Tea Life Co., Ltd.
Tea Life Co., Ltd. (3172.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3172.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3172.T | ¥1,131.00 | +0.53% | 4.8B | 13.66 | ¥82.58 | +3.55% |
| 4755.T | ¥755.10 | -4.07% | 1.6T | -8.45 | -¥89.97 | N/A |
| 8136.T | ¥6,045.00 | -3.86% | 1.5T | 36.73 | ¥168.52 | +0.83% |
| 9843.T | ¥12,100.00 | -5.87% | 1.4T | -74.73 | -¥168.40 | +1.21% |
| 3092.T | ¥1,491.00 | -0.10% | 1.3T | 29.43 | ¥50.89 | +2.38% |
| 3064.T | ¥2,568.00 | -4.27% | 1.3T | 44.00 | ¥58.75 | +0.97% |
| 4385.T | ¥2,315.00 | -1.59% | 384.4B | 24.04 | ¥97.16 | N/A |
| 9831.T | ¥465.50 | -1.08% | 324.8B | 12.15 | ¥38.59 | +2.77% |
| 7419.T | ¥3,355.00 | -6.55% | 323.4B | 10.55 | ¥319.51 | +0.65% |
| 3048.T | ¥1,620.50 | +1.19% | 275.7B | 14.92 | ¥107.94 | +2.61% |
Stock Comparison
3172.T vs 4755.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 4755.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 4755.T trades at ¥755.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 4755.T's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4755.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 4755.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 4755.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8136.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8136.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8136.T trades at ¥6,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8136.T's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8136.T's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 8136.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8136.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9843.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9843.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9843.T trades at ¥12,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9843.T's P/E ratio is -74.73. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9843.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9843.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9843.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3092.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3092.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3092.T trades at ¥1,491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3092.T's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3092.T's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3092.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3092.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3064.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3064.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3064.T trades at ¥2,568.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3064.T's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3064.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3064.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3064.T's competition here
3172.T vs 4385.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 4385.T has a market cap of 384.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 4385.T trades at ¥2,315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 4385.T's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4385.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 4385.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 4385.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9831.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9831.T has a market cap of 324.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9831.T trades at ¥465.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9831.T's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9831.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9831.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9831.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7419.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7419.T has a market cap of 323.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7419.T trades at ¥3,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7419.T's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7419.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7419.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7419.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3048.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3048.T has a market cap of 275.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3048.T trades at ¥1,620.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3048.T's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3048.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3048.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3048.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8282.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8282.T has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8282.T trades at ¥1,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8282.T's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8282.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 8282.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8282.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2730.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2730.T has a market cap of 213.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2730.T trades at ¥1,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2730.T's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2730.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 2730.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2730.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8022.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8022.T has a market cap of 212.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8022.T trades at ¥2,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8022.T's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8022.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 8022.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8022.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2678.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2678.T has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2678.T trades at ¥1,545.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2678.T's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2678.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 2678.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2678.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7545.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7545.T has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7545.T trades at ¥2,253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7545.T's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7545.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7545.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7545.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7552.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7552.T has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7552.T trades at ¥5,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7552.T's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7552.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7552.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7552.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9832.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9832.T has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9832.T trades at ¥1,504.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9832.T's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9832.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9832.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9832.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9842.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9842.T has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9842.T trades at ¥1,783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9842.T's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9842.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9842.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9842.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3028.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3028.T has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3028.T trades at ¥2,475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3028.T's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3028.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3028.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3028.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9997.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9997.T has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9997.T trades at ¥958.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9997.T's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9997.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9997.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9997.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7685.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7685.T has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7685.T trades at ¥2,854.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7685.T's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7685.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7685.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7685.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9422.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9422.T has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9422.T trades at ¥1,912.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9422.T's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9422.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 9422.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9422.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3964.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3964.T has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3964.T trades at ¥1,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3964.T's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3964.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3964.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3964.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2681.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2681.T has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2681.T trades at ¥1,689.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2681.T's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2681.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 2681.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2681.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3660.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3660.T has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3660.T trades at ¥623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3660.T's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3660.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3660.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3660.T's competition here
3172.T vs 6058.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 6058.T has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 6058.T trades at ¥1,118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 6058.T's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6058.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T and 6058.T have similar daily volatility (0.80).Check 6058.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3328.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3328.T has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3328.T trades at ¥3,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3328.T's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3328.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 3328.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3328.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8281.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8281.T has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8281.T trades at ¥1,133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8281.T's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8281.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 8281.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8281.T's competition here
