Asahi Co., Ltd.
Asahi Co., Ltd. 3333.T Peers
See (3333.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3333.T | ¥1,320.00 | -0.53% | 34.4B | 9.67 | ¥136.55 | +3.79% |
| 4755.T | ¥804.90 | +0.50% | 1.7T | -8.95 | -¥89.90 | N/A |
| 9843.T | ¥14,335.00 | -1.71% | 1.6T | 21.07 | ¥680.43 | +1.06% |
| 8136.T | ¥6,467.00 | -2.03% | 1.5T | 38.36 | ¥168.60 | +0.80% |
| 3064.T | ¥2,818.50 | -0.76% | 1.4T | 50.70 | ¥55.59 | +0.67% |
| 3092.T | ¥1,548.00 | +0.26% | 1.4T | 30.43 | ¥50.87 | +2.30% |
| 4385.T | ¥2,600.00 | +4.38% | 427.4B | 26.76 | ¥97.15 | N/A |
| 9831.T | ¥435.10 | +0.02% | 301.3B | 11.27 | ¥38.59 | +2.99% |
| 7419.T | ¥2,879.00 | +0.91% | 275.8B | 9.01 | ¥319.58 | +0.76% |
| 3048.T | ¥1,514.00 | -1.05% | 259.2B | 14.95 | ¥101.29 | +2.77% |
Stock Comparison
3333.T vs 4755.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 4755.T has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 4755.T trades at ¥804.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 4755.T's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4755.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 4755.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9843.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9843.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9843.T trades at ¥14,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9843.T's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9843.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9843.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8136.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8136.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8136.T trades at ¥6,467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8136.T's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8136.T's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 8136.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3064.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3064.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3064.T trades at ¥2,818.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3064.T's P/E ratio is 50.70. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3064.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3064.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3092.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3092.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3092.T trades at ¥1,548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3092.T's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3092.T's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3092.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 4385.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 4385.T has a market cap of 427.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 4385.T trades at ¥2,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 4385.T's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4385.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 4385.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9831.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9831.T has a market cap of 301.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9831.T trades at ¥435.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9831.T's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9831.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9831.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7419.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7419.T has a market cap of 275.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7419.T trades at ¥2,879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7419.T's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7419.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7419.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3048.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3048.T has a market cap of 259.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3048.T trades at ¥1,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3048.T's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3048.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3048.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8282.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8282.T has a market cap of 229.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8282.T trades at ¥1,421.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8282.T's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8282.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 8282.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8022.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8022.T has a market cap of 207B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8022.T trades at ¥2,629.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8022.T's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8022.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 8022.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2730.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2730.T has a market cap of 204.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2730.T trades at ¥1,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2730.T's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2730.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 2730.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2678.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2678.T has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2678.T trades at ¥1,558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2678.T's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2678.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 2678.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7545.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7545.T has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7545.T trades at ¥2,101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7545.T's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7545.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 7545.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7552.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7552.T has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7552.T trades at ¥5,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7552.T's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7552.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7552.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9832.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9832.T has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9832.T trades at ¥1,449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9832.T's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9832.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9832.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9842.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9842.T has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9842.T trades at ¥1,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9842.T's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9842.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9842.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3028.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3028.T has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3028.T trades at ¥2,373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3028.T's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3028.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3028.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9997.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9997.T has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9997.T trades at ¥904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9997.T's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9997.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9997.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9422.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9422.T has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9422.T trades at ¥1,912.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9422.T's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9422.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9422.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7685.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7685.T has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7685.T trades at ¥2,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7685.T's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7685.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7685.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3964.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3964.T has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3964.T trades at ¥1,534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3964.T's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3964.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3964.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2681.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2681.T has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2681.T trades at ¥1,576.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2681.T's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2681.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 2681.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 4449.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 4449.T has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 4449.T trades at ¥1,808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 4449.T's P/E ratio is -297.37. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4449.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 4449.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3328.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3328.T has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3328.T trades at ¥3,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3328.T's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3328.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3328.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8281.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8281.T has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8281.T trades at ¥1,142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8281.T's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8281.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 8281.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3093.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3093.T has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3093.T trades at ¥1,806.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3093.T's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3093.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3093.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 6058.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 6058.T has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 6058.T trades at ¥900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 6058.T's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6058.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 6058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2751.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2751.T has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2751.T trades at ¥3,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2751.T's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2751.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 2751.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3660.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3660.T has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3660.T trades at ¥526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3660.T's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3660.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3660.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9441.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9441.T has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9441.T trades at ¥1,898.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9441.T's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9441.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9441.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8005.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8005.T has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8005.T trades at ¥1,054.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8005.T's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8005.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 8005.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3159.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3159.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3159.T trades at ¥332.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3159.T's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3159.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3159.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2484.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2484.T has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2484.T trades at ¥231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2484.T's P/E ratio is -30.16. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2484.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 2484.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2674.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2674.T has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2674.T trades at ¥1,747.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2674.T's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2674.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 2674.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9278.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9278.T has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9278.T trades at ¥1,387.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9278.T's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9278.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9278.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3179.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3179.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3179.T trades at ¥1,128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3179.T's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3179.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3179.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3134.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3134.T has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3134.T trades at ¥1,442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3134.T's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3134.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3134.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 6061.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 6061.T has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 6061.T trades at ¥4,665.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 6061.T's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6061.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 6061.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3031.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3031.T has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3031.T trades at ¥812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3031.T's P/E ratio is 53.88. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3031.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3031.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7455.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7455.T has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7455.T trades at ¥290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7455.T's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7455.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7455.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8202.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8202.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8202.T trades at ¥163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8202.T's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8202.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 8202.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3542.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3542.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3542.T trades at ¥1,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3542.T's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3542.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3542.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3558.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3558.T has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3558.T trades at ¥1,305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3558.T's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3558.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3558.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8165.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8165.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8165.T trades at ¥263.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8165.T's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8165.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 8165.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9272.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9272.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9272.T trades at ¥1,256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9272.T's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9272.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9272.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9270.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9270.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9270.T trades at ¥910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9270.T's P/E ratio is -22.35. