | 30.02 | ¥81.75 | +2.01% |
| 2432.T | ¥2,560.00 | +3.04% | 285.4B | 6.46 | ¥396.18 | +2.05% |
| 2121.T | ¥2,540.00 | +0.28% | 165.4B | 10.14 | ¥250.46 | +4.24% |
| 3765.T | ¥2,541.00 | -0.20% | 138.1B | 99.65 | ¥25.50 | +2.82% |
Stock Comparison
3659.T vs 7974.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 7974.T has a market cap of 10.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 7974.T trades at ¥8,736.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 7974.T's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7974.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 7974.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 7974.T's competition here
3659.T vs 9766.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 9766.T has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 9766.T trades at ¥19,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 9766.T's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9766.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 9766.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 9766.T's competition here
3659.T vs 9697.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 9697.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 9697.T trades at ¥3,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 9697.T's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9697.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 9697.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 9697.T's competition here
3659.T vs 9684.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 9684.T has a market cap of 935.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 9684.T trades at ¥2,595.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 9684.T's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9684.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 9684.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 9684.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3635.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3635.T has a market cap of 535.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3635.T trades at ¥1,603.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3635.T's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3635.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3635.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3635.T's competition here
3659.T vs 6460.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 6460.T has a market cap of 516B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 6460.T trades at ¥2,454.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 6460.T's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6460.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 6460.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 6460.T's competition here
3659.T vs 2432.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 2432.T has a market cap of 285.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 2432.T trades at ¥2,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 2432.T's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2432.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is less volatile compared to 2432.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 2432.T's competition here
3659.T vs 2121.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 2121.T has a market cap of 165.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 2121.T trades at ¥2,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 2121.T's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2121.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 2121.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 2121.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3765.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3765.T has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3765.T trades at ¥2,541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3765.T's P/E ratio is 99.65. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3765.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3765.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3765.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3632.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3632.T has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3632.T trades at ¥382.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3632.T's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3632.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3632.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3632.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3668.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3668.T has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3668.T trades at ¥437.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3668.T's P/E ratio is -183.61. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3668.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3668.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3668.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3932.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3932.T has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3932.T trades at ¥2,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3932.T's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3932.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3932.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3932.T's competition here
3659.T vs 7803.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 7803.T has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 7803.T trades at ¥260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 7803.T's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7803.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 7803.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 7803.T's competition here
3659.T vs 7844.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 7844.T has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 7844.T trades at ¥459.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 7844.T's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7844.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 7844.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 7844.T's competition here
3659.T vs 4393.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 4393.T has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 4393.T trades at ¥5,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 4393.T's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4393.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 4393.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 4393.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3723.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3723.T has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3723.T trades at ¥1,971.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3723.T's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3723.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3723.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3723.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3656.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3656.T has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3656.T trades at ¥340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3656.T's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3656.T's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is less volatile compared to 3656.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3656.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3903.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3903.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3903.T trades at ¥327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3903.T's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3903.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3903.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3903.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3793.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3793.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3793.T trades at ¥401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3793.T's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3793.T's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3793.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3793.T's competition here
3659.T vs 4175.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 4175.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 4175.T trades at ¥2,008.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 4175.T's P/E ratio is 73.34. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4175.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 4175.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 4175.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3911.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3911.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3911.T trades at ¥195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3911.T's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3911.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3911.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3911.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3912.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3912.T has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3912.T trades at ¥1,177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3912.T's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3912.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3912.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3912.T's competition here
3659.T vs 6033.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 6033.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 6033.T trades at ¥1,484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 6033.T's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6033.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 6033.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 6033.T's competition here
3659.T vs 6428.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 6428.T has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 6428.T trades at ¥327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 6428.T's P/E ratio is 286.84. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6428.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 6428.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 6428.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3904.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3904.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3904.T trades at ¥431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3904.T's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3904.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3904.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3904.T's competition here
3659.T vs 4777.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 4777.T has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 4777.T trades at ¥207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 4777.T's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4777.T's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 4777.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 4777.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3758.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3758.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3758.T trades at ¥249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3758.T's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3758.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3758.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3758.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3698.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3698.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3698.T trades at ¥948.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3698.T's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3698.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3698.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3698.T's competition here
3659.T vs 4728.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 4728.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 4728.T trades at ¥645.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 4728.T's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4728.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 4728.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 4728.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3851.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3851.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3851.T trades at ¥843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3851.T's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3851.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3851.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3851.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3810.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3810.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3810.T trades at ¥240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3810.T's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3810.T's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3810.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3810.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3760.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3760.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3760.T trades at ¥656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3760.T's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3760.T's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3760.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3760.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3935.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3935.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3935.T trades at ¥668.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3935.T's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3935.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3935.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3935.T's competition here
3659.T vs 4334.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 4334.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 4334.T trades at ¥388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 4334.T's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4334.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 4334.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 4334.T's competition here
3659.T vs 6552.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 6552.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 6552.T trades at ¥171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 6552.T's P/E ratio is -178.12. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6552.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 6552.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 6552.T's competition here
3659.T vs 5240.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 5240.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 5240.T trades at ¥218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 5240.T's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 5240.T's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 5240.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 5240.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3928.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3928.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3928.T trades at ¥277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3928.T's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3928.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3928.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3928.T's competition here
3659.T vs 9565.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 9565.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 9565.T trades at ¥722.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 9565.T's P/E ratio is 519.42. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9565.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 9565.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 9565.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3907.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3907.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3907.T trades at ¥688.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3907.T's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3907.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3907.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3907.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3664.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3664.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3664.T trades at ¥31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3664.T's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3664.T's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3664.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3664.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3667.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3667.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3667.T trades at ¥55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3667.T's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3667.T's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is less volatile compared to 3667.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3667.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3672.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3672.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3672.T trades at ¥40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3672.T's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3672.T's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is less volatile compared to 3672.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3672.T's competition here
3659.T vs 3639.T Comparison April 2026
3659.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3659.T stands at 2.1T. In comparison, 3639.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3659.T is priced at ¥2,667.50, while 3639.T trades at ¥238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.40, whereas 3639.T's P/E ratio is -117.82. In terms of profitability, 3659.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3639.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3659.T is more volatile compared to 3639.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3659.T.Check 3639.T's competition here