3172.T vs 4449.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 4449.T has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 4449.T trades at ¥1,403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 4449.T's P/E ratio is -232.84. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4449.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 4449.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 4449.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2751.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2751.T has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2751.T trades at ¥3,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2751.T's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2751.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 2751.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2751.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3093.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3093.T has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3093.T trades at ¥1,705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3093.T's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3093.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3093.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3093.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8005.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8005.T has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8005.T trades at ¥1,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8005.T's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8005.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 8005.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8005.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3333.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3333.T has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3333.T trades at ¥1,396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3333.T's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3333.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3333.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3333.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3159.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3159.T has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3159.T trades at ¥325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3159.T's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3159.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3159.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3159.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9441.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9441.T has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9441.T trades at ¥2,436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9441.T's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9441.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9441.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9441.T's competition here
3172.T vs 6061.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 6061.T has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 6061.T trades at ¥6,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 6061.T's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6061.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 6061.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 6061.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3179.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3179.T has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3179.T trades at ¥1,294.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3179.T's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3179.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3179.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3179.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9278.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9278.T has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9278.T trades at ¥1,469.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9278.T's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9278.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9278.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9278.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2674.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2674.T has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2674.T trades at ¥1,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2674.T's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2674.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 2674.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2674.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3542.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3542.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3542.T trades at ¥2,072.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3542.T's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3542.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3542.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3542.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3134.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3134.T has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3134.T trades at ¥1,328.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3134.T's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3134.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3134.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3134.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2484.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2484.T has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2484.T trades at ¥198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2484.T's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2484.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 2484.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2484.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7455.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7455.T has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7455.T trades at ¥304.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7455.T's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7455.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7455.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7455.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8202.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8202.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8202.T trades at ¥162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8202.T's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8202.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 8202.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8202.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3558.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3558.T has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3558.T trades at ¥1,438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3558.T's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3558.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3558.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3558.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3031.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3031.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3031.T trades at ¥685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3031.T's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3031.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3031.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3031.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9272.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9272.T has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9272.T trades at ¥1,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9272.T's P/E ratio is 56.96. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9272.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9272.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9272.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7110.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7110.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7110.T trades at ¥1,637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7110.T's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7110.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7110.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7110.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8165.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8165.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8165.T trades at ¥244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8165.T's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8165.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 8165.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8165.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9270.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9270.T has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9270.T trades at ¥847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9270.T's P/E ratio is -20.94. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9270.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9270.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9270.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7636.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7636.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7636.T trades at ¥800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7636.T's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7636.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 7636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7636.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7514.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7514.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7514.T trades at ¥879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7514.T's P/E ratio is 71.49. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7514.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 7514.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7514.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2652.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2652.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2652.T trades at ¥326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2652.T's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2652.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 2652.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2652.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7610.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7610.T has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7610.T trades at ¥153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7610.T's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7610.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7610.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7610.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8289.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8289.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8289.T trades at ¥412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8289.T's P/E ratio is -140.27. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8289.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 8289.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8289.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3556.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3556.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3556.T trades at ¥641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3556.T's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3556.T's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3556.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3556.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3135.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3135.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3135.T trades at ¥1,615.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3135.T's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3135.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3135.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3135.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2769.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2769.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2769.T trades at ¥1,029.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2769.T's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2769.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 2769.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2769.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7442.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7442.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7442.T trades at ¥413.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7442.T's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7442.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 7442.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7442.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3319.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3319.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3319.T trades at ¥427.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3319.T's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3319.T's ROE of +10.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 3319.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3319.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3560.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3560.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3560.T trades at ¥3,385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3560.T's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3560.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3560.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3560.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3726.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3726.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3726.T trades at ¥628.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3726.T's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3726.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3726.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3726.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9927.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9927.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9927.T trades at ¥768.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9927.T's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9927.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 9927.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9927.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3187.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3187.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3187.T trades at ¥346.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3187.T's P/E ratio is 87.41. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3187.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3187.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3187.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3396.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3396.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3396.T trades at ¥835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3396.T's P/E ratio is 43.53. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3396.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 3396.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3396.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8230.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8230.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8230.T trades at ¥313.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8230.T's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8230.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 8230.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8230.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7695.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7695.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7695.T trades at ¥2,342.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7695.T's P/E ratio is 60.11. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7695.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7695.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7695.T's competition here