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9270.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9270.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7636.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7636.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7636.T trades at ¥833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7636.T's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7636.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 7636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7110.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7110.T has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7110.T trades at ¥1,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7110.T's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7110.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7110.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7514.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7514.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7514.T trades at ¥840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7514.T's P/E ratio is 67.96. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7514.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 7514.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7610.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7610.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7610.T trades at ¥156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7610.T's P/E ratio is 72.56. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7610.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7610.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8289.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8289.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8289.T trades at ¥423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8289.T's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8289.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 8289.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2652.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2652.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2652.T trades at ¥287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2652.T's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2652.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 2652.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3135.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3135.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3135.T trades at ¥1,624.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3135.T's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3135.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3135.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2769.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2769.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2769.T trades at ¥1,043.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2769.T's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2769.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 2769.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3319.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3319.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3319.T trades at ¥428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3319.T's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3319.T's ROE of +10.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3319.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3556.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3556.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3556.T trades at ¥529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3556.T's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3556.T's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3556.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7442.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7442.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7442.T trades at ¥395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7442.T's P/E ratio is 362.39. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7442.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 7442.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3560.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3560.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3560.T trades at ¥3,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3560.T's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3560.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3560.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3726.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3726.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3726.T trades at ¥697.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3726.T's P/E ratio is -25.03. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3726.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3726.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3187.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3187.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3187.T trades at ¥377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3187.T's P/E ratio is 95.69. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3187.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3187.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9927.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9927.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9927.T trades at ¥768.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9927.T's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9927.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9927.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3396.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3396.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3396.T trades at ¥840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3396.T's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3396.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3396.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8230.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8230.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8230.T trades at ¥304.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8230.T's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8230.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 8230.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7695.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7695.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7695.T trades at ¥2,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7695.T's P/E ratio is 34.98. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7695.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 7695.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3172.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3172.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3172.T trades at ¥1,157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3172.T's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3172.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3172.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3058.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3058.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3058.T trades at ¥675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3058.T's P/E ratio is 140.92. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3058.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3059.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3059.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3059.T trades at ¥858.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3059.T's P/E ratio is 553.55. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3059.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3059.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3190.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3190.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3190.T trades at ¥590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3190.T's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3190.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3190.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9444.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9444.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9444.T trades at ¥627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9444.T's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9444.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9444.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 4937.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 4937.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 4937.T trades at ¥1,096.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 4937.T's P/E ratio is 90.58. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4937.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 4937.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9557.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9557.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9557.T trades at ¥470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9557.T's P/E ratio is 99.16. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9557.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9557.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3195.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3195.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3195.T trades at ¥410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3195.T's P/E ratio is -23.99. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3195.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3195.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3181.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3181.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3181.T trades at ¥862.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3181.T's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3181.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3181.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3138.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3138.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3138.T trades at ¥937.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3138.T's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3138.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3138.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3177.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3177.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3177.T trades at ¥3,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3177.T's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3177.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3177.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3071.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3071.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3071.T trades at ¥111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3071.T's P/E ratio is 740.00. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3071.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3071.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9425.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9425.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9425.T trades at ¥556.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9425.T's P/E ratio is -36.97. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9425.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9854.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9854.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9854.T trades at ¥151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9854.T's P/E ratio is -12.91. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9854.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 9854.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 8225.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 8225.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 8225.T trades at ¥4,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 8225.T's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8225.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 8225.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3185.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3185.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3185.T trades at ¥133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3185.T's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3185.T's ROE of -7.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3185.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7640.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7640.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7640.T trades at ¥150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7640.T's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7640.T's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 7640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 9978.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 9978.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 9978.T trades at ¥52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 9978.T's P/E ratio is 92.86. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9978.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 9978.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7501.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7501.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7501.T trades at ¥872.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7501.T's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7501.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7501.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2666.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2666.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2666.T trades at ¥145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2666.T's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2666.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 2666.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7477.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7477.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7477.T trades at ¥1,338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7477.T's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7477.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 7477.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3779.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3779.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3779.T trades at ¥160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3779.T's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3779.T's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 3779.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3192.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3192.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3192.T trades at ¥273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3192.T's P/E ratio is -23.66. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3192.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3192.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3174.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3174.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3174.T trades at ¥701.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3174.T's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3174.T's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3174.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 4017.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 4017.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 4017.T trades at ¥257.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 4017.T's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4017.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 4017.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3416.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3416.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3416.T trades at ¥950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3416.T's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3416.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3416.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2673.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2673.T has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2673.T trades at ¥122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2673.T's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2673.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is less volatile compared to 2673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 7618.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 7618.T has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 7618.T trades at ¥479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 7618.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7618.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 7618.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 2729.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 2729.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 2729.T trades at ¥2,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 2729.T's P/E ratio is -87.28. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2729.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 2729.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.
3333.T vs 3658.T Comparison
3333.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3333.T stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3658.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3333.T is priced at ¥1,320.00, while 3658.T trades at ¥4,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3333.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas 3658.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3333.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3658.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3333.T is more volatile compared to 3658.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3333.T.