3172.T vs 4937.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 4937.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 4937.T trades at ¥1,243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 4937.T's P/E ratio is 114.88. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4937.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 4937.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 4937.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3058.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3058.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3058.T trades at ¥686.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3058.T's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3058.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 3058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3058.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3190.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3190.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3190.T trades at ¥589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3190.T's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3190.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3190.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3190.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3059.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3059.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3059.T trades at ¥840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3059.T's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3059.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3059.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3059.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9557.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9557.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9557.T trades at ¥488.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9557.T's P/E ratio is 105.59. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9557.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9557.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9557.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3195.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3195.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3195.T trades at ¥514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3195.T's P/E ratio is -170.07. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3195.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3195.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3195.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9444.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9444.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9444.T trades at ¥615.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9444.T's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9444.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9444.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9444.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9854.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9854.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9854.T trades at ¥198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9854.T's P/E ratio is 1094.44. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9854.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9854.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9854.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3181.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3181.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3181.T trades at ¥897.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3181.T's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3181.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3181.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3181.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9425.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9425.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9425.T trades at ¥597.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9425.T's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9425.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9425.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3071.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3071.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3071.T trades at ¥111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3071.T's P/E ratio is 740.00. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3071.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3071.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3071.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3177.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3177.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3177.T trades at ¥3,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3177.T's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3177.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3177.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3177.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3138.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3138.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3138.T trades at ¥916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3138.T's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3138.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3138.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3138.T's competition here
3172.T vs 8225.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 8225.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 8225.T trades at ¥3,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 8225.T's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8225.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 8225.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 8225.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3185.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3185.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3185.T trades at ¥140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3185.T's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3185.T's ROE of -7.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3185.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3185.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7640.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7640.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7640.T trades at ¥155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7640.T's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7640.T's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 7640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7640.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7501.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7501.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7501.T trades at ¥951.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7501.T's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7501.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7501.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7501.T's competition here
3172.T vs 9978.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 9978.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 9978.T trades at ¥54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 9978.T's P/E ratio is 94.64. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9978.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 9978.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 9978.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3779.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3779.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3779.T trades at ¥200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3779.T's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3779.T's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3779.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3779.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2666.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2666.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2666.T trades at ¥153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2666.T's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2666.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 2666.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2666.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7477.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7477.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7477.T trades at ¥1,287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7477.T's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7477.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 7477.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7477.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3174.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3174.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3174.T trades at ¥716.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3174.T's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3174.T's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3174.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3174.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3416.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3416.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3416.T trades at ¥1,016.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3416.T's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3416.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3416.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3416.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3192.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3192.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3192.T trades at ¥267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3192.T's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3192.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 3192.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3192.T's competition here
3172.T vs 4017.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 4017.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 4017.T trades at ¥255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 4017.T's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4017.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 4017.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 4017.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2673.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2673.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2673.T trades at ¥142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2673.T's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2673.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is less volatile compared to 2673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2673.T's competition here
3172.T vs 7618.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 7618.T has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 7618.T trades at ¥479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 7618.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7618.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 7618.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 7618.T's competition here
3172.T vs 2729.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 2729.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 2729.T trades at ¥2,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 2729.T's P/E ratio is -87.28. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2729.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 2729.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 2729.T's competition here
3172.T vs 3658.T Comparison August 2025
3172.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3172.T stands at 4.8B. In comparison, 3658.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3172.T is priced at ¥1,131.00, while 3658.T trades at ¥4,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3172.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas 3658.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3172.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3658.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3172.T is more volatile compared to 3658.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3172.T.Check 3658.T's competition here